Literature DB >> 29425081

Impacts of Federally Funded State Obesity Programs on Adult Obesity Prevalence in the United States, 1998-2010.

Keumseok Koh1,2, Sue C Grady1, Igor Vojnovic1, Joe T Darden1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: From 2000 to 2010, the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity (DNPAO) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 37 state health departments to address the obesity epidemic in their states through various interventions. The objective of this study was to investigate the overall impacts of CDC-DNPAO statewide intervention programs on adult obesity prevalence in the United States.
METHODS: We used a set of an individual-level, interrupted time-series regression and a quasi-experimental analysis to evaluate the overall effect of CDC-DNPAO intervention programs before (1998-1999) and after (2010) their implementation by using data from CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
RESULTS: States that implemented the CDC-DNPAO program had a 2.4% to 3.8% reduction in the odds of obesity during 2000-2010 compared with states without the program. The effect of the CDC-DNPAO program varied by length of program implementation. A quasi-experimental analysis found that states with longer program implementation did not necessarily have lower odds of obesity than states with shorter program implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: Statewide obesity interventions can contribute to reduced odds of obesity in the United States. Future research should evaluate the CDC-DNPAO programs in relation to their goals, objectives, and other environmental obesity risk factors to inform future interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; obesity; quasi-experimental analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29425081      PMCID: PMC5871133          DOI: 10.1177/0033354917751128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  How have state policies to expand dependent coverage affected the health insurance status of young adults?

Authors:  Alan C Monheit; Joel C Cantor; Derek DeLia; Dina Belloff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?

Authors:  M Petticrew; S Cummins; C Ferrell; A Findlay; C Higgins; C Hoy; A Kearns; L Sparks
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  The value of partnerships in state obesity prevention and control programs.

Authors:  James Hersey; Bridget Kelly; Amy Roussel; LaShawn Curtis; Joseph Horne; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Sarah Kuester; Rosanne Farris
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2011-03-22

Review 4.  An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.

Authors:  K R McLeroy; D Bibeau; A Steckler; K Glanz
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

5.  Effects of healthcare reforms on coverage, access, and disparities: quasi-experimental analysis of evidence from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Aakanksha H Pande; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Alan M Zaslavsky; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The Nutrition and Physical Activity Program to Prevent Obesity and Other Chronic Diseases: monitoring progress in funded states.

Authors:  Sue Lin Yee; Pam Williams-Piehota; Asta Sorensen; Amy Roussel; James Hersey; Robin Hamre
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Cyrus Cooper; David Gunnell; Sally Haw; Kenny Lawson; Sally Macintyre; David Ogilvie; Mark Petticrew; Barney Reeves; Matt Sutton; Simon Thompson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.710

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.