Literature DB >> 29426392

Effects of Lighting on Reading Speed as a Function of Letter Size.

William Seiple1, Olga Overbury2, Bruce Rosenthal3, Tiffany Arango4, J Vernon Odom5, Alan R Morse6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine under what conditions brighter lighting improves reading performance.
METHOD: Thirteen participants with typical sight and 9 participants with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) read sentences ranging from 0.0 to 1.3 logMAR under luminance levels ranging from 3.5 to 696 cd/m².
RESULTS: At the dimmest luminance level (3.5 cd/m²), reading speeds were slowest at the smaller letter sizes and reached an asymptote for larger sizes. When luminance was increased to 30 cd/m², reading speed increased only for the smaller letter sizes. Additional lighting did not increase reading speeds for any letter size. Similar size-related effects of luminance were observed in participants with AMD.
CONCLUSION: In some instances, performance on acuity-limited tasks might be improved by brighter lighting. However, brighter lighting does not always improve reading; the magnitude of the effect depends on the text size and the relative changes in light level.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29426392      PMCID: PMC5807403          DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2018.021873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  18 in total

1.  The Effect of Variations in Intensity of Illumination on Acuity, Speed of Discrimination, Speed of Accommodation, and Other Important Eye Functions.

Authors:  C E Ferree; G Rand
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1921

2.  Reading performance with various lamps in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  F Eperjesi; C Maiz-Fernandez; H E Bartlett
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Optimal illumination for reading in patients with age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  K B Eldred
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Characterizing functional complaints in patients seeking outpatient low-vision services in the United States.

Authors:  Jamie C Brown; Judith E Goldstein; Tiffany L Chan; Robert Massof; Pradeep Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  High illumination as an auxiliary reading aid in diseases of the macula.

Authors:  L L Sloan; A Habel; K Feiock
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The photopic acuity-luminance function with special reference to parafoveal vision.

Authors:  L L Sloan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; I L Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Illumination and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Carolyn Meek; Nicola Stewart
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Quality of light and quality of life--the effect of lighting adaptation among people with low vision.

Authors:  Gunilla Brunnström; Stefan Sörensen; Karin Alsterstad; Johan Sjöstrand
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Test-retest Variability of a Standardized Low Vision Lighting Assessment.

Authors:  Walter Wittich; Lorie St Amour; Jonathan Jarry; William Seiple
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Reading in the presence of macular disease: a mini-review.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Altered eye movements during reading under degraded viewing conditions: Background luminance, text blur, and text contrast.

Authors:  Haojue Yu; Foroogh Shamsi; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.