Literature DB >> 29423756

Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory.

Carrie R Houts1, Robert Morlock2, Steven I Blum3, Michael C Edwards4, R J Wirth5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Measurement development in hard-to-reach populations can pose methodological challenges. Item response theory (IRT) is a useful statistical tool, but often requires large samples. We describe the use of longitudinal IRT models as a pragmatic approach to instrument development when large samples are not feasible.
METHODS: The statistical foundations and practical benefits of longitudinal IRT models are briefly described. Results from a simulation study are reported to demonstrate the model's ability to recover the generating measurement structure and parameters using a range of sample sizes, number of items, and number of time points. An example using early-phase clinical trial data in a rare condition demonstrates these methods in practice.
RESULTS: Simulation study results demonstrate that the longitudinal IRT model's ability to recover the generating parameters rests largely on the interaction between sample size and the number of time points. Overall, the model performs well even in small samples provided a sufficient number of time points are available. The clinical trial data example demonstrates that by using conditional, longitudinal IRT models researchers can obtain stable estimates of psychometric characteristics from samples typically considered too small for rigorous psychometric modeling.
CONCLUSION: Capitalizing on repeated measurements, it is possible to estimate psychometric characteristics for an assessment even when sample size is small. This allows researchers to optimize study designs and have increased confidence in subsequent comparisons using scores obtained from such models. While there are limitations and caveats to consider when using these models, longitudinal IRT modeling may be especially beneficial when developing measures for rare conditions and diseases in difficult-to-reach populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Item response theory; Longitudinal data; Rare diseases; Scale development; Small sample statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29423756     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1801-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  Item response models for longitudinal quality of life data in clinical trials.

Authors:  J A Douglas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  The pruritus of cholestasis.

Authors:  E A Jones; N V Bergasa
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change.

Authors:  Frans J Oort
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

Review 5.  A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

Authors:  Carrie R Houts; Michael C Edwards; R J Wirth; Linda S Deal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Pruritus in cholestasis: facts and fiction.

Authors:  Ulrich Beuers; Andreas E Kremer; Ruth Bolier; Ronald P J Oude Elferink
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  Primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jayant A Talwalkar; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effect of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor GSK2330672 on pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase 2a study.

Authors:  Vinod S Hegade; Stuart F W Kendrick; Robert L Dobbins; Sam R Miller; Douglas Thompson; Duncan Richards; James Storey; George E Dukes; Margaret Corrigan; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; Ulrich Beuers; Gideon M Hirschfield; David E Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Development of the Contact Lens User Experience: CLUE Scales.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards; Michael Henderson; Terri Henderson; Giovanna Olivares; Carrie R Houts
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  3 in total

1.  Introduction to special section: test construction.

Authors:  Muirne C S Paap; Jan R Böhnke; Carolyn E Schwartz; Frans J Oort
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures for patients who experience itch associated with primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Mona L Martin; Larissa Stassek; Steven I Blum; Ashish V Joshi; David Jones
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-01-15

3.  Psychometric evaluation of the Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth (PAI-CY) 0-2 years with visual impairment.

Authors:  Ellen B M Elsman; Ruth M A van Nispen; Gerardus H M B van Rens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.