| Literature DB >> 29425219 |
Hamid Reza Oskorouchi1,2,3, Peng Nie1, Alfonso Sousa-Poza1,4.
Abstract
This study uses biomarker information from the 2013 National Nutrition Survey Afghanistan and satellite precipitation driven modeling results from the Global Flood Monitoring System to analyze how floods affect the probability of anemia in Afghan women of reproductive age (15-49). In addition to establishing a causal relation between the two by exploiting the quasi-random variation of floods in different districts and periods, the analysis demonstrates that floods have a significant positive effect on the probability of anemia through two possible transmission mechanisms. The first is a significant effect on inflammation, probably related to water borne diseases carried by unsafe drinking water, and the second is a significant negative effect on retinol concentrations. Because the effect of floods on anemia remains significant even after we control for anemia's most common causes, we argue that the condition may also be affected by elevated levels of psychological stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29425219 PMCID: PMC5806855 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Measures of flood, conflict and urbanization: Correlation analysis.
| Floodt−1 (pop) | Floodt−1 (den) | Floodt−2 (pop) | Floodt−2 (den) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Fatt−1 (pop) | 0.019 | -0.009 | – | – |
| (0.523) | (0.768) | |||
| Fatt−2 (pop) | – | – | 0.038 | -0.006 |
| (0.195) | (0.837) | |||
| Pop. Density | -0.025 | -0.023 | -0.037 | -0.029 |
| (0.400) | (0.425) | (0-214) | (0.327) | |
| Rural (dummy) | -0.135 | -0.140 | -0.086 | -0.121 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) |
Notes: Table reports Pearson correlation coefficients for all variables with the exception of the rural dummy for which tetrachoric correlations coefficients are shown. P-values in parenthesis are computed using a 95% confidence interval.
Descriptive statistics.
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Difference (p value) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Anemia | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.499 |
| Age | 30.36 | 7.97 | 30.29 | 7.87 | 0.417 |
| Woman is literate | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.451 |
| Woman is pregnant | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.755 |
| Interviewed after Ramadan | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.732 |
| Wealth index | 0.00 | 1.25 | -0.02 | 1.25 | 0.362 |
| Dependency ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 1.30 | 0.83 | 0.741 |
| Safe water | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.468 |
| Head is literate | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.478 |
| Head age | 45.12 | 14.51 | 44.94 | 14.67 | 0.393 |
| Head is married | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.91 | 0.28 | 0.477 |
| Flood: 1 month (mm) | 0.31 | 1.68 | 0.32 | 1.70 | 0.568 |
| Flood: 2 months (mm) | 1.68 | 4.38 | 1.63 | 4.28 | 0.399 |
| Flood: 1 month | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 0.576 |
| Flood: 2 months | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.652 |
| Iron deficiency ( | 0.30 | 0.46 | |||
| B12 low intake ( | 0.51 | 0.50 | |||
| Vit. A deficiency ( | 0.13 | 0.34 | |||
| Zinc deficiency ( | 0.21 | 0.41 | |||
| Inflammation ( | 0.04 | 0.21 | |||
| Inflammation ( | 0.007 | 0.08 | |||
| Number of districts | 53 | 53 | |||
| Number of observations | 1128 | 979 |
Notes: Column (5) is calculated using t-tests.
aDummy variables.
bComputed by a polychoric principal component analysis applied to a set of assets, as well as the availability of electricity and safe water.
cThe proportion of economically inactive members in the household (individuals aged 0-14, and over 65) divided by the number of active members (15–64).
dThe district level daily average count of accumulated land surface water in millimeters above the flood threshold measured at one and two months before the interview date.
Fig 1Daily average floods in millimetres (April-October 2013).
Drawn by the authors using GFMS data. Resolution 0.125° longitude/latitude.
Effect of floods on anemia: OLS estimates.
| Anemia | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Flood | 0.039 | 0.024 | ||
| (0.006) | (0.009) | |||
| Flood | 0.054 | 0.033 | ||
| (0.009) | (0.013) | |||
| Iron deficiency | 0.219 | 0.219 | ||
| (0.037) | (0.037) | |||
| Inflammation ( | 0.129 | 0.129 | ||
| (0.099) | (0.099) | |||
| Vit. A deficiency | 0.202 | 0.202 | ||
| (0.062) | (0.062) | |||
| Zinc deficiency | 0.009 | 0.009 | ||
| (0.070) | (0.070) | |||
| Vit. B12 low intake | 0.043 | 0.043 | ||
| (0.048) | (0.048) | |||
| Province fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Ethnicity fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 1,128 | 1,128 | 979 | 979 |
| 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.139 | 0.139 | |
| Adjusted | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.096 | 0.096 |
| Residual std. error | 9.384 | 9.384 | 9.007 | 9.007 |
| 2.356 | 2.355 | 3.202 | 3.201 | |
Notes: The dependent variable is equal to 1 if the respondent’s hemoglobin concentration is less than 12mg/dL (< 11mg/dL for pregnant women) and 0 otherwise. The regressions control for woman’s age, literacy, and current pregnancy status; household location type (urban vs. rural), wealth index, dependency ratio, and ethnolinguistic affiliation; and age, sex, literacy, and marital status of household head, while also including provincial dummies and provincial aid. All models are estimated using sampling survey weights, and the flood variable in all specifications is adjusted for district population density. Robust standard errors (in parenthesis) are clustered at the district level.
* p < 0.1,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01.
Effect of floods on serum ferritin and serum retinol: OLS estimates.
| Ferritin ( | Retinol ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Floodt−1 | -0.544 | -2.209 | ||
| (2.934) | (0.383) | |||
| Floodt−2 | -0.735 | -3.208 | ||
| (4.283) | (0.543) | |||
| Province fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Ethnicity fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 979 | 979 | 979 | 979 |
| 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.099 | 0.099 | |
| Adjusted | 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.057 | 0.058 |
| Residual std. error | 577.950 | 577.951 | 240.588 | 240.581 |
| 2.271 | 2.270 | 2.386 | 2.388 | |
Notes: In regressions 1 and 2, the dependent variable is level of serum ferritin in μg/dL, whereas in regressions 3 and 4, it is serum retinol in μg/dL. These regressions control for woman’s age, literacy, and current pregnancy status; household location type (urban vs. rural), wealth index, dependency ratio, ethnolinguistic affiliation; and age, sex, literacy, and marital status of household head, while also including provincial dummies and provincial aid. Only for regressions 1 and 2 is inflammation status (CRP > 1 mg/dL) used as a regressor. All models are estimated using sampling survey weights, and the flood variable in all specifications is adjusted for district population density. Robust standard errors (in parenthesis) are clustered at the district level.
* p < 0.1,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01.
Effect of floods on inflammation and availability of safe water: OLS estimates.
| Inflammation | Safe water | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Floodt−1 | 0.015 | -0.124 | ||
| (0.005) | 0.035 | |||
| Floodt−2 | 0.023 | -0.179 | ||
| (0.006) | (0.050) | |||
| Province fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Ethnicity fixed effects | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 979 | 979 | 889 | 889 |
| 0.063 | 0.064 | 0.289 | 0.289 | |
| Adjusted | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.256 | 0.256 |
| Residual std. error | 4.352 | 4.351 | 7.550 | 7.550 |
| 1.511 | 1.511 | 8.624 | 8.625 | |
Notes:In regressions 1 and 2, the dependent variable is inflammation status (CRP > 1 mg/dL), whereas in regressions 3 and 4, it is access to safe water (1 if yes, 0 otherwise). These regressions control for woman’s age; household location type (urban vs. rural), wealth index, dependency ratio, and ethnolinguistic affiliation; and age, sex, literacy, and marital status of household head, while also including provincial dummies and provincial aid. Only specifications 1 and 2 also control for woman’s current pregnancy status. All models are estimated using sampling survey weights, and the flood variable in all specifications is adjusted for district population density. Robust standard errors (in parenthesis) are clustered at the district level.
* p < 0.1,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01.