Anne E Gill1,2, Nicholas Gallagher3, Barbara O McElhanon4,5, Amy R Painter4, Benjamin D Gold4,6, C Matthew Hawkins3,7. 1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. anne.gill@emory.edu. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Suite D112, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. anne.gill@emory.edu. 3. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Aerodigestive Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, Atlanta, GA, USA. 6. GI Care for Kids, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Suite D112, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in pediatric patients offer less external catheter bulk and decreased propensity for dislodgement as children become more mobile. While small cohort studies have evaluated de novo placement of coaxial, adjustable-length, percutaneous gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes in children, placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in pediatric patients has not been analyzed. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous, retrograde placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in infants and children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, all de novo low-profile GJ tube placements in patients were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and May 2017. Technical parameters of fluoroscopy time, tube size, T-fasteners and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four de novo low-profile GJ tubes were placed in 34 patients (median age: 9.4 months, range: 2 months-11.8 years; median pre-procedural weight: 7.5 kg, range: 2.9-31.6 kg). Twenty-one 14-Fr and 13 16-Fr GJ tubes were placed with technical success rate of 100%. Average weight gain 3 months' post procedure was 1.1 kg (range: 0.3-4.8 kg) and average weight percentile for age increase was 9.6% (range: -48.9% to 53.5%). One major complication occurred following balloon inflation within the tract causing pain requiring urgent replacement of the GJ tube. Minor complications occurred in 11 patients (32%): accidental dislodgement (n=9), skin irritation (n=4), tube dysfunction (n=2), leakage (n=2) and tube migration into the esophagus (n=1). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, antegrade, image-guided placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes is technically feasible, safe and clinically efficacious in appropriately selected pediatric patients.
BACKGROUND: De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in pediatric patients offer less external catheter bulk and decreased propensity for dislodgement as children become more mobile. While small cohort studies have evaluated de novo placement of coaxial, adjustable-length, percutaneous gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes in children, placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in pediatric patients has not been analyzed. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous, retrograde placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in infants and children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, all de novo low-profile GJ tube placements in patients were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and May 2017. Technical parameters of fluoroscopy time, tube size, T-fasteners and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and complications, were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four de novo low-profile GJ tubes were placed in 34 patients (median age: 9.4 months, range: 2 months-11.8 years; median pre-procedural weight: 7.5 kg, range: 2.9-31.6 kg). Twenty-one 14-Fr and 13 16-Fr GJ tubes were placed with technical success rate of 100%. Average weight gain 3 months' post procedure was 1.1 kg (range: 0.3-4.8 kg) and average weight percentile for age increase was 9.6% (range: -48.9% to 53.5%). One major complication occurred following balloon inflation within the tract causing pain requiring urgent replacement of the GJ tube. Minor complications occurred in 11 patients (32%): accidental dislodgement (n=9), skin irritation (n=4), tube dysfunction (n=2), leakage (n=2) and tube migration into the esophagus (n=1). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, antegrade, image-guided placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes is technically feasible, safe and clinically efficacious in appropriately selected pediatric patients.
Authors: John F Cardella; Sanjoy Kundu; Donald L Miller; Steven F Millward; David Sacks Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Maxim Itkin; Mark H DeLegge; John C Fang; Stephen A McClave; Sanjoy Kundu; Bertrand Janne d'Othee; Gloria M Martinez-Salazar; David Sacks; Timothy L Swan; Richard B Towbin; T Gregory Walker; Joan C Wojak; Darryl A Zuckerman; John F Cardella Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Michael H Livingston; Anna C Shawyer; Peter L Rosenbaum; Sarah A Jones; J Mark Walton Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Paul W Wales; Ivan R Diamond; Sanjeev Dutta; Sergio Muraca; Peter Chait; Bairbre Connolly; Jacob C Langer Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.545