Literature DB >> 29423862

Establishing in vitro-in vivo correlation for antibody drug conjugate efficacy: a PK/PD modeling approach.

Dhaval K Shah1,2, Frank Loganzo3, Nahor Haddish-Berhane4, Sylvia Musto3, Hallie S Wald3, Frank Barletta4, Judy Lucas3, Tracey Clark4, Steve Hansel4, Alison Betts5,6.   

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript was to establish in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) between the in vitro efficacy and in vivo efficacy of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), using a PK/PD modeling approach. Nineteen different ADCs were used to develop IVIVC. In vitro efficacy of ADCs was evaluated using a kinetic cell cytotoxicity assay. The cytotoxicity data obtained from in vitro studies was characterized using a novel mathematical model, parameter estimates from which were used to derive an in vitro efficacy matrix for each ADC, termed as 'in vitro tumor static concentration' (TSCin vitro). TSCin vitro is a theoretical concentration at continuous exposure of which the number of cells will neither increase nor decrease, compared to the initial cell number in the experiment. The in vivo efficacy of ADCs was evaluated using tumor growth inhibition (TGI) studies performed on human tumor xenograft bearing mice. The TGI data obtained from in vivo studies was characterized using a PK/PD model, parameter estimates from which were used to derive an in vivo efficacy matrix for each ADC, termed as 'in vivo tumor static concentration' (TSCin vivo). TSCin vivo is a theoretical concentration if one were to maintain in the plasma of a tumor bearing mouse, the tumor volume will neither increase nor decrease compared to the initial tumor volume. Comparison of the TSCin vitro and TSCin vivo values from 19 ADCs provided a linear and positive IVIVC. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for TSCin vitro and TSCin vivo was found to be 0.82. On average TSCin vivo was found to be ~ 27 times higher than TSCin vitro. The reasonable IVIVC for ADCs suggests that in vitro efficacy data was correctly able to differentiate ADCs for their in vivo efficacy. Thus, IVIVC can be used as a tool to triage ADC molecules in the discovery stage, thereby preventing unnecessary scaling-up of ADCs and waste of time and resources. An ability to predict the concentration of ADC that is efficacious in vivo using the in vitro data can also help in optimizing the experimental design of preclinical efficacy studies. As such, the novel PK/PD modeling method presented here to establish IVIVC for ADCs holds promise, and should be evaluated further using diverse set of cell lines and anticancer agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody drug conjugate; Efficacy; In vitro–in vivo correlation; Oncology; PK/PD modeling; TSC; Tumor static concentration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29423862     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-018-9577-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  10 in total

1.  High in vitro-in vivo correlation of drug response using sponge-gel-supported three-dimensional histoculture and the MTT end point.

Authors:  T Furukawa; T Kubota; M Watanabe; T Takahara; H Yamaguchi; T Takeuchi; S Kase; S Kodaira; K Ishibiki; M Kitajima
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-05-28       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice.

Authors:  M M Tomayko; C P Reynolds
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro.

Authors:  Evelyn D Lobo; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models.

Authors:  Theodora Voskoglou-Nomikos; Joseph L Pater; Lesley Seymour
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Comparison of two pharmacodynamic transduction models for the analysis of tumor therapeutic responses in model systems.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Donald E Mager; Robert M Straubinger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Bench to bedside translation of antibody drug conjugates using a multiscale mechanistic PK/PD model: a case study with brentuximab-vedotin.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Alison Betts
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents.

Authors:  Monica Simeoni; Paolo Magni; Cristiano Cammia; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Valter Croci; Enrico Pesenti; Massimiliano Germani; Italo Poggesi; Maurizio Rocchetti
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Clonogenic assay with established human tumour xenografts: correlation of in vitro to in vivo activity as a basis for anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  H H Fiebig; A Maier; A M Burger
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  On translation of antibody drug conjugates efficacy from mouse experimental tumors to the clinic: a PK/PD approach.

Authors:  Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Dhaval K Shah; Dangshe Ma; Mauricio Leal; Hans-Peter Gerber; Puja Sapra; Hugh A Barton; Alison M Betts
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Relationships between drug activity in NCI preclinical in vitro and in vivo models and early clinical trials.

Authors:  J I Johnson; S Decker; D Zaharevitz; L V Rubinstein; J M Venditti; S Schepartz; S Kalyandrug; M Christian; S Arbuck; M Hollingshead; E A Sausville
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  A "Dual" Cell-Level Systems PK-PD Model to Characterize the Bystander Effect of ADC.

Authors:  Aman P Singh; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  An Agent-Based Systems Pharmacology Model of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Kadcyla to Predict Efficacy of Different Dosing Regimens.

Authors:  Bruna Menezes; Cornelius Cilliers; Timothy Wessler; Greg M Thurber; Jennifer J Linderman
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Modeling long-term tumor growth and kill after combinations of radiation and radiosensitizing agents.

Authors:  Tim Cardilin; Joachim Almquist; Mats Jirstrand; Astrid Zimmermann; Floriane Lignet; Samer El Bawab; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  An In Vitro-In Vivo Simulation Approach for the Prediction of Bioequivalence.

Authors:  Marilena Vlachou; Vangelis Karalis
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Target-responsive subcellular catabolism analysis for early-stage antibody-drug conjugates screening and assessment.

Authors:  Hua Sang; Jiali Liu; Fang Zhou; Xiaofang Zhang; Jingwei Zhang; Yazhong Liu; Guangji Wang; Hui Ye
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 6.  Development of and insights from systems pharmacology models of antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Inez Lam; Venkatesh Pilla Reddy; Kathryn Ball; Rosalinda H Arends; Feilim Mac Gabhann
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-03

Review 7.  The Combination of Cell Cultured Technology and In Silico Model to Inform the Drug Development.

Authors:  Zhengying Zhou; Jinwei Zhu; Muhan Jiang; Lan Sang; Kun Hao; Hua He
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.