Literature DB >> 29425716

Biological connective tissues exhibit viscoelastic and poroelastic behavior at different frequency regimes: Application to tendon and skin biophysics.

Ramin Oftadeh1, Brianne K Connizzo1, Hadi Tavakoli Nia2, Christine Ortiz3, Alan J Grodzinsky4.   

Abstract

In this study, a poroviscoelastic finite element model (FEM) was developed and used in conjunction with an AFM-based wide-bandwidth nanorheology system to predict the frequency-dependent mechanical behavior of tendon and dermis subjected to compression via nanoindentation. The aim was to distinguish between loading rates that are dominated by either poroelasticity, viscoelasticity, or the superposition of these processes. Using spherical probe tips having different radii, the force and tip displacement were measured and the magnitude, E∗, and phase angle, ϕ, of the dynamic complex modulus were evaluated for mouse supraspinatus tendon and mouse dermis. The peak frequencies of the phase angle were associated with the characteristic time constants of poroelastic and viscoelastic material behavior. The developed FE model could predict the separate poroelastic and viscoelastic responses of these soft tissues over a 4 decade frequency range, showing good agreement with experimental results. We observed that poroelasticity was the dominant energy dissipation mechanism for mouse dermis and supraspinatus tendon at higher indentation frequencies (102 to 104 Hz) whereas viscoelasticity was typically dominant at lower frequencies (<102 Hz). These findings show the underlying mechanical behavior of biological connective tissues and give insight into the role played by these different energy dissipation mechanisms in governing the function of these tissues at nanoscale. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Soft biological tissues exhibit complex, load- and time-dependent mechanical behavior. Evaluating their mechanical behavior requires sophisticated experimental tools and numerical models that can capture the fundamental mechanisms governing tissue function. Using an Atomic-force-microscopy-based rheology system and finite element models, the roles of the two most dominant time-dependent mechanisms (poroelasticity and viscoelasticity) that govern the dynamic loading behavior of mouse skin and tendon have been investigated. FE models were able to predict and quantify the contribution of each mechanism to the overall dynamic response and confirming the presence of these two distinct mechanisms in the mechanical response. Overall, these results provide novel insight into the viscoelastic and poroelastic properties of mouse skin and tendon and promote better understanding of the underlying origins of each mechanism.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFM; Finite element analysis; Poroelasticity; Skin dermis; Tendon; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29425716     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  11 in total

1.  A multiphasic model for determination of water and solute transport across the arterial wall: effects of elastic fiber defects.

Authors:  Young Guang; Austin J Cocciolone; Christie L Crandall; Benjamin B Johnston; Lori A Setton; Jessica E Wagenseil
Journal:  Arch Appl Mech       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  Aggrecan: Approaches to Study Biophysical and Biomechanical Properties.

Authors:  Hadi Tavakoli Nia; Christine Ortiz; Alan Grodzinsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  In situ AFM-based nanoscale rheology reveals regional non-uniformity in viscoporoelastic mechanical behavior of the murine periodontal ligament.

Authors:  Brianne K Connizzo; Gili R S Naveh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Evaluation of transverse poroelastic mechanics of tendon using osmotic loading and biphasic mixture finite element modeling.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; Ellen T Bloom; Andrea H Lee; Michael H Santare; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Nonuniformity in Periodontal Ligament: Mechanics and Matrix Composition.

Authors:  B K Connizzo; L Sun; N Lacin; A Gendelman; I Solomonov; I Sagi; A J Grodzinsky; G R S Naveh
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Assessment of the viscoelastic mechanical properties of the porcine optic nerve head using micromechanical testing and finite element modeling.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; A Thomas Read; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 10.633

7.  A method to analyze the influence of mechanical strain on dermal collagen morphologies.

Authors:  Maximilian Witte; Michael Rübhausen; Sören Jaspers; Horst Wenck; Frank Fischer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Structure-Function Relationships of Healthy and Osteoarthritic Human Tibial Cartilage: Experimental and Numerical Investigation.

Authors:  Mohammadhossein Ebrahimi; Mikael J Turunen; Mikko A Finnilä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Kröger; Simo Saarakkala; Rami K Korhonen; Petri Tanska
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Authors:  Ovijit Chaudhuri; Justin Cooper-White; Paul A Janmey; David J Mooney; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A biphasic multilayer computational model of human skin.

Authors:  David Sachs; Adam Wahlsten; Sebastian Kozerke; Gaetana Restivo; Edoardo Mazza
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.