Takeshi Ide1, Yoshio Takesue2, Kazuro Ikawa3, Norifumi Morikawa3, Takashi Ueda2, Yoshiko Takahashi4, Kazuhiko Nakajima2, Kenta Takeda5, Shinichi Nishi5. 1. Division of Intensive Care Unit, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan. Electronic address: tide@hyo-med.ac.jp. 2. Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 4. Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan. 5. Division of Intensive Care Unit, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimum dosing regimen of linezolid in sepsis patients with and without renal dysfunction and sepsis patients on low-dose continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using a pharmacokinetics/pharmacokinetics (PK/PD) approach. METHODS: Sepsis patients with and without renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min), and sepsis patients on low-dose CRRT (dose: 800 mL/h) were studied. The PK data were modeled using a two-compartment model, and then used for simulation. The target PK/PD was the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio of ≥ 80. Dosing regimens were evaluated using cumulative fraction of response (CFR) and safety probability (trough level < 7 µg/mL) by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, including 8 patients with preserved renal function, 9 patients with renal dysfunction, and 10 patients on CRRT, were studied. The proposed regimen to attain CFR ≥ 90% was 800 mg every 12 h (safety probability 82.4%) for patients with preserved renal function. By contrast, the target CFR was attained with a decreased regimen in patients with renal dysfunction and those on CRRT [600 mg every 24h (safety probability 68.6%) and 800 mg every 24h (42.1%)]. CONCLUSIONS: We identified different dosage strategies to achieve target linezolid concentrations according to renal function and use of CRRT in sepsis patients. Because of unassured safety probability in patients without preserved renal function, dosing regimens should be adjusted based on the therapeutic drug monitoring.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimum dosing regimen of linezolid in sepsispatients with and without renal dysfunction and sepsispatients on low-dose continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using a pharmacokinetics/pharmacokinetics (PK/PD) approach. METHODS:Sepsispatients with and without renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min), and sepsispatients on low-dose CRRT (dose: 800 mL/h) were studied. The PK data were modeled using a two-compartment model, and then used for simulation. The target PK/PD was the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio of ≥ 80. Dosing regimens were evaluated using cumulative fraction of response (CFR) and safety probability (trough level < 7 µg/mL) by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, including 8 patients with preserved renal function, 9 patients with renal dysfunction, and 10 patients on CRRT, were studied. The proposed regimen to attain CFR ≥ 90% was 800 mg every 12 h (safety probability 82.4%) for patients with preserved renal function. By contrast, the target CFR was attained with a decreased regimen in patients with renal dysfunction and those on CRRT [600 mg every 24h (safety probability 68.6%) and 800 mg every 24h (42.1%)]. CONCLUSIONS: We identified different dosage strategies to achieve target linezolid concentrations according to renal function and use of CRRT in sepsispatients. Because of unassured safety probability in patients without preserved renal function, dosing regimens should be adjusted based on the therapeutic drug monitoring.
Authors: Wael A Alghamdi; Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Guohua An; Abdullah Alsultan; Maia Kipiani; Ketevan Barbakadze; Lali Mikiashvili; David Ashkin; David E Griffith; J Peter Cegielski; Russell R Kempker; Charles A Peloquin Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ahmed E Abou Warda; Rania M Sarhan; Hussein Saeed Al-Fishawy; Ayman N Moharram; Heba F Salem Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-02-28