Eamonn Byrne1,2, Gerard Bury3. 1. National Ambulance Service, Mallow, Cork, Ireland. Eamonn.byrne@hse.ie. 2. University College Dublin, Centre for Emegency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Eamonn.byrne@hse.ie. 3. University College Dublin, Centre for Emegency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incident reporting is vital to identifying pre-hospital medication safety issues because literature suggests that the majority of errors pre-hospital are self-identified. In 2016, the National Ambulance Service (NAS) reported 11 medication errors to the national body with responsibility for risk management and insurance cover. The Health Information and Quality Authority in 2014 stated that reporting of clinical incidents, of which medication errors are a subset, was not felt to be representative of the actual events occurring. Even though reporting systems are in place, the levels appear to be well below what might be expected. Little data is available to explain this apparent discrepancy. AIMS: To identify, investigate and document the barriers to medication error reporting within the NAS. METHODS: An independent moderator led four focus groups in March of 2016. A convenience sample of 18 frontline Paramedics and Advanced Paramedics from Cork City and County discussed medication errors and the medication error reporting process. The sessions were recorded and anonymised, and the data was analysed using a process of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Practitioners understood the value of reporting errors. Barriers to reporting included fear of consequences and ridicule, procedural ambiguity, lack of feedback and a perceived lack of both consistency and confidentiality. The perceived consequences for making an error included professional, financial, litigious and psychological. CONCLUSION: Staff appeared willing to admit errors in a psychologically safe environment. Barriers to reporting are in line with international evidence. Time constraints prevented achievement of thematic saturation. Further study is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Incident reporting is vital to identifying pre-hospital medication safety issues because literature suggests that the majority of errors pre-hospital are self-identified. In 2016, the National Ambulance Service (NAS) reported 11 medication errors to the national body with responsibility for risk management and insurance cover. The Health Information and Quality Authority in 2014 stated that reporting of clinical incidents, of which medication errors are a subset, was not felt to be representative of the actual events occurring. Even though reporting systems are in place, the levels appear to be well below what might be expected. Little data is available to explain this apparent discrepancy. AIMS: To identify, investigate and document the barriers to medication error reporting within the NAS. METHODS: An independent moderator led four focus groups in March of 2016. A convenience sample of 18 frontline Paramedics and Advanced Paramedics from Cork City and County discussed medication errors and the medication error reporting process. The sessions were recorded and anonymised, and the data was analysed using a process of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Practitioners understood the value of reporting errors. Barriers to reporting included fear of consequences and ridicule, procedural ambiguity, lack of feedback and a perceived lack of both consistency and confidentiality. The perceived consequences for making an error included professional, financial, litigious and psychological. CONCLUSION: Staff appeared willing to admit errors in a psychologically safe environment. Barriers to reporting are in line with international evidence. Time constraints prevented achievement of thematic saturation. Further study is warranted.
Authors: Gary M Vilke; Stephen V Tornabene; Barbara Stepanski; Holly E Shipp; Leslie Upledger Ray; Marcelyn A Metz; Dori Vroman; Marilyn Anderson; Patricia A Murrin; Daniel P Davis; Jim Harley Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2007 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Cherri Hobgood; Josie Barnes Bowen; Jane H Brice; Barbara Overby; Joshua H Tamayo-Sarver Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2006 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.077