A R Díaz1, P Z Navas2. 1. Graduado en Medicina, Área de Traumatología, Facultad de Medicina, Málaga. 2. FEA COT, Unidad de Cadera, HCU Virgen de la Victoria, Facultad de Medicina, Málaga. Electronic address: pzn@uma.es.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The differences between the two main types of fracture of proximal end of the femur, trochanteric and cervical fractures, are still a subject of study, and could be the key to a better understanding of its pathophysiology and prevention. The aim of this study is to determine whether epidemiological differences in the distribution of risk factors associated with hip fracture exist between these two entities. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional study of 428 patients over the age of 65 admitted for trochanteric or cervical fractures in 2015, in which gender, age, previous diagnosis, external causes associated with fracture and place of the event were recorded. RESULTS: There were 220 patients with a cervical fracture (51.4%) and 208 patients with a trochanteric fracture (48.6%). The average age was higher in the trochanteric fracture, observing a constant increase with age only in women with trochanteric fractures. Cervical fracture showed a significant association with cerebrovascular disease (p=0.039) and trochanteric fracture with accidental falls (p=0.047) and presence of 5-9 previous diseases (p=0.014). A regression analysis maintained this association in the case of a cerebrovascular disease (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.1-6.4) and the presence of 5-9 diseases (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Trochanteric fractures are associated with women patients of more advanced ages, 5-9 previous diseases and accidental falls. Cerebrovascular disease shows a higher prevalence in cervical fractures.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The differences between the two main types of fracture of proximal end of the femur, trochanteric and cervical fractures, are still a subject of study, and could be the key to a better understanding of its pathophysiology and prevention. The aim of this study is to determine whether epidemiological differences in the distribution of risk factors associated with hip fracture exist between these two entities. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional study of 428 patients over the age of 65 admitted for trochanteric or cervical fractures in 2015, in which gender, age, previous diagnosis, external causes associated with fracture and place of the event were recorded. RESULTS: There were 220 patients with a cervical fracture (51.4%) and 208 patients with a trochanteric fracture (48.6%). The average age was higher in the trochanteric fracture, observing a constant increase with age only in women with trochanteric fractures. Cervical fracture showed a significant association with cerebrovascular disease (p=0.039) and trochanteric fracture with accidental falls (p=0.047) and presence of 5-9 previous diseases (p=0.014). A regression analysis maintained this association in the case of a cerebrovascular disease (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.1-6.4) and the presence of 5-9 diseases (OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Trochanteric fractures are associated with womenpatients of more advanced ages, 5-9 previous diseases and accidental falls. Cerebrovascular disease shows a higher prevalence in cervical fractures.
Keywords:
Cervical fracture; Comorbidities; Comorbilidades; Estilo de vida; Factores de riesgo; Fractura cervical; Fractura de cadera; Fractura trocantérica; Hip fracture; Lifestyle; Risk factors; Trochanteric fracture
Authors: Philipp Hemmann; Maximilian Friederich; Daniel Körner; Tim Klopfer; Christian Bahrs Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: P Hemmann; P Ziegler; C Konrads; A Ellmerer; T Klopfer; A J Schreiner; C Bahrs Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 2.359