Literature DB >> 29426646

Effect of 3 Bioceramic Materials on Stem Cells of the Apical Papilla Proliferation and Differentiation Using a Dentin Disk Model.

Amber A Miller1, Koyo Takimoto2, James Wealleans1, Anibal Diogenes3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a complex interaction between biomaterials placed as a coronal barrier with stem cells and dentin in regenerative procedures. In this study, the effect of Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint-Maurdes-Fossés, France), Endosequence BC Root Repair Material-Putty (ES; Brasseler, Savannah, GA), Endosequence BC Root Repair Material-Putty Fast set (ES-fast, Brasseler), and ProRoot (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Johnson City, TN) mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) on the viability and differentiation of stem cells of the apical papilla (SCAP) was evaluated using an ex vivo dentin disk model.
METHODS: Standardized human dentin disks were treated using an established protocol. Disk lumens were filled with BD, ES, ES-fast, or MTA, and SCAP were cultured directly onto the samples. Cell viability was measured at 7 days, whereas differentiation into a mineralizing phenotype was evaluated by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and alizarin red staining at 21 days in culture. Results were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni post hoc test or the Mann-Whitney U test (P ≤ .05).
RESULTS: All materials promoted SCAP viability and proliferation with a greater response in the BD and ES groups. Also, a greater expression of alkaline phosphatase messenger RNA and dentin sialophosphoprotein was noted in the BD and ES groups, whereas MTA promoted a greater expression of the osteoblastic marker IBSP. Interestingly, no difference in alizarin red staining was observed with MTA, BD, or ES, which were significantly greater than ES-fast.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that BD and ES promoted greater survival and differentiation of SCAP and the increase of the odontoblastic marker DSPP, whereas MTA appeared to promote greater osteoblastic differentiation. Thus, BD and ES can be considered for regenerative and vital pulp therapies.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Endodontists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29426646     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  The tooth on-a-chip: a microphysiologic model system mimicking the biologic interface of the tooth with biomaterials.

Authors:  Cristiane Miranda França; Anthony Tahayeri; Nara Sousa Rodrigues; Shirin Ferdosian; Regina Maria Puppin Rontani; Grigoriy Sereda; Jack L Ferracane; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Biodentine but not MTA induce DSPP expression of dental pulp cells with different severity of LPS-induced inflammation.

Authors:  Min-Ching Wang; Kuo-Wei Chang; Shu-Chun Lin; Pei-Shih Hung
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  In vitro biocompatibility and bioactivity of calcium silicate‑based bioceramics in endodontics (Review).

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Shue Li; Qingming Tang; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.101

4.  Revitalization of necrotic mature permanent incisors with apical periodontitis: a case report.

Authors:  Emre Nagas; M Ozgur Uyanik; Zafer C Cehreli
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-07-05

5.  The additive effect of iloprost on the biological properties of Mineral trioxide aggregate on mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Alanoud Almeshari; Mona Elsafadi; Randa Almadhari; Amer Mahmood; Sara Alsubait; Hacer Aksel
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 6.  Viability and Stimulation of Human Stem Cells from the Apical Papilla (hSCAPs) Induced by Silicate-Based Materials for Their Potential Use in Regenerative Endodontics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José Luis Sanz; Leopoldo Forner; Alicia Almudéver; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Carmen Llena
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  In vivo Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Calcium Silicate-Based Bioceramics in Endodontics.

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Wei Sun; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-29

8.  Comparison of MTA versus Biodentine in Apexification Procedure for Nonvital Immature First Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yasser Alsayed Tolibah; Chaza Kouchaji; Thuraya Lazkani; Ibrahim Ali Ahmad; Ziad D Baghdadi
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.