Literature DB >> 29430119

A Rare Case of Synchronous Papillary Microcarcinoma and Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of Unknown Primary.

Shambo Guha Roy1, Sarthak Tripathy1, Girish Kumar Parida1, Shipra Agarwal2, Chandrasekhar Bal1.   

Abstract

Thyroid papillary microcarcinomas (PMCs) usually follow a very benign clinical course and are rarely metastatic. Any case of PMC presenting with distant metastases without any rising thyroglobulin level should be suspected to have any other primary apart from the thyroid and a meticulous clinical and diagnostic approach should be considered to identify the second primary. We hereby present a case of 52-year-old female treated as PMC with metastatic liver lesion, which was initially thought to be of thyroidal origin. Later, it was diagnosed as a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuroendocrine tumor; papillary microcarcinoma; thyroglobulin

Year:  2018        PMID: 29430119      PMCID: PMC5798102          DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_58_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0974-0244


Case report

Here, we present a case of 52-year-old female who was referred to our thyroid clinic 1 year after she underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) for solitary thyroid nodule which was Bethesda category VI on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Later histopathology showed it to be papillary microcarcinoma of size 8 mm. Six months following her surgery, she started complaining of anorexia, fatigue, and right hypochondriac pain. An ultrasound abdomen revealed multiple hypoechoic liver lesions, which were suspicious for metastases. In the next 6 months, she also underwent a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) for the evaluation of the liver lesion. CECT revealed large hypodense enhancing lesion involving the right lobe of the liver and FDG-PET-CT showed them to be hypermetabolic, suggesting to be of a metastatic disease [Figure 1a–c]. She then underwent FNAC from the liver lesion which was reported as metastatic carcinoma. In view of a known thyroid malignancy, the primary clinician attributed the metastasis to be of thyroid origin and referred the patient to our center for radioiodine therapy. As per our institute protocol, 4 weeks off thyroxine, 100 mCi of empirical 131-I therapy was planned considering the possibility of non-thyroglobulin (Tg) secreting metastasis as serum Tg was <2 ng/ml. However, the posttherapy I-131 whole body scan did not show any abnormal concentration in the liver [Figure 2a and b; anterior and posterior images, respectively]. In view of normal Tg, nonradioiodine concentrating liver lesion and history of micropapillary carcinoma, which is rarely metastatic, possibility of second malignancy was considered. To confirm the diagnosis, a repeat liver biopsy was planned at our institute. The histopathology revealed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) cells [Figure 3a and b] which were immunopositive for chromogranin and synaptophysin [Figure 3c and d, respectively]. MIB-1 index could not be assessed due to tiny nature of the biopsy. Later, her serum chromogranin level was found to be >650 ng/l. Subsequently, a 68-Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT was planned which showed somatostatin receptor expressing tumor in both lobes of the liver with extensive skeletal metastasis [Figure 4a–c; transaxial CT, PET-CT, and maximum intensity projection images, respectively]. Here, DOTANOC PET-CT detected skeletal metastasis which was not detected previously. In spite of both FDG and DOTANOC PET-CT, primary tumor remained undetected. In view of extensive metastatic disease, she was put on long-acting octreotide and planned for 177-Lutetium DOTATATE therapy.
Figure 1

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography shows large hypodense, enhancing, hypermetabolic lesion involving the right lobe of liver, suggesting metastatic disease (a-c; transaxial computed, tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and maximum intensity projection images, respectively)

Figure 2

No abnormal rejection activity index accumulation noted in liver (a and b; anterior and posterior images, respectively)

Figure 3

The histopathology reveals neuroendocrine tumor cells (a and b), immunopositive for chromogranin and synaptophysin (c and d, respectively)

Figure 4

68-Ga-DOTANOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography shows somatostatin receptor expressing tumor in both lobes of liver with extensive skeletal metastasis (a-c; transaxial computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and maximum intensity projection images, respectively)

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography shows large hypodense, enhancing, hypermetabolic lesion involving the right lobe of liver, suggesting metastatic disease (a-c; transaxial computed, tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and maximum intensity projection images, respectively) No abnormal rejection activity index accumulation noted in liver (a and b; anterior and posterior images, respectively) The histopathology reveals neuroendocrine tumor cells (a and b), immunopositive for chromogranin and synaptophysin (c and d, respectively) 68-Ga-DOTANOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography shows somatostatin receptor expressing tumor in both lobes of liver with extensive skeletal metastasis (a-c; transaxial computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and maximum intensity projection images, respectively)

Discussion

Thyroid papillary microcarcinomas (PMCs) are defined as tumors <1 cm in greatest diameter. Papillary variety accounts for the majority of microcarcinomas followed by the follicular type. PMCs show a very benign natural history. Distant metastases are found in only 0.37% of cases as reported by Roti et al.[1] Metastases to cervical lymph nodes and other distant organs occur more often in nonincidental PMC than in incidental ones.[2] However, nonincidental PMC have a much more aggressive course as compared to the incidental ones, and TT with central lymph node dissection is recommended.[3] Cervical lymph nodes, lung, and bone are the most common sites of metastasis from differentiated carcinoma thyroid (DTC). Metastases to other organs are infrequent. Liver metastasis is rare in DTC. There are only few case reports and one case series published.[4567] In our patient, the liver lesion was attributed initially to metastasis from thyroid cancer. Due to the rarity of liver metastases in DTC, especially in a setting of microcarcinoma with normal Tg, a second malignancy was also kept as other differential diagnosis. As FDG-PET/CT could not locate any other primary, a core liver biopsy was planned, which showed it to be metastatic NET. This case presented is an example of synchronous double primary, i.e., the second malignancy occurred within 6 months of the primary malignancy.[8] Thyroid carcinoma is known to be associated to with second malignancies.[91011] The reported incidence of synchronous or metachronous nonthyroidal malignancies is 13.9%.[11] Leukemia, breast, and colon cancers have been reported to have higher incidence in thyroid cancer survivor.[910] We could find only one report of neuroendocrine tumor as synchronous second malignancy with DTC.[11] Based on the length of the time of tumor diagnoses, dual malignancies can be divided into two categories, i.e., synchronous and metachronous.[12] The cause of multiple primary cancers is still an enigma but much of the cause can be attributed to the family history, immunologic and genetic defects, prolonged exposure to carcinogens, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy to the primary cancer and field cancerization.[1314] In literature, Noh et al. have also reported a case of a quadruple cancer involving synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer that occurred after breast and rectal cancer.[13] The diagnostic criterion for multiple primary malignancies was laid down by Warren and Gates way back in 1932.[15] The salient features included that (a) each cancer must be definitively malignant by histopathology, (b) they must be histologically different, and (c) the possibility of metastasis among the cancers must be excluded. Since it was not very easy to differentiate between multiple primaries and multicentric cancers with this criterion, Moertel suggested another criterion which is widely used today.[8] According to this criterion, multiple malignancies are classified in three groups – (1) multiple primary malignant neoplasms of multicentric origin, (2) multiple primary malignant neoplasms of different tissues or organs, and (3) combination of the above two. This case presents a synchronous DTC with neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary. After extensive literature review, we could found only one reported such case.[11] It also highlights the importance of the meticulous unbiased clinical workup while dealing with a low-grade neoplasm with normal serum tumor markers, to name it as a metastatic disease. Our patient had papillary microcarcinoma which is rarely metastatic. Second, liver metastases are rare from DTC and her serum Tg levels were <2 ng/ml. All these points suggested the liver lesion unlikely to be of thyroidal origin. Hence, we suggest any suspicious liver lesion should be evaluated histopathologically in case DTC, unless it shows radioiodine concentration.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Rare metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: pictorial review.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Song; Yan-Li Xue; Yan-Hong Xu; Zhong-Ling Qiu; Quan-Yong Luo
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Differentiated thyroid cancer with liver metastases: lessons learned from managing a series of 14 patients.

Authors:  C Brient; S Mucci; D Taïeb; M Mathonnet; F Menegaux; E Mirallié; P Meyer; F Sebag; F Triponez; A Hamy
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-03

3.  Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: historical perspectives.

Authors:  C G Moertel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Risk factors contributing to the difference in prognosis for papillary versus micropapillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Theodore Karatzas; Ioannis Vasileiadis; Stylianos Kapetanakis; Efthimios Karakostas; George Chrousos; Gregory Kouraklis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A case report of quadruple cancer in a single patient including the breast, rectum, ovary, and endometrium.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Noh; Ji Yeong Yoon; Ui Nam Ryoo; Chel Hun Choi; Chang Ohk Sung; Tae Joong Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Clinical and histological characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: results of a retrospective study in 243 patients.

Authors:  Elio Roti; Roberta Rossi; Giorgio Trasforini; Fiorenza Bertelli; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Luciano Busutti; Elizabeth N Pearce; Lewis E Braverman; Ettore C Degli Uberti
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Elio Roti; Ettore C degli Uberti; Marta Bondanelli; Lewis E Braverman
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  Multiple primary malignancies in the head and neck: a clinical review of 121 patients.

Authors:  Tatsutoshi Suzuki; Hiroomi Takahashi; Kazuo Yao; Katsuhide Inagi; Meijin Nakayama; Tomohiro Makoshi; Hiromi Nagai; Makito Okamoto
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2002

9.  Solitary liver metastasis from follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Brano Djenic; Daniel Duick; James O Newell; Michael J Demeure
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-12

10.  Second primary malignancies in thyroid cancer patients.

Authors:  C Rubino; F de Vathaire; M E Dottorini; P Hall; C Schvartz; J E Couette; M G Dondon; M T Abbas; C Langlois; M Schlumberger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.