Literature DB >> 29430521

A comparison of time-homogeneous Markov chain and Markov process multi-state models.

Lijie Wan1,2, Wenjie Lou1,2, Erin Abner2,3, Richard J Kryscio1,2,4.   

Abstract

Time-homogeneous Markov models are widely used tools for analyzing longitudinal data about the progression of a chronic disease over time. There are advantages to modeling the true disease progression as a discrete time stationary Markov chain. However, one limitation of this method is its inability to handle uneven follow-up assessments or skipped visits. A continuous time version of a homogeneous Markov process multi-state model could be an alternative approach. In this article, we conduct comparisons of these two methods for unevenly spaced observations. Simulations compare the performance of the two methods and two applications illustrate the results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chains; Markov processes; multi-state models; time homogeneous

Year:  2017        PMID: 29430521      PMCID: PMC5803756          DOI: 10.1080/23737484.2017.1361366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Case Stud Data Anal Appl        ISSN: 2373-7484


  12 in total

Review 1.  Multi-state models: a review.

Authors:  P Hougaard
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Multi-state models for bleeding episodes and mortality in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  P K Andersen; S Esbjerg; T I Sorensen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Multi-state models in epidemiology.

Authors:  D Commenges
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A penalized likelihood approach for a progressive three-state model with censored and truncated data: application to AIDS.

Authors:  P Joly; D Commenges
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A penalized likelihood approach for arbitrarily censored and truncated data: application to age-specific incidence of dementia.

Authors:  P Joly; D Commenges; L Letenneur
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors for transitions from normal to mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  R J Kryscio; F A Schmitt; J C Salazar; M S Mendiondo; W R Markesbery
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A comparison of non-homogeneous Markov regression models with application to Alzheimer's disease progression.

Authors:  R A Hubbard; X H Zhou
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.404

8.  Multi-state models for the analysis of time-to-event data.

Authors:  Luís Meira-Machado; Jacobo de Uña-Alvarez; Carmen Cadarso-Suárez; Per K Andersen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  A penalized likelihood approach for an illness-death model with interval-censored data: application to age-specific incidence of dementia.

Authors:  Pierre Joly; Daniel Commenges; Catherine Helmer; Luc Letenneur
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Mild cognitive impairment: statistical models of transition using longitudinal clinical data.

Authors:  Erin L Abner; Richard J Kryscio; Gregory E Cooper; David W Fardo; Gregory A Jicha; Marta S Mendiondo; Peter T Nelson; Charles D Smith; Linda J Van Eldik; Lijie Wan; Frederick A Schmitt
Journal:  Int J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012-03-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  Tobacco Smoking and Dementia in a Kentucky Cohort: A Competing Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Erin L Abner; Peter T Nelson; Gregory A Jicha; Gregory E Cooper; David W Fardo; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.