| Literature DB >> 29426800 |
Morteza Nakhaei Amroodi1, Mostafa Salariyeh2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of single-incision Eden-Lange procedure in trapezius muscle paralysis.Entities:
Keywords: Eden-Lange procedure; Paralysis; Spinal accessory nerve; Trapezius muscle
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29426800 PMCID: PMC6136329 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ISSN: 1017-995X Impact factor: 1.511
Fig. 1(a) Photograph shows previous site of biopsy from cervical lymph node, (b, c) atrophy of trapezius muscle, (d) Limited range of motion in abduction.
Fig. 2(a) Levator scapulae, rhomboid minor and major muscles (from left to right respectively) were detached of the scapula with a small fragment of bones, (b) Drill holes in scapula for reattaching rhomboid muscles, (c) reattached all three muscles.
Patient's demographics data.
| Case no | Sex | Age (years) | Dominant hand | Involved limb | mechanism | Follow-up period (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 52 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 40 |
| 2 | Male | 37 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 28 |
| 3 | Male | 26 | Right | Right | Stab wound | 26 |
| 4 | Male | 36 | Left | Right | Blunt trauma | 36 |
| 5 | Female | 45 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 48 |
| 6 | Male | 25 | Right | Right | Biopsy | 30 |
| 7 | Male | 33 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 24 |
| 8 | Female | 57 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 34 |
| 9 | Male | 51 | Right | Right | Biopsy | 42 |
| 10 | Male | 30 | Right | Left | Biopsy | 31 |
| 11 | Male | 59 | Right | Right | Biopsy | 27 |
Shoulder scores and range of motions.
| Case no | Pre-op ASES | Post-op ASES | Pre-op VAS score | Post-op VAS score | Pre-op active FE | Post-op active FE | Pre-op active Abd | Post-op active Abd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30.80 | 75.00 | 8 | 3 | 120 | 150 | 40 | 140 |
| 2 | 30.60 | 83.20 | 9 | 2 | 110 | 160 | 80 | 160 |
| 3 | 34.00 | 81.60 | 8 | 2 | 130 | 160 | 90 | 150 |
| 4 | 37.4 | 93.20 | 7 | 0 | 140 | 160 | 80 | 150 |
| 5 | 30.80 | 85.00 | 8 | 1 | 130 | 150 | 80 | 140 |
| 6 | 16.20 | 72.00 | 9 | 2 | 120 | 160 | 90 | 160 |
| 7 | 37.20 | 78.40 | 8 | 2 | 110 | 150 | 90 | 160 |
| 8 | 24.40 | 85.00 | 8 | 1 | 120 | 150 | 80 | 140 |
| 9 | 37.40 | 86.80 | 7 | 0 | 130 | 160 | 60 | 150 |
| 10 | 47.20 | 81.60 | 6 | 2 | 120 | 160 | 100 | 140 |
| 11 | 35.60 | 81.40 | 8 | 3 | 110 | 140 | 90 | 140 |
| Mean | 32.87 | 82.10 | 7.8 | 1.6 | 121.80 | 154.40 | 80.00 | 148.18 |
| SD | 7.98 | 5.74 | 0.87 | 1.02 | 9.8 | 6.8 | 16.73 | 8.73 |
ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder; VAS = visual analogue scale; op = operative; FE = Forward Elevation; ER = External Rotation; Abd = Abduction.
Fig. 3(a) Improvement of neck- shoulder appearance, (b) shoulder ROM in abduction, (c) surgical scar 6 months after surgery in the patient presented in figure 1.