Literature DB >> 29426632

Comparison of thermodilution and indirect Fick cardiac outputs in pulmonary hypertension.

Abdullah Alkhodair1, Michael Y C Tsang1, John A Cairns1, John R Swiston2, Robert D Levy2, Lisa Lee2, Victor F Huckell1, Nathan W Brunner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accurate measurement of cardiac output (CO) is required in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).While both the thermodilution (TDCO) and indirect Fick (IFCO) methods are commonly used, there is little data comparing them in patients with PH.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated at our center. All patients who had right heart catheterization (RHC) within 3 months of an echocardiogram, and CO assessment by both TDCO and IFCO methods were included. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between the two methods. We further evaluated their agreement in each sex, and within tertiles of age, BMI and TR severity. We investigated the correlation between each method of CO and objective parameters of right ventricular function on echocardiography.
RESULTS: In a cohort of 168 patients, the correlation between IFCO and TDCO was modest at (r = 0.61). On average, values for CO were lower with IFCO than with TDCO, by 0.62 L/min (95% CI -0.82, -0.40). This difference was greater for females: 0.86 L/min (95% CI -1.08, -0.63) and in the highest tertile of BMI: 0.97 L/min (95% CI -1.4, -0.55). Moderate and severe TR did not in general result in lower TDCO values. Echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function were correlated more strongly with TDCO than with IFCO.
CONCLUSION: In PH patients, IFCO was substantially lower than TDCO on average, suggesting that these two techniques cannot be used interchangeably. TDCO correlated more strongly with echocardiographic measures of RV function, suggesting that it may be preferred over IFCO.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29426632     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Determination Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Thermodilution in Pulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Lindsey A Crowe; Léon Genecand; Anne-Lise Hachulla; Stéphane Noble; Maurice Beghetti; Jean-Paul Vallée; Frédéric Lador
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Felix Troger; Ivan Lechner; Martin Reindl; Christina Tiller; Magdalena Holzknecht; Mathias Pamminger; Christian Kremser; Johannes Schwaiger; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Axel Bauer; Bernhard Metzler; Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Body Habitus Considerations During Right Heart Catheterization.

Authors:  Natasha R Girdharry; Robert F Bentley; Felipe H Valle; Elizabeth Karvasarski; Sinan Osman; Vikram Gurtu; Shimon Kolker; Susanna Mak
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in an elderly cohort of patients: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Alessandro Faragli; Dawud Abawi; Oliver Paul; Burkert Pieske; Heiner Post; Alessio Alogna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.