Literature DB >> 29427584

Discordance between Ureteroscopic Biopsy and Final Pathology for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Ezra J Margolin1, Justin T Matulay1, Gen Li2, Xiaosong Meng3, Brian Chao3, Varun Vijay3, Hayley Silver3, Timothy N Clinton4, Laura-Maria Krabbe4, Solomon L Woldu4, Nirmish Singla4, Aditya Bagrodia4, Vitaly Margulis4, William C Huang3, Marc A Bjurlin3, Ojas Shah1, Christopher B Anderson5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the discordance between ureteroscopic biopsy and surgical pathology findings for grading and staging upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We also sought to establish preoperative predictors of aggressive tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 314 patients who underwent ureteroscopic biopsy followed by surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma from 2000 to 2016 at a total of 3 institutions. Our primary outcomes were muscle invasive (pT2 or greater) disease at surgical pathology and upgrading of clinical low grade tumors to pathological high grade.
RESULTS: At biopsy 61% of the patients had clinical high grade tumors and 21% had subepithelial connective tissue invasion (cT1+). On final pathology 79% of the patients had pathological high grade tumors and 45% had stage pT2 or greater. On multivariate analysis advanced patient age, clinical high grade and cT1+ were independently associated with pT2 or greater. The combined presence of clinical high grade and cT1+ had 86% positive predictive value for muscle invasion while the combined absence of clinical high grade and cT1+ had 80% negative predictive value. The likelihood of missing invasion on biopsy in patients with muscle invasive disease was increased when biopsy fragments were limited to 1 mm or less. Of clinical low grade cases on biopsy 51% were upgraded at surgery. The presence of positive urine cytology was associated with an increased risk of upgrading but this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical high grade, cT1+ on biopsy and advanced patient age are independent risk factors for muscle invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. There is a significant risk of upgrading in patients with clinical low grade tumors on biopsy, especially when urine cytology is positive. The predictive value of biopsy can likely be improved by more extensive ureteroscopic sampling.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; carcinoma; neoplasm grading; pathology; surgical; transitional cell; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427584     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Diagnostic ureteroscopy prior to nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma is associated with a high risk of bladder recurrence despite technical precautions to avoid tumor spillage.

Authors:  Michael Baboudjian; Khalid Al-Balushi; Floriane Michel; Francois Lannes; Akram Akiki; Sarah Gaillet; Veronique Delaporte; Evelyne Ragni; Harry Toledano; Gilles Karsenty; Dominique Rossi; Cyrille Bastide; Eric Lechevallier; Romain Boissier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in a Patient With Horseshoe Kidney.

Authors:  Aaron Brant; Nima Almassi; Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Paul Russo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  A case report of primary upper urinary tract signet-ring cell carcinoma and literature review.

Authors:  Zhaohua Ye; Qiwu Mi; Daosheng Luo; Zhixiong Li; Jiexin Luo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Development and external validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting pathological locally advanced disease of clinically localized upper urinary tract carcinoma.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshida; Takashi Kobayashi; Takayuki Kawaura; Makito Miyake; Katsuhiro Ito; Hiroshi Okuno; Takashi Murota; Noriyuki Makita; Mutsushi Kawakita; Gen Kawa; Tomoki Kitawaki; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Hiroaki Shiina; Haruhito Azuma; Osamu Ogawa; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Predicting invasiveness and disease-specific survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: identifying relevant clinical tumour characteristics.

Authors:  Camilla Malm; Alexandra Grahn; Georg Jaremko; Bernhard Tribukait; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment.

Authors:  Helene Jung; Guido Giusti; Harun Fajkovic; Thomas Herrmann; Robert Jones; Michael Straub; Joyce Baard; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Grzegorz Fojecki; Anders Magnusson; Olivier Traxer; Joyce Baard; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Georg Jaremko; Christian Seitz; Thomas Knoll; Guido Giusti; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Ureteroscopic biopsy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and role of urinary biomarkers.

Authors:  Katherine E Smentkowski; Demetrius H Bagley; Scott G Hubosky
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-08

9.  Can Endoscopic Appearance, Selective Cytology, and Pathological Sampling During Ureteroscopy Accurately Predict Tumor Grade of Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?

Authors:  Kamil Malshy; Omri Nativ; Ariel Zisman; Omer Sadeh; Azik Hoffman; Gilad E Amiel; Michael Mullerad
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2022-01-27

10.  Prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: results from a large multicenter international collaboration.

Authors:  Keiichiro Mori; Irene Resch; Noriyoshi Miura; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Satoshi Katayama; David D'Andrea; Mehdi Kardoust Parizi; Mohammad Abufaraj; Wataru Fukuokaya; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Stefano Luzzago; Sophie Knipper; Carlotta Palumbo; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Dmitry V Enikeev; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Shin Egawa; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.