Sayali S Deshpande-Joshi1, Shobha Rao2. 1. a School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University , Pune , India. 2. b Society for Initiatives in Nutrition and Development , Aundh, Pune , India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assessing risk of hypertension in relation to decadal changes in anthropometry among cohort of young rural Indian men. METHODS: Subjects (n = 140) were measured in 2005 and 2015 for blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), body fat (BF), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and additionally for visceral fat (VF) at follow-up. RESULTS: Decadal changes showed significant (p < 0.001) increase in mean anthropometric measures and in prevalence of overall obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) from 3.6% to 37.1%; adiposity (BF ≥25%) from 5.1% to 40.9%; and central obesity (WHR ≥0.9) from 0.7% to 24.3%. Prevalence of hypertension increased (20.7% to 27.1%) but was not statistically significant. VF correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with decadal changes (Δ) in BMI, BF, WC, and WHR, and the correlations were stronger (r = 0.90, 0.78, 0.84, and 0.56, respectively) for lean (baseline BMI < median) subjects than nonlean (baseline BMI ≥median) subjects (r = 0.68, 0.40, 0.61, and 0.43, respectively). Risk of hypertension was significant (odds ratio [OR] = 11.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-42.8) for subjects with higher ΔBMI (≥4.7 kg/m2) compared with those with lower ΔBMI (<4.7 kg/m2) among lean but was not significant among nonlean subjects. This was also true for change in other adiposity indicators, indicating greater vulnerability of lean subjects. Further, among lean subjects, ORs reduced considerably after adjusting for VF, whereas among nonlean subjects ORs continued to remain nonsignificant but showing independent significance for VF. CONCLUSIONS: For similar level of change in adiposity indicators, lean subjects were at greater risk of hypertension than nonlean subjects, probably due to higher VF deposition.
OBJECTIVE: Assessing risk of hypertension in relation to decadal changes in anthropometry among cohort of young rural Indian men. METHODS: Subjects (n = 140) were measured in 2005 and 2015 for blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), body fat (BF), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and additionally for visceral fat (VF) at follow-up. RESULTS:Decadal changes showed significant (p < 0.001) increase in mean anthropometric measures and in prevalence of overall obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) from 3.6% to 37.1%; adiposity (BF ≥25%) from 5.1% to 40.9%; and central obesity (WHR ≥0.9) from 0.7% to 24.3%. Prevalence of hypertension increased (20.7% to 27.1%) but was not statistically significant. VF correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with decadal changes (Δ) in BMI, BF, WC, and WHR, and the correlations were stronger (r = 0.90, 0.78, 0.84, and 0.56, respectively) for lean (baseline BMI < median) subjects than nonlean (baseline BMI ≥median) subjects (r = 0.68, 0.40, 0.61, and 0.43, respectively). Risk of hypertension was significant (odds ratio [OR] = 11.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-42.8) for subjects with higher ΔBMI (≥4.7 kg/m2) compared with those with lower ΔBMI (<4.7 kg/m2) among lean but was not significant among nonlean subjects. This was also true for change in other adiposity indicators, indicating greater vulnerability of lean subjects. Further, among lean subjects, ORs reduced considerably after adjusting for VF, whereas among nonlean subjects ORs continued to remain nonsignificant but showing independent significance for VF. CONCLUSIONS: For similar level of change in adiposity indicators, lean subjects were at greater risk of hypertension than nonlean subjects, probably due to higher VF deposition.