Literature DB >> 29429597

Clinicopathologic features and prognoses of different histologic types of triple-negative breast cancer: A large population-based analysis.

Shen Zhao1, Ding Ma1, Yi Xiao1, Yi-Zhou Jiang2, Zhi-Ming Shao3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes of different histologic types of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
METHODS: We used the SEER database to identify patients with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Our analysis focused on the seven most prevalent histologic types. Differences were compared between invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) and the other six types.
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in age at diagnosis, tumor grade, size, nodal status and treatment. As tumor size increased, the number of positive lymph nodes increased markedly in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and mixed NST and lobular carcinoma (NST-ILC), while in metaplastic carcinoma the number only increased slightly. In multivariate survival analyses, compared with patients with invasive carcinoma NST, breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were worse for those with NST-ILC (BCSS: hazard ratio [HR] 1.81, P < .001; OS: HR 1.56, P = .005) or metaplastic carcinoma (BCSS: HR 1.95, P < .001; OS: HR 1.73, P < .001). By contrast, patients with medullary (HR 0.40, P = .010) or apocrine carcinoma (HR 0.27, P = .008) showed better BCSS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated that T category in ILC and N category in metaplastic carcinoma were of less prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the histologic classification of TNBC, this heterogeneous disease can be divided into several entities with different clinicopathologic features and prognoses. In the era of molecular subtyping of breast cancer, the histologic classification of TNBC is still of considerable clinical significance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinicopathologic characteristics; Histologic type; Prognosis; Triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29429597     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  14 in total

1.  Nomogram for predicting survival in triple-negative breast cancer patients with histology of infiltrating duct carcinoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Dongjun Dai; Hongchuan Jin; Xian Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Improving Invasive Breast Cancer Care Using Machine Learning Technology.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Solange S Tchounwou; Jameka Grigsby; Kearra Johnson; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  J Biomed Res Environ Sci       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 3.  Apocrine lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Cecily M Quinn; Clare D'Arcy; Clive Wells
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.535

4.  Clinical outcomes in patients with triple negative or HER2 positive lobular breast cancer: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Alicia Okines; Tazia Irfan; Bernice Asare; Kabir Mohammed; Peter Osin; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Ian E Smith; Marina Parton; Alistair Ring; Stephen Johnston; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Clinicopathological and genomic features of breast mucinous carcinoma.

Authors:  Kebin Lu; Xiao'e Wang; Wenyuan Zhang; Hui Ye; Lingling Lao; Xiaodong Zhou; Sijie Yao; Feng Lv
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Histologic subtyping affecting outcome of triple negative breast cancer: a large Sardinian population-based analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Sanges; Matteo Floris; Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Maria R Muroni; Giovanna Pira; Silvana Anna Maria Urru; Renata Barrocu; Silvano Gallus; Cristina Bosetti; Maurizio D'Incalci; Alessandra Manca; Maria Gabriela Uras; Ricardo Medda; Elisabetta Sollai; Alma Murgia; Dolores Palmas; Francesco Atzori; Angelo Zinellu; Francesca Cambosu; Tiziana Moi; Massimo Ghiani; Vincenzo Marras; Maria Cristina Santona; Luisa Canu; Enrichetta Valle; Maria Giuseppina Sarobba; Daniela Onnis; Anna Asunis; Sergio Cossu; Sandra Orrù; Maria Rosaria De Miglio
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic Value of Site-Specific Metastases and Surgery in De Novo Stage IV Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Yinfang Gu; Guowu Wu; Xiaofang Zou; Ping Huang; Lilan Yi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-02-11

8.  Chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival of small lesion node negative metaplastic breast carcinoma in T1c population rather than T1a and T1b.

Authors:  Qitong Chen; Qin Zhou; Hongye He; Yeqing He; Yunchang Yuan; Qiongyan Zou; Wenjun Yi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Clinical features and prognostic factors of male breast cancer vs. female breast cancer.

Authors:  Guo Sang; Hong Pan; Chen Lu; Rongneng Sun; Xiaoming Zha; Shui Wang; Dongya Zhu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 10.  Molecular subtypes and precision treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Shen Zhao; Wen-Jia Zuo; Zhi-Ming Shao; Yi-Zhou Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.