Melissa E Dichter1,2, Anneliese E Sorrentino3, Terri N Haywood3, Scarlett L Bellamy4, Elina Medvedeva3, Christopher B Roberts3, Katherine M Iverson5,6. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Melissa.Dichter@va.gov. 2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Melissa.Dichter@va.gov. 3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Women's Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) can have adverse health impacts and has been associated with elevated rates of healthcare service utilization. Healthcare encounters present opportunities to identify IPV-related concerns and connect patients with services. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) conducts IPV screening within an integrated healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare service utilization in the 6 months following IPV screening between those screening positive and negative for past-year IPV (IPV+, IPV-) and to examine the timing and types of healthcare services accessed among women screening IPV+. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 8888 female VHA patients across 13 VHA facilities who were screened for past-year IPV between April 2014 and April 2016. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, marital status, veteran status), IPV screening response, and healthcare encounters (based on visit identification codes). KEY RESULTS: In the 6 months following routine screening for past-year IPV, patients screening IPV+ were more likely to utilize outpatient care (aOR = 1.85 [CI 1.26, 2.70]), including primary care or psychosocial care, and to have an inpatient stay (aOR = 2.09 [CI 1.23, 3.57]), compared with patients screening IPV-. Among those with any utilization, frequency of outpatient encounters within the 6-month period following screening was higher among those screening IPV+ compared with those screening IPV-. The majority of patients screening positive for past-year IPV returned for an outpatient visit within a brief time frame following the screening visit (> 70% within 14 days, >95% within 6 months). More than one in four patients screening IPV+ had an emergency department visit within the 6 months following screening. CONCLUSIONS: Women who screen positive for past-year IPV have high rates of return to outpatient visits following screening, presenting opportunities for follow-up support. Higher rates of emergency department utilization and inpatient stays among women screening IPV+ may indicate adverse health outcomes related to IPV experience.
BACKGROUND: Experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) can have adverse health impacts and has been associated with elevated rates of healthcare service utilization. Healthcare encounters present opportunities to identify IPV-related concerns and connect patients with services. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) conducts IPV screening within an integrated healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to compare service utilization in the 6 months following IPV screening between those screening positive and negative for past-year IPV (IPV+, IPV-) and to examine the timing and types of healthcare services accessed among women screening IPV+. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 8888 female VHA patients across 13 VHA facilities who were screened for past-year IPV between April 2014 and April 2016. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, marital status, veteran status), IPV screening response, and healthcare encounters (based on visit identification codes). KEY RESULTS: In the 6 months following routine screening for past-year IPV, patients screening IPV+ were more likely to utilize outpatient care (aOR = 1.85 [CI 1.26, 2.70]), including primary care or psychosocial care, and to have an inpatient stay (aOR = 2.09 [CI 1.23, 3.57]), compared with patients screening IPV-. Among those with any utilization, frequency of outpatient encounters within the 6-month period following screening was higher among those screening IPV+ compared with those screening IPV-. The majority of patients screening positive for past-year IPV returned for an outpatient visit within a brief time frame following the screening visit (> 70% within 14 days, >95% within 6 months). More than one in four patients screening IPV+ had an emergency department visit within the 6 months following screening. CONCLUSIONS:Women who screen positive for past-year IPV have high rates of return to outpatient visits following screening, presenting opportunities for follow-up support. Higher rates of emergency department utilization and inpatient stays among women screening IPV+ may indicate adverse health outcomes related to IPV experience.
Entities:
Keywords:
Veterans Health Administration; intimate partner violence; service utilization
Authors: Melissa E Dichter; Terri N Haywood; Anneliese E Butler; Scarlett L Bellamy; Katherine M Iverson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Frederick P Rivara; Melissa L Anderson; Paul Fishman; Amy E Bonomi; Robert J Reid; David Carrell; Robert S Thompson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Katherine M Iverson; Kristin Huang; Stephanie Y Wells; Jason D Wright; Megan R Gerber; Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Melissa E Dichter; Anneliese Sorrentino; Scarlett Bellamy; Elina Medvedeva; Christopher B Roberts; Katherine M Iverson Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Katherine M Iverson; Omonyêlé Adjognon; Alessandra R Grillo; Melissa E Dichter; Cassidy A Gutner; Alison B Hamilton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Megan R Gerber Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Melissa E Dichter; Shannon N Ogden; Anaïs Tuepker; Katherine M Iverson; Gala True Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Katherine M Iverson; Melissa E Dichter; Kelly Stolzmann; Omonyêlé L Adjognon; Robert A Lew; LeAnn E Bruce; Megan R Gerber; Galina A Portnoy; Christopher J Miller Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Sara B Danitz; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Alessandra R Grillo; Melissa E Dichter; Mary Driscoll; Megan R Gerber; Kristin Gregor; Alison B Hamilton; Katherine M Iverson Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Rachel Kishton; Laura Sinko; Robin Ortiz; Md Nazmul Islam; Annika Fredrickson; Natalie E Sheils; John Buresh; Peter F Cronholm; Meredith Matone Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec