Literature DB >> 29424676

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study of condoliase in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Yukihiro Matsuyama1, Kazuhiro Chiba2, Hisashi Iwata3, Takayuki Seo4, Yoshiaki Toyama2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Chemonucleolysis with condoliase has the potential to be a new, less invasive therapeutic option for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The aim of the present study was to determine the most suitable therapeutic dose of condoliase. METHODS Patients between 20 and 70 years of age with unilateral leg pain, positive findings on the straight leg raise test, and LDH were recruited. All eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive condoliase (1.25, 2.5, or 5 U) or placebo. The primary end point was a change in the worst leg pain from preadministration (baseline) to week 13. The secondary end points were changes from baseline in the following items: worst back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36, and neurological examination. For pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses, plasma condoliase concentrations and serum keratan sulfate concentrations were measured. The safety end points were adverse events (AEs) and radiographic and MRI parameters. Data on leg pain, back pain, abnormal neurological findings, and imaging parameters were collected until week 52. RESULTS A total of 194 patients received an injection of condoliase or placebo. The mean change in worst leg pain from baseline to week 13 was -31.7 mm (placebo), -46.7 mm (1.25 U), -41.1 mm (2.5 U), and -47.6 mm (5 U). The differences were significant at week 13 in the 1.25-U group (-14.9 mm; 95% CI -28.4 to -1.4 mm; p = 0.03) and 5-U group (-15.9 mm; 95% CI -29.0 to -2.7 mm; p = 0.01) compared with the placebo group. The dose-response improvement in the worst leg pain at week 13 was not significant (p = 0.14). The decrease in the worst leg pain in all 3 condoliase groups was observed from week 1 through week 52. Regarding the other end points, the worst back pain and results of the straight leg raise test, ODI, and SF-36 showed a tendency for sustained improvement in each of the condoliase groups until week 52. In all patients at all time points, plasma condoliase concentrations were below the detectable limit (< 100 μU/ml). Serum keratan sulfate concentrations significantly increased from baseline to 6 hours and 6 weeks after administration in all 3 condoliase groups. No patient died or developed anaphylaxis or neurological sequelae. Five serious AEs occurred in 5 patients (3 patients in the condoliase groups and 2 patients in the placebo group), resolved, and were considered unrelated to the investigational drug. Severe AEs occurred in 10 patients in the condoliase groups and resolved or improved. In the condoliase groups, back pain was the most frequent AE. Modic type 1 change and decrease in disc height were frequent imaging findings. Dose-response relationships were observed for the incidence of adverse drug reactions and decrease in disc height. CONCLUSIONS Condoliase significantly improved clinical symptoms in patients with LDH and was well tolerated. While all 3 doses had similar efficacy, the incidence of adverse drug reactions and decrease in disc height were dose dependent, thereby suggesting that 1.25 U would be the recommended clinical dose of condoliase. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00634946 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADR = adverse drug reaction; AE = adverse event; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AUClast = area under the serum concentration–time curve from baseline to last sampling time; Cmax = maximum serum concentration; IgE = immunoglobulin E; LDH = lumbar disc herniation; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; SLR = straight leg raise; Tmax = time to reach maximum serum concentration; VAS = visual analog scale; chemonucleolysis; condoliase; dose-finding study; leg pain; less invasive; lumbar disc herniation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29424676     DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  12 in total

1.  Intradiscal Injection with Condoliase (Chondroitin Sulfate ABC Endolyase) for Painful Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Takashi Hirai; Takuya Takahashi; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Takayuki Motoyoshi; Yu Matsukura; Masato Yuasa; Hiroyuki Inose; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 2.  Cell-based strategies for IVD repair: clinical progress and translational obstacles.

Authors:  Abbie L A Binch; Joan C Fitzgerald; Emily A Growney; Frank Barry
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 32.286

3.  Chemonucleolysis with Chondroitin Sulfate ABC Endolyase for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation: Exploration of Prognostic Factors for Good or Poor Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Ishibashi; Muneyoshi Fujita; Yuichi Takano; Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Short-Term Outcome and Predictors of Therapeutic Effects of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Hideaki Nakajima; Arisa Kubota; Yasuhisa Maezawa; Shuji Watanabe; Kazuya Honjoh; Hironori Ohmori; Akihiko Matsumine
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Sciatica-Related Spinal Imbalance in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients: Radiological Characteristics and Recovery Following Endoscopic Discectomy.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Chao Li; Lianlei Wang; Lei Qi; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Two Cases of Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation Successfully Treated with Intradiscal Condoliase Injection.

Authors:  Toru Funayama; Kentaro Mataki; Kohei Murakami; Yuki Mataki; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kousei Miura; Yosuke Shibao; Fumihiko Eto; Mamoru Kono; Tetsuya Abe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Masao Koda; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-09-23

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Condoliase Disc Administration as a New Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Takeshi Sainoh; Atsushi Kojima; Masatsune Yamagata; Tatsuo Morinaga; Chikato Mannoji; Hiromi Ataka; Masaomi Yamashita; Hiroshi Takahashi; Junya Saito; Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yawara Eguchi; Kei Kato; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Yasuhiro Shiga; Masaki Norimoto; Tomotaka Umimura; Yuki Shiko; Yohei Kawasaki; Yasuchika Aoki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

8.  A Case of Postoperative Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Conservatively Treated with Novel Intradiscal Condoliase Injection.

Authors:  Toru Funayama; Yusuke Setojima; Yosuke Shibao; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kousei Miura; Fumihiko Eto; Kosuke Sato; Mamoru Kono; Tomoyuki Asada; Hiroshi Takahashi; Masaki Tatsumura; Masao Koda; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-02-15

9.  Intradiscal injection for the management of low back pain.

Authors:  Fu Zhang; Songjuan Wang; Baoliang Li; Wei Tian; Zhiyu Zhou; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-12-22

10.  The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 2021: 4. Treatment.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.