Literature DB >> 29426306

Characteristics of people living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis in 2010 and projections to 2020.

Stefano Guzzinati1, Saverio Virdone2, Roberta De Angelis3, Chiara Panato2, Carlotta Buzzoni4,5, Riccardo Capocaccia6, Silvia Francisci3, Anna Gigli7, Manuel Zorzi8, Giovanna Tagliabue9, Diego Serraino2, Fabio Falcini10, Claudia Casella11, Antonio Giampiero Russo12, Fabrizio Stracci13, Bianca Caruso14, Maria Michiara15, Anna Luisa Caiazzo16, Marine Castaing17, Stefano Ferretti18, Lucia Mangone19, Giuseppa Rudisi20, Flavio Sensi21, Guido Mazzoleni22, Fabio Pannozzo23, Rosario Tumino24, Mario Fusco25, Paolo Ricci26, Gemma Gola27, Adriano Giacomin28, Francesco Tisano29, Giuseppa Candela30, Anna Clara Fanetti31, Filomena Pala32, Antonella Sutera Sardo33, Massimo Rugge8,34, Laura Botta6, Luigino Dal Maso35.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimates of cancer prevalence are widely based on limited duration, often including patients living after a cancer diagnosis made in the previous 5 years and less frequently on complete prevalence (i.e., including all patients regardless of the time elapsed since diagnosis). This study aims to provide estimates of complete cancer prevalence in Italy by sex, age, and time since diagnosis for all cancers combined, and for selected cancer types. Projections were made up to 2020, overall and by time since diagnosis.
METHODS: Data were from 27 Italian population-based cancer registries, covering 32% of the Italian population, able to provide at least 7 years of registration as of December 2009 and follow-up of vital status as of December 2013. The data were used to compute the limited-duration prevalence, in order to estimate the complete prevalence by means of the COMPREV software.
RESULTS: In 2010, 2,637,975 persons were estimated to live in Italy after a cancer diagnosis, 1.2 million men and 1.4 million women, or 4.6% of the Italian population. A quarter of male prevalent cases had prostate cancer (n = 305,044), while 42% of prevalent women had breast cancer (n = 604,841). More than 1.5 million people (2.7% of Italians) were alive since 5 or more years after diagnosis and 20% since ≥15 years. It is projected that, in 2020 in Italy, there will be 3.6 million prevalent cancer cases (+ 37% vs 2010). The largest 10-year increases are foreseen for prostate (+ 85%) and for thyroid cancers (+ 79%), and for long-term survivors diagnosed since 20 or more years (+ 45%). Among the population aged ≥75 years, 22% will have had a previous cancer diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of persons living after a cancer diagnosis is estimated to rise of approximately 3% per year in Italy. The availability of detailed estimates and projections of the complete prevalence are intended to help the implementation of guidelines aimed to enhance the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors and to contribute their rehabilitation needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer prevalence; Italy; Projections; Survivors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29426306      PMCID: PMC5807846          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4053-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Estimates of cancer prevalence are widely based on limited duration prevalence, including only patients living after a cancer diagnosis made in the previous 5 years [1, 2]. Prevalence, regardless of the time since diagnosis (i.e., complete prevalence), is less frequently estimated than limited duration prevalence [3-9]. Overall age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality rates have declined over the past 10 years in the majority of high income countries, whereas the complete prevalence has been consistently increasing in the early 2000s [3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11]. Complete prevalence is generally measured in absolute numbers and proportions, i.e., not age-standardized. Thus, improved survival [12, 13] and population ageing (increasing absolute number of new cancer diagnoses) imply a progressive increase in tumour prevalence. Cancer prevalence includes patients currently treated for cancer; those who have become cancer free, but still have a measurable excess risk of recurrence or death; and, finally, patients having death rates similar to those of the general population who can be considered “cured patients” [14]. Many of these individuals are possibly affected by physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial limitations [15]. The aim of this study was to provide a description of the number of people living in Italy at January 1, 2010 after a cancer diagnosis, for all cancers combined and for a selection of cancer types by sex, age, and time since diagnosis. In addition, projections of cancer prevalence in Italy are presented up to the year 2020. Estimates and projections of complete tumour prevalence and characteristics of prevalent patients are necessary to help clinicians and health care planners in improving long-term care of patients and in allocating appropriately health care resources. Moreover, they may provide helpful information to a growing number of cancer patients or former patients.

Methods

Study design and data sources

This is a descriptive analysis of individual data collected during the period 1976-2009 from 27 population-based Italian cancer registries (i.e., 32% of the entire Italian population in 2010), which agreed to participate in the study and were able to provide at least 7 years of cancer registration as of December 31, 2009 (Appendix 1) and follow-up of vital status as of December 31, 2013. The Italian legislation identifies Cancer Registries as collectors of personal data for surveillance purposes without explicit individual consent. The approval of a research ethic committee is not required, since this descriptive study was conducted without any direct or indirect intervention on patients. Prevalence for all malignant tumours (ICD-10: C00-C43, C45-C96) and 34 cancer types or their combinations were estimated and presented in this study for all age groups. Urinary bladder cancers with benign or uncertain behaviour, and in situ tumours were also included. Only non melanoma skin cancers (ICD-10 C44) were excluded. ICD-O-3 morphology codes were used to define specific subtypes.

Statistical methods

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the persons registered with a diagnosis of cancers in the Italian CRs were used to estimate: 1) how many of them were still alive at January 1, 2010 regardless of time since diagnosis -i.e., complete prevalence count- by cancer type, sex, and age group; 2) the prevalence proportion in Italy at 2010 for each cancer type, by sex, and age; 3) the complete prevalence (count and proportion) at 1st January 2015 and 2020, overall and by time since diagnosis; and 4) describe the changing over time of these estimates. For each cancer registry we computed the limited duration prevalence, i.e. the number of patients diagnosed in the period of the registration activity (between 7 and 34 years) at January 1, 2010, using the counting method implemented in SEER*Stat software [16]. This maximum limited duration prevalence was corrected, using the COMPREV software [17], by means of completeness index [18, 19], to estimate the total number of cancer patients alive, regardless of when they were diagnosed. Completeness indices were estimated by cancer type, sex, age, and time since diagnosis. Prevalence was computed as an absolute number, as well as a proportion per 100,000 residents people by cancer type, sex, age group, area of residence, and years since diagnosis. Patients with more than one primary cancer were included in the computation of prevalence for each cancer type or combination. In the analyses for all types combined, only the first cancer was considered. Completeness indices were obtained by statistical regression models of incidence and survival using data from 8 long-term registries (Appendix 1) with an available observation period of at least 18 years before 2010 [20, 21]. Relative survival and incidence functions were estimated by means of parametric models within the period 1985-2011 for survival and 1985-2009 for incidence. The survival model was a parametric cure model assuming that a proportion of individuals with cancer were bound to die (fatal cases) with a survival following a Weibull distribution, while the remaining proportion (cured fraction) had the same mortality rate as that of the general population with the same age and gender stratification [14, 20]. The parameters of the survival model were estimated by cancer type, sex, and age class (0-14, 15-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75+ years) through the SAS procedure NLIN. A period effect was included on the hazard of dying of cancer. Incidence data were categorised according to cancer type, sex, five-year age group, and birth cohort (< 1899, 1900-1904,…, 2005-2009). A sixth degree polynomial age-cohort model of crude incidence rates was fitted through the SAS LOGISTIC procedure for each cancer type and sex [21]. Complete prevalence proportions were projected to 2020 by cancer type, sex, age, and registry, assuming that complete prevalence will follow a linear function, based on the trend of the last three calendar years (i.e., 2007-2009). This simplified assumption (linear and constant trend) may not be valid for long-term projections, but it is reasonable for short or medium-term (e.g., 10-year) ones. Other assumptions (e.g., log-linear models) were explored [4, 6], showing consistent results for common cancer types, but unstable projections for the rarest. The absolute number of prevalent cases in Italy was obtained using proportions of prevalence estimates (age-, sex-, and cancer type-specific) from CRs included in this study, multiplied by the Italian national population by sex and age observed at January 1, 2010. Proportions projected to 2020 were thus multiplied to Italian population forecasted at January 1, 2020 [22].

Results

Prevalence estimates at 2010

In Italy in 2010, 2,637,975 persons were alive after a cancer diagnosis, corresponding to 4.6% of all the Italian population (Appendix 2). Prevalence proportions increase with age: 3.1% at age 45-54 years, 6.6% at 55-64 years, 12.1% at 65-74 years, and nearly 17% after age 75 years (Appendix 2) with differences by sex (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian men at January 1, 2010

Cancer typePrevalent casesPrevalence proportion per 100,000 men
All ages%00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+All ages00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+
All types but skin non-melanoma1,194,033484484,17287,091198,505363,932357,05198,43942501117322079571513,02920,53421,955
Upper aero-digestive tract26,7452.2%1916543320653680635786136710001584199311337313
Esophagus30670.3%05425272211057811531201723455140
Stomach45,9703.8%27642583666113,61816,538580215806581804709261268
Small intestine33840.3%02213507609878502161302823385246
Colon, rectum, anus185,53215.5%32718872229,33259,93163,69821,130654023210840210836184682
Liver17,4541.5%573171539383163474752610632337110228280142
Biliary tract42510.4%0702387131365144342115006204780103
Pancreas58560.5%319859813831876146233621021439698475
Larynx44,8103.8%02362105839915,08214,81941691600251240540854965
Lung63,0485.3%16804277111,01422,76521,682399621907643067871229890
Thymus, heart, mediastinum22900.2%423844355485163313371391418189
Bone48080.4%152191092477159641837163162021192210
Skin melanoma44,9773.8%2167307411981711,11778672014165061181291408470488
Mesothelioma20900.2%07212745791346654801313342712
Kaposi sarcoma56110.5%356765886412551498766210517264690174
Connective tissue11,7571.0%2262685169620432459200264741623415987111144
Penis42850.4%091413795130912554221401922456884
Prostate305,04425.5%3438338734,764112,958122,37631,118111205881048413871436878
Testis37,9373.2%8617,116849553493317238911871332149197152128133243
Kidney62,8155.3%3142842560912,65219,61317,52442622267251343647031030984
Bladder192,61116.1%252802858228,94859,20470,74922,302686026204821210440745053
Choroidal melanoma18010.2%0115209365484519109701611183025
Brain and central nervous system16,1101.3%568539128812930252514233915413466581827866
Thyroid25,5122.1%31642858115876466523513498915613716516613680
Hodgkin lymphoma27,8212.3%165968554885229413326844379548312913914114899
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma56,8084.8%6298344875411,69113,80211,18524032031472206339501655574
Leukemias36,1053.0%1939762040865656805067032051124436594158276373444
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)12,7871.1%0326115826364050368093845032775143215207
Table 2

Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian women at January 1, 2010

Cancer typePrevalent casesPrevalence proportion per 100,000 women
All ages%00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+All ages00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+
All types but skin non-melanoma1,443,9423903112,527176,656277,374363,646357,146152,6904836939884095749611,24313,99414,500
Upper aero-digestive tract15,4331.1%19156216873156369636241688540144187123148158
Esophagus11250.1%01710219934835810140036131611
Stomach35,5372.5%065118963992861912,95374261170541104254497698
Small intestine25970.2%0136277495688752250901614212928
Colon, rectum, anus171,84711.9%122754864024,51745,32259,47931,123571024204658137722872901
Liver73310.5%612583719432182292658925129256811458
Biliary tract55650.4%360286836151719329311800622447284
Pancreas62710.4%032649512391699173378021031133556869
Larynx44070.3%268364898121113585081601826415552
Lung23,7211.6%561123734933715866621980800653133224268186
Thymus, heart, mediastinum22120.2%61514406410443306727249912117
Bone91240.6%1002259216319501306973374283194347383832
Skin melanoma57,5154.0%3010,718992910,95011,65799534278198198237302372404432
Mesothelioma6740.0%018681482241744220024885
Kaposi sarcoma19900.1%01056019734975052870126123049
Connective tissue99170.7%20318931399181218901791929345173249627191
Breast604,84141.9%026,66382,068128,514165,456142,65859,4832046023619063516516456435751
Vagina and vulva96890.7%172565579822377357019313202132771137183
Cervix uteri58,8794.1%44321807310,56913,17715,6417093193038184280397591675
Corpus uteri (endometrium)103,3217.2%01490574521,04731,54831,15812,33334201313555396411981147
Ovary45,6203.2%654058661710,54411,39997293209149134154276352372291
Kidney35,2502.4%411236928415290946110,650422912292168149293436418
Bladder47,8223.3%613622562610111,41016,786959416401262172359676897
Choroidal melanoma17130.1%014921029444541420260149141821
Brain and central nervous system23,1451.6%5016210366135653875397813557212528296114133105
Thyroid93,3416.5%6822,81321,80521,59716,956857815243072199498571521356153
Hodgkin lymphoma20,4331.4%10291163990310422221401498672799384675843
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma53,9073.7%2625635662610,91713,61512,7314120181649153290422505407
Leukemias31,1962.2%1450744534654400562660672742101346478115166235256
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)12,2780.9%0217887236736113814138241022264112150124
Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian men at January 1, 2010 Complete cancer prevalence by cancer type and age in Italian women at January 1, 2010 Men living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis in 2010 were 1,194,033, corresponding to 4.3% (4250/100,000) of all Italian male population (Table 1). This proportion increased from less than 1% below the age of 45 years, to > 20% for men aged ≥75 years. The most frequent tumours in terms of prevalence were prostate (305,044 of prevalent cases at January, 1st 2010) representing 25.5% of all cases or 1.1% of all Italian men, followed by bladder (192,611 men, 16.1%) and colorectal (185,532 men, 15.5%) tumours. Italian women living after a cancer diagnosis were 1,443,942 (Table 2), corresponding to 4.8% of all Italian women. Breast cancer represented 41.9% of all cancers (604,841), followed by colorectal cancers (171,847, 11.9% of all female prevalent cases, 0.6% of all Italian women) and by endometrial cancers (103,321, 7.2% and 0.3%, respectively). Notably, the fourth most frequent cancer type diagnosed in Italian prevalent women is thyroid (93,341 women, 6.5% of all female prevalent cases). Prevalent women were younger than men. Women aged 15-44 years living after a diagnosis represented 1% of the whole Italian population, they were 4% at ages 45-54 years, 7% at ages 55-64 years, 11% at ages 65-74 years, and 14% for women aged ≥75 years (Table 2). More than 1.5 million people (i.e., 2.7% of all Italian residents) were alive after ≥5 years since diagnosis. They were 60% of all prevalent cases, 64% of women and 55% of men. The distribution of prevalent cases by time since diagnosis depends on cancer type (Fig. 1). The percentage of prevalent cases diagnosed since less than 2 years varied from 39% for lung cancer patients to 15% for female breast and 7% for cervical cancer patients. Conversely, the percentage of prevalent cases diagnosed ≥15 years before was 59% for cervical cancer, 35% for stomach cancer and 31% for endometrial cancer, but only 4% for prostate and 13% for lung cancer patients. Notably, patients diagnosed ≥15 years before were 21% of all prevalent cases (16% among men and 25% among women).
Fig. 1

Complete prevalence by time since diagnosis for selected cancer types* in Italy at January 1, 2010. *Cancer types diagnosed in > 50,000 persons, sorted by number of cases

Complete prevalence by time since diagnosis for selected cancer types* in Italy at January 1, 2010. *Cancer types diagnosed in > 50,000 persons, sorted by number of cases

Prevalence projections for 2020

In 2020, there will be 3.6 million prevalent cancer cases in Italy (Table 3), 1.9 million women and 1.7 million men, with a 10-year increase of 37% (41 and 33% in men and women, respectively). In 2020, 2.6% of all Italian women (0.8 millions) will be alive after a breast cancer diagnosis and more than half a million patients (2.1% of all men) will be alive after a prostate cancer diagnosis (Table 3). The largest 10-year increases are foreseen for prostate (+ 85%) and for thyroid cancers (+ 79%, 212,863 cases), which will become the third most frequent prevalent cancer types among Italian women. A more than 50% increases are also expected in 2020 for prevalence after diagnosis of testicular cancer (63,395 patients) or skin melanoma (169,900). A limited change in prevalence (variations < 10%) is expected for ovary, larynx, and stomach, with cervical cancer being the only cancer type showing a decline in prevalence (− 13%) (Table 3).
Table 3

Projected complete prevalence (cases) at January 1,  2020 by sex and 10-year variations in Italy

Prevalent casesVariation (%)
202010-year period
Cancer TypeaMenWomenTotalMenWomenTotal
All types but skin non-melanoma1687,0491,922,0863,609,13541.3%33.1%36.8%
Upper aero-digestive tract36,08121,83157,91134.9%41.5%37.3%
Stomach50,32732,03382,3609.5%−9.9%1.0%
Colon, Rectum, Anus280,277233,245513,52251.1%35.7%43.7%
Liver25,234853133,76544.6%16.4%36.2%
Larynx47,015600653,0204.9%36.3%7.7%
Lung77,15940,657117,81622.4%71.4%35.8%
Skin Melanoma80,06989,831169,90078.0%56.2%65.8%
Connective Tissue17,04011,81528,85544.9%19.1%33.1%
Female Breast834,154834,15437.9%37.9%
Cervix Uteri51,13651,136−13.2%−13.2%
Corpus Uteri (endometrium)122,553122,55318.6%18.6%
Ovary49,80749,8079.2%9.2%
Prostate563,960563,96084.9%84.9%
Testis63,39563,39567.1%67.1%
Kidney97,24947,151144,40054.8%33.8%47.2%
Bladder255,01558,608313,62432.4%22.6%30.4%
Brain and central nervous system23,50529,31452,81945.9%26.7%34.6%
Thyroid45,949166,914212,86380.1%78.8%79.1%
Hodgkin Lymphoma37,69229,31467,00635.5%43.5%38.9%
Non- Hodgkin Lymphoma82,78073,584156,36445.7%36.5%41.2%
Leukaemias45,88039,10084,98027.1%25.3%26.3%
Multiple Myeloma19,47217,15936,63152.3%39.8%46.1%

a Cancer types with more than 20,000 prevalent cases at 2010

Projected complete prevalence (cases) at January 1,  2020 by sex and 10-year variations in Italy a Cancer types with more than 20,000 prevalent cases at 2010 Projected complete prevalence at January 1, 2020 by sex and age groups in Italy a a Most frequent cancer types are shown: Cancer types or combinations with > 100,000 prevalent cases Nearly 22% (21,657/100,000) of population aged ≥75 years in 2020 will have had a previous cancer diagnosis (Table 4). Below 45 years of age, prevalent cases will be 228,145 (i.e., 0.8% of all cases, 726/100,000) and, in both sexes, the most frequent cancer type will be thyroid cancer, experienced by 31,971 women and 9141 men.
Table 4

Projected complete prevalence at January 1, 2020 by sex and age groups in Italy a

SEX, Cancer typePrevalent casesPrevalence proportion per 100,000
All ages%00-4445-7475+All ages00-4445-7475+
MEN and WOMEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma3,609,135100.0%228,1451,897,5431,483,448573172616,38321,657
 Colon, rectum, anus513,52214.2%4954231,800276,7678081520803952
 Skin melanoma169,9004.7%24,038101,18044,68227176857673
 Female breast834,15423.1%29,758498,614305,781262220182157297
 Corpus uteri (endometrium)122,5533.4%170765,76555,0813791011041269
 Prostate563,96015.6%1174255,514307,272205612563412,343
 Bladder313,6248.7%4130128,332181,1625631513232836
 Thyroid212,8635.9%41,112145,56226,1893091271084379
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma156,3644.3%14,94887,25554,16124747739789
MEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma1687,049100%95,056834,967757,026544461515,67828,728
 Colon, rectum, anus280,27716.6%2250135,206142,8219021325735267
 Skin melanoma80,0694.7%876050,43720,87225657898815
 Prostate563,96033.4%1174255,514307,272205612563412,343
 Bladder255,01515.1%2636106,086146,2949582023235932
 Thyroid45,9492.7%914131,444536414259490209
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma82,7804.9%895949,51324,30927158871946
WOMEN
 All types but skin non-melanoma1,922,086100%133,0891,062,575726,422599288817,37417,007
 Colon, rectum, anus233,24512.1%270496,594133,9477201716333105
 Skin melanoma89,8314.7%15,27850,74223,811284102822581
 Breast834,15443.4%29,758498,614305,781262220182157297
 Corpus uteri (endometrium)122,5536.4%170765,76555,0813791011041269
 Bladder58,6083.0%149422,24634,86819510405859
 Thyroid166,9148.7%31,971114,11920,8255082181761516
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma73,5843.8%598937,74329,85222537618688

a Most frequent cancer types are shown: Cancer types or combinations with > 100,000 prevalent cases

Prevalent cases diagnosed within 2 years were the only group showing a negligible increase from 2010 to 2020 (+ 3% in the examined period), while a 19% increase was observed for cases diagnosed between 2 and 5 years before, 30-34% for cases diagnosed between 5 and 20 years earlier, and 45% increased for long-term survivors diagnosed ≥20 years before (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Complete cancer prevalence (proportions) in Italy from 2006 to 2020 by years since diagnosis. *Data for 2006 obtained from ref. 21. Filled symbols (e.g., •) represent estimated values, empty symbols (e.g., ο) represent projected values

Complete cancer prevalence (proportions) in Italy from 2006 to 2020 by years since diagnosis. *Data for 2006 obtained from ref. 21. Filled symbols (e.g., •) represent estimated values, empty symbols (e.g., ο) represent projected values

Discussion

In 2010, 2.6 million people were living in Italy after a cancer diagnosis and this number will reach 3.6 million in 2020, increasing from 4.6% to 5.7% (i.e., one out of 17 Italians) of the overall population. The estimated overall trend in the present decade in Italy (+ 3.2% per year) is comparable to that estimated in the same period in the USA (+ 2.8% per year) [5], UK (+ 3.3%) [4], and Switzerland (+ 2.5%) [6]. The expected 37% increase in the present decade in Italy will be more marked (i.e., nearly + 50%) among long-term survivors diagnosed ≥20 years before; they will be more than half a million in Italy (519,356), 14% of all prevalent cases (11% in men and 18% in women). Most of them can be considered as cured since they had already reached a similar life expectancy (i.e., death rates) of the corresponding general population [14]. A higher proportion of women (55%) than that of men emerged among prevalent cancer cases at 2010 in the present Italian study, in agreement with findings from most studies conducted in other countries [4–6, 9] but France (where 53% were men, 6.4% of the French population) [8]. In Italy, female breast cancer cases represented 23% of all prevalent cases, and affected the distribution of cancer prevalence by age. The thyroid cancer epidemic in Italy also contributed to an excess in females, below age 45 years thyroid cancer was the most frequent prevalent type in 2010 (29,340 men and women), and this number will substantially increase to more than 41,000 in 2020. It should be noted, however, that a large proportion of thyroid cancer incidence and prevalence may be affected by overdiagnosis; i.e., the detection of cancer cases that would not otherwise result in causing symptoms or deaths [23, 24]. An important role on variation of cancer prevalence is played by screening programmes, inducing a reduction of cervical and colorectal prevalent cancers cases, while early detection of breast and prostate cancers may inflate number of prevalent cases [25]. In particular, screening can prevent cervical cancer, with a consequent major effect on prevalence reduction, i.e., − 13% in 10 years in the present study. Distribution of cancer prevalence by age is also noteworthy. In 2010, 37% of prevalent patients were 75 years or older (38% in men, 35% in women). In this age group, they will reach 41% in 2020, with more than 20% of men and 14% of women will have experienced a previous cancer diagnosis. These proportions were similar to those reported by other studies, showing also that elderly cancer patients had more severe comorbidity conditions than non cancer patients [26]. At the opposite end of the age spectrum, 8% of Italian prevalent cases were younger than 44 years of age and 10% were aged 45–54 years. It has been recently estimated that 44,135 persons living in Italy in 2010 had had a cancer diagnosis during childhood [27]; they represented 0.07% of the Italian population and 1.7% of prevalent cases diagnosed at any age. In similar studies conducted in the USA [28], a substantial proportion of morbidities emerged in childhood cancer patients several years after diagnosis, and there is growing awareness on potentially long-term risks affecting the survivors’ future physical, cognitive, and/or psychosocial health [29]. The impact of a cancer diagnosis is rather different between younger and older survivors, the first facing more pronounced socio-economic consequences [30, 31], as well as psychosocial impairments in fertility and sexuality [32, 33]. We acknowledge the several limitations of our analyses. First, data from Italian cancer registries (AIRTUM) included one third of the Italian population in 2010 and the representativeness for the national prevalence estimates may be questionable [34]. To overcome this issue, we adjusted estimated proportions in cancer registry areas for the age distribution of the whole Italian population. Moreover, since cancer registries have been active in Italy from a relatively recent time period, the complete prevalence has been estimated through statistical models. Notably, the validation of complete prevalence estimation by means of COMPREV method in Italy and elsewhere [19] is reasonably reassuring. In particular, the validation of COMPREV method shows negligible (i.e., < 5%) differences, when comparing observed prevalence for cancer registries with ≥30 years of observation and estimated prevalence using complete indexes applied to the same registries and truncated data [21, page 34]. On the other hand, the strengths of this population-based study are represented by the size of the study population, which included nearly 1.7 million incident cancer cases, and its long-term follow-up, more than a half of these cases were followed-up for > 20 years post diagnosis. In addition, data and period used were updated in the present study (see Appendix 1), including an additional number of years of observation and follow-up, in comparison with previous studies on the same topic [21]. The accuracy of future projections of prevalence is necessarily uncertain and lies on statistical models based on assumptions reflecting unknown evolution of incidence, survival, and demographic changes. This may also affect comparisons with trends reported in other countries, obtained using different assumptions and statistical models [4, 6, 26]. In our medium-term projections, the hypothesis that complete prevalence at 2020 can be predicted by a linear function of calendar year as regressor variable is supported by empirical evidence, at least for all cancer types combined and for most frequent cancer types, consistently showing an approximate linear trend in recent years [5, 21]. Notably, the use of a longer period (5 calendar years) to estimate linear slope did not materially modify the estimates. Detailed estimates and projections of numbers of persons living after different cancer diagnoses are particularly relevant for policy makers to better plan health care resource allocation and meet cancer patients needs, including not only initial treatment, but also rehabilitation and long-term surveillance. However, to date, guidelines pertaining to survivorship care have been largely based on consensus rather than on empirical evidence [35-37]. In the USA, the main driver of cancer costs growth is population ageing, with an overall increase of 27% by the year 2020 from 2010 levels [38]. The largest increase in expenditures is attributable to the continuing phase of care (i.e., > 1-year post-diagnosis and > 1 year from death) for prostate and female breast cancer, with 42 and 32% increase respectively [38]. Although health care costs in the continuing phase of care is lower than in the first course of treatment (first year since diagnosis) and in the last year of life, the large number of survivors in the continuing phase of care is driving most of healthcare resources. Similar findings, on the distribution of cancer burden by phase of care, are expected in Italy [39].

Conclusions

The availability of reliable and accurate estimates of complete prevalence and predictions of the rising tide of people living after cancer diagnosis may be helpful not only to epidemiologists and health-care planners, but also to clinicians in developing guidelines to enhance and standardize the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors. Furthermore, these estimates are intended for patients to help recovering social activities and supporting rehabilitation demands.

Population and incident cases in Italian cancer registries with ≥7 years of registration in period 1976-2009

CANCER REGISTRYPeriod of activityPopulation at January 1st 2010Incident cases up to 2009a
Period of registrationYears included to 2009(per 1000)
Alto Adige - Sudtirol1995–20101549437,119
Biella1995–20101518520,362
Catania-Messina2003–20117172758,753
Catanzaro2003–200972307755
Como2003–2011757724,963
Ferrarab1991–20111935450,925
Friuli Venezia Giulia1995–2010151219128,738
Genovab1986–200924592112,812
Latina1996–20111453132,330
Mantova1999–20101140427,541
Milano1999–2010111215103,283
Modenab1988–20112267684,155
Napoli1996–20111456128,250
Nuoro2003–201172197889
Palermo2003–20117123940,926
Parmab1978–20113242080,744
Ragusab1981–20112930331,283
Reggio Emilia1996–20111450841,379
Romagna1993–2011171058119,458
Salerno1996–200914108963,293
Sassarib1992–20111846737,988
Siracusa1999–20111140018,927
Sondrio1998–20111218113,003
Trapani2002–2009842915,591
Umbria1994–20111687585,138
Vareseb1976-201134860137,184
Venetob1990–2009202097245,898
All CRs18,9091,655,687
Italy59,190

a All types but skin non-melanoma

b CRs included to estimate model-based incidence and survival (47% of all cancer cases)

Complete cancer prevalence (cases and proportion) by cancer type and age at prevalence in Italian men and women at  January 1, 2010

Cancer typePrevalent casesPrevalence proportion ×  100,000a
All ages%00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+All ages00-1415-4445-5455-6465-7475-8485+
All types but skin non-melanoma2,637,9758747196,699263,746475,879727,578714,197251,12945521028593103663512,06816,62016,700
Upper aero-digestive tract42,1781.6%3832165007969211,759941030557601462142209224204
Esophagus41920.2%713549211453113925480515283020
Stomach81,5073.1%21415447910,65422,23729,49113,2291370649141354669866
Small intestine59810.2%356627125516751602466112718293833
Colon, rectum, anus357,37913.5%15547217,36253,849105,252123,17752,253611023207746171528213426
Liver24,7850.9%119575191047748529767811994313236614218083
Biliary tract98160.4%313152415492882337513521600621457590
Pancreas12,1280.5%35241093262235753194111621021236617571
Larynx49,2171.9%23042469929716,29316,1774676860129129271376321
Lung86,7693.3%211415514415,94729,92328,34359761470658216484654394
Thymus, heart, mediastinum45010.2%10389884295895963610571391115148
Bone13,9320.5%25141683087272119021391411223173234293226
Skin melanoma102,4923.9%5217,44817,33920,76722,77417,8206292182180210296388430448
Mesothelioma27630.1%90195605113764096502820157
Kaposi sarcoma76010.3%367271810611605224812941403916275486
Connective tissue21,6740.8%4294578309538554349379315763762037547487107
Female breast604,84122.9%26,66382,068128,514165,456142,65859,483204623619063516516456435751
Vagina and vulva96890.4%172565579822377357019313202132771137183
Cervix uteri58,8792.2%44321807310,56913,17715,6417093193038184280397591675
Corpus uteri (endometrium)103,3213.9%1490574521,04731,54831,15812,3333421313555396411981147
Ovary45,6201.7%654058661710,54411,39997293209149134154276352372291
Penis42850.2%9141379513091255422141922456884
Prostate305,04411.6%3438338734,764112,958122,37631,118111205881048413871436878
Testis37,9371.4%8617,116849553493317238911871332149197152128133243
Kidney98,0653.7%7255211845017,94129,07328,1748491172823101253483674585
Bladder240,4339.1%31416411,14435,04970,61487,53531,896416019132485116520412123
Choroidal melanoma35140.1%26441965892993331161510162322
Brain and central nervous system39,2551.5%106911,6026542649564005401174663134974899911194
Thyroid118,8534.5%9929,24127,61727,47421,62210,92918722021127321375357268131
Hodgkin lymphoma48,2541.8%26618,8019478833363554085935813811111101019459
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma110,7154.2%89113,97915,38022,60827,41723,91665231911061179314458565456
Leukemias67,3012.6%338915,065755110,05713,67612,7704793112396486136217291312
Multiple myeloma (plasma cell)25,0661.0%542204450037662749423204322469126176149

a For sex-specific types proportions were also sex-specific

  32 in total

Review 1.  Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Cancer survivors: a booming population.

Authors:  Carla Parry; Erin E Kent; Angela B Mariotto; Catherine M Alfano; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Worldwide Thyroid-Cancer Epidemic? The Increasing Impact of Overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Salvatore Vaccarella; Silvia Franceschi; Freddie Bray; Christopher P Wild; Martyn Plummer; Luigino Dal Maso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Survivors of childhood cancer in the United States: prevalence and burden of morbidity.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; Lynne S Padgett; Wendy M Leisenring; Kayla K Stratton; Ken Bishop; Kevin R Krull; Catherine M Alfano; Todd M Gibson; Janet S de Moor; Danielle Blanch Hartigan; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Julia H Rowland; Kevin C Oeffinger; Angela B Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).

Authors:  Claudia Allemani; Hannah K Weir; Helena Carreira; Rhea Harewood; Devon Spika; Xiao-Si Wang; Finian Bannon; Jane V Ahn; Christopher J Johnson; Audrey Bonaventure; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Charles Stiller; Gulnar Azevedo e Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Bernard Rachet; Matthew J Soeberg; Hui You; Tomohiro Matsuda; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Hans Storm; Thomas C Tucker; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  An estimate of the number of people in Italy living after a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Silvia Francisci; Stefano Guzzinati; Luigino Dal Maso; Carlotta Sacerdote; Carlotta Buzzoni; Anna Gigli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Adult survivors of childhood cancer: the medical and psychosocial late effects of cancer treatment and the impact on sexual and reproductive health.

Authors:  Linda A Jacobs; Donna A Pucci
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Cancer prevalence estimates in Europe at the beginning of 2000.

Authors:  G Gatta; S Mallone; J M van der Zwan; A Trama; S Siesling; R Capocaccia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Lonnie K Zeltzer; Qian Lu; Wendy Leisenring; Jennie C I Tsao; Christopher Recklitis; Gregory Armstrong; Ann C Mertens; Leslie L Robison; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Employment status and occupational level of adult survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain: The British childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Clare Frobisher; Emma R Lancashire; Helen Jenkinson; David L Winter; Julie Kelly; Raoul C Reulen; Michael M Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021.

Authors:  Ulrik Ringborg; Anton Berns; Julio E Celis; Manuel Heitor; Josep Tabernero; Joachim Schüz; Michael Baumann; Rui Henrique; Matti Aapro; Partha Basu; Regina Beets-Tan; Benjamin Besse; Fátima Cardoso; Fátima Carneiro; Guy van den Eede; Alexander Eggermont; Stefan Fröhling; Susan Galbraith; Elena Garralda; Douglas Hanahan; Thomas Hofmarcher; Bengt Jönsson; Olli Kallioniemi; Miklós Kásler; Eva Kondorosi; Jan Korbel; Denis Lacombe; José Carlos Machado; José M Martin-Moreno; Francoise Meunier; Péter Nagy; Paolo Nuciforo; Simon Oberst; Júlio Oliveiera; Maria Papatriantafyllou; Walter Ricciardi; Alexander Roediger; Bettina Ryll; Richard Schilsky; Grazia Scocca; Raquel Seruca; Marta Soares; Karen Steindorf; Vincenzo Valentini; Emile Voest; Elisabete Weiderpass; Nils Wilking; Amanda Wren; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Cancer-Related Psychological Distress in Lymphoma Survivor: An Italian Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Giulia Agostinelli; Barbara Muzzatti; Samantha Serpentini; Michele Spina; Maria Antonietta Annunziata
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 3.  The European Cancer Patient Coalition and its central role in connecting stakeholders to advance patient-centric solutions in the mission on cancer.

Authors:  Francesco de Lorenzo; Kathi Apostolidis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Cancer survivorship: an integral part of Europe's research agenda.

Authors:  Pernilla Lagergren; Anna Schandl; Neil K Aaronson; Hans-Olov Adami; Francesco de Lorenzo; Louis Denis; Sara Faithfull; Lifang Liu; Franḉoise Meunier; Cornelia Ulrich
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Prognosis and cure of long-term cancer survivors: A population-based estimation.

Authors:  Luigino Dal Maso; Chiara Panato; Stefano Guzzinati; Diego Serraino; Silvia Francisci; Laura Botta; Riccardo Capocaccia; Andrea Tavilla; Anna Gigli; Emanuele Crocetti; Massimo Rugge; Giovanna Tagliabue; Rosa Angela Filiberti; Giuliano Carrozzi; Maria Michiara; Stefano Ferretti; Rosaria Cesaraccio; Rosario Tumino; Fabio Falcini; Fabrizio Stracci; Antonietta Torrisi; Guido Mazzoleni; Mario Fusco; Stefano Rosso; Francesco Tisano; Anna Clara Fanetti; Giovanna Maria Sini; Carlotta Buzzoni; Roberta De Angelis
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Prognosis Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Sara Hurtado-Barroso; Marta Trius-Soler; Rosa M Lamuela-Raventós; Raul Zamora-Ros
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  The Economic Impact of Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Italy

Authors:  Anna Gigli; Silvia Francisci; Giulia Capodaglio; Daniela Pierannunzio; Sandra Mallone; Andrea Tavilla; Tania Lopez; Manuel Zorzi; Fabrizio Stracci; Susanna Busco; Walter Mazzucco; Sara Lonardi; Fortunato Bianconi; Antonio Giampiero Russo; Silvia Iacovacci; Diego Serraino; Gianfranco Manneschi; Mario Fusco; Rosanna Cusimano; Massimo Rugge; Stefano Guzzinati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Adherence to Mediterranean Diet, Physical Activity and Survival after Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Matteo Di Maso; Livia S A Augustin; Federica Toffolutti; Carmen Stocco; Luigino Dal Maso; David J A Jenkins; Neil E Fleshner; Diego Serraino; Jerry Polesel
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Patterns of care and cost profiles of women with breast cancer in Italy: EPICOST study based on real world data.

Authors:  Silvia Francisci; Stefano Guzzinati; Giulia Capodaglio; Daniela Pierannunzio; Sandra Mallone; Andrea Tavilla; Tania Lopez; Susanna Busco; Walter Mazzucco; Catia Angiolini; Manuel Zorzi; Diego Serraino; Alessandro Barchielli; Mario Fusco; Fabrizio Stracci; Fortunato Bianconi; Massimo Rugge; Silvia Iacovacci; Antonio Giampiero Russo; Rosanna Cusimano; Anna Gigli
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-12

10.  "My son can not attend the school because 5 classmates are unvaccinated". On the question of compulsory vaccinations and the risk for immune-compromised children into the schools: the case of paediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  Silvana Acquafredda; Silvio Tafuri
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.