Literature DB >> 29429890

Response evaluation of giant-cell tumor of bone treated by denosumab: Histogram and texture analysis of CT images.

Jisook Yi1, Young Han Lee2, Sang Kyum Kim3, Seung Hyun Kim4, Ho-Taek Song5, Kyoo-Ho Shin4, Jin-Suck Suh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare computed tomography (CT) features, including tumor size and textural and histogram measurements, of giant-cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) before and after denosumab treatment and determine their applicability in monitoring GCTB response to denosumab treatment.
METHODS: This retrospective study included eight patients (male, 3; female, 5; mean age, 33.4 years) diagnosed with GCTB, who had received treatment by denosumab and had undergone pre- and post-treatment non-contrast CT between January 2010 and December 2016. This study was approved by the institutional review board. Pre- and post-treatment size, histogram, and textural parameters of GCTBs were compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Pathological findings of five patients who underwent surgery after denosumab treatment were evaluated for assessment of treatment response.
RESULTS: Relative to the baseline values, the tumor size had decreased, while the mean attenuation, standard deviation, entropy (all, P = 0.017), and skewness (P = 0.036) of the GCTBs had significantly increased post-treatment. Although the difference was statistically insignificant, the tumors also exhibited increased kurtosis, contrast, and inverse difference moment (P = 0.123, 0.327, and 0.575, respectively) post-treatment. Histologic findings revealed new bone formation and complete depletion or decrease in the number of osteoclast-like giant cells.
CONCLUSION: The histogram and textural parameters of GCTBs changed significantly after denosumab treatment. Knowledge of the tendency towards increased mean attenuation and heterogeneity but increased local homogeneity in post-treatment CT histogram and textural features of GCTBs might aid in treatment planning and tumor response evaluation during denosumab treatment.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29429890     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  7 in total

Review 1.  Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone.

Authors:  Daniel T Miles; Ryan T Voskuil; Wood Dale; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28

2.  Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Badaruddin Sahito; Sheikh Muhammad Ebad Ali; Dileep Kumar; Jagdesh Kumar; Nauman Hussain; Tahir Lakho
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-29

3.  Prediction of the early recurrence in spinal giant cell tumor of bone using radiomics of preoperative CT: Long-term outcome of 62 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Qizheng Wang; Yang Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Xiaoying Xing; Yongye Chen; Min-Ying Su; Ning Lang
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.072

4.  Rapid Recurrence of Giant Cell Tumour of C2 Vertebra After Long-Term Denosumab Following Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Kuldeep Bansal; Sumedha Singh; Abhinandan R Mallepally; Pratyush Shahi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 5.  Radiological findings of denosumab treatment for giant cell tumours of bone.

Authors:  Kirsten van Langevelde; Catherine L McCarthy
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Managements of giant cell tumor within the distal radius: A retrospective study of 58 cases from a single center.

Authors:  Changye Zou; Tiao Lin; Bo Wang; Zhiqiang Zhao; Bin Li; Xianbiao Xie; Gang Huang; Junqiang Yin; Jingnan Shen
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 7.  State of the Art and New Concepts in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Imaging Features and Tumor Characteristics.

Authors:  Anna Parmeggiani; Marco Miceli; Costantino Errani; Giancarlo Facchini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.