Literature DB >> 29428045

Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer: The Decision to Decline.

V Brook White, Kendall K Walsh, Kimberly Showers Foss, Lisa Amacker-North, Stacy Lenarcic, Lindsay McNeely, Richard L White.   

Abstract

Genetic testing is important for comprehensive cancer care. Commercial analysis of the BRCA1/2 genes has been available since 1996, and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is well established. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines identify individuals for whom BRCA1/2 analysis is appropriate and define management recommendations for mutation carriers. Despite recommendations, not all who meet NCCN criteria undergo genetic testing. We assess the frequency that individuals meeting NCCN criteria decline BRCA1/2 analysis, as well as factors that affect the decision-making process. A retrospective chart review was performed from September 2013 through August 2014 of individuals who received genetic counseling at the Levine Cancer Institute. A total of 1082 individuals identified through the retrospective chart review met NCCN criteria for BRCA1/2 analysis. Of these, 267 (24.7%) did not pursue genetic testing. Of the Nontested cohort, 59 (22.1%) were disinterested in testing and 108 (40.4%) were advised to gather additional genetic or medical information about their relatives before testing. The remaining 100 (37.5%) individuals were insured and desired to undergo genetic testing but were prohibited by the expense. Eighty five of these 100 patients were responsible for the total cost of the test, whereas the remaining 15 faced a prohibitive copay expense. Financial concerns are a major deterrent to the pursuit of BRCA1/2 analysis among those who meet NCNN criteria, especially in patients diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. These findings highlight the need to address financial concerns for genetic testing in this high-risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29428045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  How the "control-fate continuum" helps explain the genetic testing decision-making process: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; David Shaw; Karl Heinimann; Laura Knabben; Bernice Elger; Insa Koné
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Haimiao Yuan; Junlin Liao; Pamela Imperiale; Krysten Shipley; Lillian M Erdahl; Sonia L Sugg; Ronald J Weigel; Ingrid M Lizarraga
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Multi gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer - is it ready to be used?

Authors:  Andreea Catana; Adina Patricia Apostu; Razvan-Geo Antemie
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-07-31

4.  A novel MLH1 mutation in a Japanese family with Lynch syndrome associated with small bowel cancer.

Authors:  Yoshika Akizawa; Toshiyuki Yamamoto; Kazuo Tamura; Toshiyuki Kanno; Nobuko Takahashi; Takeshi Ohki; Teppei Omori; Katsutoshi Tokushige; Masakazu Yamamoto; Kayoko Saito
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2018-06-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.