Literature DB >> 29430836

Layered Manufacturing of Dental Ceramics: Fracture Mechanics, Microstructure, and Elemental Composition of Lithography-Sintered Ceramic.

Yurdanur Uçar1, İpek Aysan Meriç1, Orhun Ekren1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the fracture mechanics, microstructure, and elemental composition of lithography-based ceramic manufacturing with pressing and CAD/CAM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disc-shaped specimens (16 mm diameter, 1.2 mm thick) were used for mechanical testing (n = 10/group). Biaxial flexural strength of three groups (In-Ceram alumina [ICA], lithography-based alumina, ZirkonZahn) were determined using the "piston on 3-ball" technique as suggested in test Standard ISO-6872. Vickers hardness test was performed. Fracture toughness was calculated using fractography. Results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunnett T3 (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was conducted. Polished and fracture surface characterization was made using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used for elemental analysis.
RESULTS: Biaxial flexural strength of ICA, LCM alumina (LCMA), and ZirkonZahn were 147 ± 43 MPa, 490 ± 44 MPa, and 709 ± 94 MPa, respectively, and were statistically different (P ≤ 0.05). The Vickers hardness number of ICA was 850 ± 41, whereas hardness values for LCMA and ZirkonZahn were 1581 ± 144 and 1249 ± 57, respectively, and were statistically different (P ≤ 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between fracture toughness of ICA (2 ± 0.4 MPa⋅m1/2 ), LCMA (6.5 ± 1.5 MPa⋅m1/2 ), and ZirkonZahn (7.7 ± 1 MPa⋅m1/2 ) (P ≤ 0.05). Weibull modulus was highest for LCMA (m = 11.43) followed by ZirkonZahn (m = 8.16) and ICA (m = 5.21). Unlike LCMA and ZirkonZahn groups, a homogeneous microstructure was not observed for ICA. EDS results supported the SEM images.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that LCM seems to be a promising technique for final ceramic object manufacturing in dental applications. Both the manufacturing method and the material used should be improved.
© 2018 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; flexural strength; photosensitive resin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29430836     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  2 in total

Review 1.  3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alvaro Della Bona; Viviane Cantelli; Vitor T Britto; Kaue F Collares; Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 2.  3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Michael Edelmayer; Klara Janjić; Anna Sonja Müller; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.