Literature DB >> 2942707

Comparison of diethylstilbestrol, cyproterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: final analysis of a randomized phase III trial of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group.

M Pavone-Macaluso, H J de Voogt, G Viggiano, E Barasolo, B Lardennois, M de Pauw, R Sylvester.   

Abstract

Patients with previously untreated category T3 to T4 Mo or Ml prostatic cancer were allocated randomly to receive 250 mg. cyproterone acetate per day, a loading dose of 500 mg. medroxyprogesterone acetate intramuscularly 3 times weekly for 8 weeks followed by 100 mg. orally twice daily, or 1 mg. diethylstilbestrol 3 times daily in a phase III trial (protocol 30761) performed by the genitourinary tract cooperative group of the European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer. Of 236 patients entered 210 were eligible: 75 received cyproterone acetate, 71 medroxyprogesterone acetate and 64 diethylstilbestrol. Local and distant tumor response, time to progression, survival and toxicity were assessed. Patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate had a less favorable course with a shorter duration of survival and time to progression than those treated with the other 2 drugs. There was no significant difference between diethylstilbestrol and cyproterone acetate. Cardiovascular side effects were reported more often in patients treated with diethylstilbestrol than in those treated with cyproterone acetate but severe and lethal cardiovascular toxicity was relatively low in all groups. Other side effects were negligible. Further studies are required to establish the influence of effective hormonal treatment upon survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2942707     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44996-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

Review 1.  A history of prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Samuel R Denmeade; John T Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  [Problems and principles of hormone therapy of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  J E Altwein; P Faul
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-04-02

3.  The current status of adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Armstrong
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Cyproterone acetate monotherapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  O Kayigil; O Atahan; A Metin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiandrogens and their efficacy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Mahler; J Verhelst; L Denis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Combination therapy in stage C and D prostatic cancer: rationale and five year clinical experience.

Authors:  F Labrie; A Dupont; A Bélanger; L Cusan; M Giguère; Y Lacourcière; I Luthy; D Bégin; C Labrie; J Simard
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 7.  Antiandrogens in prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Reid; P Kantoff; W Oh
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Estrogen in patients with prostatic cancer. An assessment of the risks and benefits.

Authors:  P Henriksson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Experiences with doxo/epirubicin and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  C Anderström
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Cyproterone. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  L B Barradell; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.