Literature DB >> 29428308

Differential rate in decline in ovarian reserve markers in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared with control subjects: results of a longitudinal study.

Asima K Ahmad1, Chia-Ning Kao2, Molly Quinn2, Nikolaus Lenhart2, Mitchell Rosen2, Marcelle I Cedars2, Heather Huddleston2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates of ovarian aging in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) subjects versus a community control population.
DESIGN: Longitudinal.
SETTING: Tertiary academic center. SUBJECT(S): PCOS subjects diagnosed according to the 2004 Rotterdam criteria were systematically enrolled in a PCOS cohort study. The comparison control subjects were from the Ovarian Aging study, a prospective longitudinal study of ovarian aging in healthy women with regular menstrual cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Clinical data collection over two study visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume (OV), and antimüllerian hormone level (AMH). RESULT(S): PCOS subjects were found to have higher baseline values for all ovarian reserve markers compared with control subjects. Univariate models indicated that, compared with control subjects, PCOS patients experienced significantly faster rates of decline for both AFC and AMH. Change in OV did not differ significantly. To account for potential confounder effects, multiple analysis of covariance models were evaluated for the best fit, considering age, body mass index, and baseline ovarian reserve markers. Adjusted models demonstrated that PCOS patients do not experience a significant difference in AFC decline compared with control subjects, but they do experience a faster rate of decline in AMH (P<.01) and slower rate of decline in OV (P<.01). CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian aging in PCOS is characterized by a more rapid decline in AMH and a slower decline in OV compared with control subjects.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Polycystic ovary syndrome; antimüllerian hormone; antral follicle count; longitudinal; ovarian aging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29428308     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hyperandrogenic origins of polycystic ovary syndrome - implications for pathophysiology and therapy.

Authors:  David H Abbott; Daniel A Dumesic; Jon E Levine
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-02-15

Review 2.  Mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel A Dumesic; Luis R Hoyos; Gregorio D Chazenbalk; Rajanigandha Naik; Vasantha Padmanabhan; David H Abbott
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  In utero Androgen Excess: A Developmental Commonality Preceding Polycystic Ovary Syndrome?

Authors:  David H Abbott; Marissa Kraynak; Daniel A Dumesic; Jon E Levine
Journal:  Front Horm Res       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.606

4.  Where are we in understanding the natural history of polycystic ovary syndrome? A systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies.

Authors:  Sylvia Kiconco; Chau Thien Tay; Kate Louise Rassie; Ricardo Azziz; Helena J Teede; Anju E Joham
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.353

5.  The Effect of Ageing on Clinical, Hormonal and Sonographic Features Associated with PCOS-A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Małgorzata Jacewicz-Święcka; Sławomir Wołczyński; Irina Kowalska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.