| Literature DB >> 29426406 |
Isabelle Desjardins1, Aurélien Joulié2, Sophie Pradier3, Sylvie Lecollinet4, Cécile Beck4, Laurence Vial5, Philippe Dufour6, Patrick Gasqui7, Loïc Legrand8, Sophie Edouard9, Karim Sidi-Boumedine6, Elodie Rousset6, Elsa Jourdain7, Agnès Leblond10.
Abstract
Coxiella burnetii can infect many animal species, but its circulation dynamics in and through horses is still unclear. This study evaluated horse exposure in an area known to be endemic for ruminants and humans. We assessed antibody prevalence in horse serum by ELISA, and screened by qPCR horse blood, ticks found on horses and dust from stables. Horse seroprevalence was 4% (n = 335, 37 stables) in 2015 and 12% (n = 294, 39 stables) in 2016. Of 199 horses sampled both years, 13 seroconverted, eight remained seropositive, and one seroreverted. Seropositive horses were located close to reported human cases, yet none displayed Q fever-compatible syndromes. Coxiella DNA was detected in almost 40% of collected ticks (n = 59/148 in 2015; n = 103/305 in 2016), occasionally in dust (n = 3/46 in 2015; n = 1/14 in 2016) but never in horse blood. Further studies should be implemented to evaluate if horses may be relevant indicators of zoonotic risk in urban and suburban endemic areas.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Horse; Q fever; Surveillance; Zoonosis; qPCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29426406 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.11.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293