Literature DB >> 29430574

How the personalities of medical students at the National University of Singapore differ from those of the local non-medical undergraduate population: a cross-sectional study.

Lyn Li Lean1, Ryan Yee Shiun Hong2, Lian Kah Ti1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Integrity and willingness to contribute to society are desired traits of medical students beyond academic excellence. We investigated the personality traits of medical students at the National University of Singapore (NUS), who were about to become doctors. Personality traits were compared with a peer population of local university students.
METHODS: This study was conducted between October 2013 and December 2014. Year 4 medical students were administered the Revised NEO (Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness) Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R), a 240-item Likert scale personality test. Test data was analysed by an institutional psychologist and compared to a separate sample of 377 non-medical students who were peers at the same university taking psychology as a module. Data was collated and analysed.
RESULTS: 65 Year 4 medical students completed the NEO PI-R personality test. The personalities of Year 4 medical students at NUS differed from their peers in all domains except for openness. NUS medical students generally had less neuroticism, and were more extroverted, agreeable and conscientious than their peers.
CONCLUSION: Personality testing of NUS Year 4 medical students showed many of the desired traits of a doctor when compared to their peers at the same university. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian; Big Five; college-aged; medical students; personality test

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29430574      PMCID: PMC6301879          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  17 in total

1.  Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; David James; Fiona O'Hehir; Andrea Sanders; I C McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

Review 2.  How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona Patterson; Alec Knight; Jon Dowell; Sandra Nicholson; Fran Cousans; Jennifer Cleland
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 16-22       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school.

Authors:  Filip Lievens; Deniz S Ones; Stephan Dilchert
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-11

5.  Predicting medical students' academic performances by their cognitive abilities and personality characteristics.

Authors:  H Shen; A L Comrey
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Trial use of the Personal Qualities Assessment (PQA) in the entrance examination of a Japanese medical university: similarities to the results in western countries.

Authors:  Yuriko Fukui; Saeko Noda; Midori Okada; Nakako Mihara; Yoriko Kawakami; Miles Bore; Don Munro; David Powis
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school.

Authors:  Mary Ann Lumsden; Miles Bore; Keith Millar; Rachael Jack; David Powis
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A longitudinal study of relationships between previous academic achievement, emotional intelligence and personality traits with psychological health of medical students during stressful periods.

Authors:  Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff; Ab Rahman Esa; Mohamad Najib Mat Pa; See Ching Mey; Rosniza Abdul Aziz; Ahmad Fuad Abdul Rahim
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2013 Jan-Apr

9.  Situational judgment test as an additional tool in a medical admission test: an observational investigation.

Authors:  Marion Luschin-Ebengreuth; Hans P Dimai; Daniel Ithaler; Heide M Neges; Gilbert Reibnegger
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-03-14

10.  Health-promoting factors in medical students and students of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: design and baseline results of a comparative longitudinal study.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Yannick Tautphäus; Martin Scherer; Edgar Voltmer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  1 in total

1.  Winds of change in medical education in Singapore: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Lionel Hon Wai Lum; Kian-Keong Poh; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.858

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.