Literature DB >> 29426204

Implications of a valuation study for ecological and social indicators associated with Everglades restoration.

Nadia A Seeteram1, Victor Engel2, Pallab Mozumder3.   

Abstract

The Everglades of south Florida, although degraded, imparts vital ecosystem benefits, including contributions to high quality drinking water supplies and habitat for a number of threatened and endangered species. Restoration of the Everglades can improve the provision of these benefits but also may impose tradeoffs with competing societal demands. This study focuses on understanding public preferences for Everglades restoration and estimating the willingness to pay (WTP) values for restored ecosystem services (ES) through the implementation of a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We collected data from 2302 respondents from the general public from an online survey designed to elicit WTP values for selected ecological and social attributes associated with Everglades restoration scenarios. We compare the findings to results from earlier studies (Milon et al., 1999; Milon and Scrogin, 2005), which also estimated WTP values among Floridians for Everglades restoration. For some attributes, WTP for Everglades restoration appears to have slightly increased while for others WTP appears to have decreased. We estimated statewide aggregate WTP values for components of species population restoration up to $2B over 10 years. Several factors impeded a direct comparison of current and historical WTP values, including time elapsed, different samples and sampling methods- which may have implications for integrating ecosystem service valuation studies into water management decisions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete choice experiment; Everglades restoration; Temporal stability; Willingness to pay

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29426204     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration.

Authors:  G Andrew Stainback; John H Lai; Elizabeth F Pienaar; Damian C Adam; Ruscena Wiederholt; Chloe' Vorseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Modelling welfare estimates in discrete choice experiments for seaweed-based renewable energy.

Authors:  Petr Mariel; Simona Demel; Alberto Longo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Organically Linking Green Development and Ecological Environment Protection in Poyang Lake, China Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework.

Authors:  Ji Feng; Zheng Zhao; Yali Wen; Yilei Hou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.