| Literature DB >> 29423391 |
Seokyung Park1, Mi-Hye Woo1, Hyun Jung Lim2, Suk Chon3, Jeong-Taek Woo3.
Abstract
We reported the cases in order to evaluate the effects of individualized nutrition interventions for enhancing self-management abilities of prediabetic subjects. We conducted four nutrition interventions for weight control in two subjects with high-risk of type 2 diabetes. The first subject was a 53-year-old housewife, and the second subject was a 46-year-old male office worker. The subjects visited the medical center 4 times during the study period, and the lifestyle interventions were advised by a clinical team comprised physicians, clinical dietitians, and nurses. In particular, nutrition intervention to achieve weight loss focused on enhancing motivation and problem-solving skills to improve self-management ability. As a result, both subjects achieved weight loss by the time of their last visits. These two case studies, which differed in terms of sex, occupation, and dietary habits showed the importance of individualized nutrition intervention and forming an intimate relationship based on trust centered on prediabetic subjects. In conclusion, systematic collaboration within the clinical team is necessary, and social infrastructure should be prepared to fully realize the benefits of a systematic intervention program.Entities:
Keywords: Lifestyle; Nutritional management; Overweight; Prediabetes; Weight loss
Year: 2018 PMID: 29423391 PMCID: PMC5796925 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2018.7.1.69
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Nutr Res ISSN: 2287-3732
Figure 1Nutrition intervention protocol.
*Nutrition intervention was conducted according to the protocol, but the contents of nutrition education varied by the individual's dietary habit.
Clinical characteristics of the subject in each case at baseline
| Variables | Case 1 | Case 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General characteristics | |||
| Sex | Female | Male | |
| Age, yr | 53 | 46 | |
| Anthropometric indexes | |||
| Height, cm | 163.7 | 181.7 | |
| Weight, kg | 63.5 | 87.1 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.7 | 26.4 | |
| Biochemical indexes | |||
| HbA1c, % | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 165 | 182 | |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 101 | 203 | |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 88 | 114 | |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 62 | 42 | |
| Health-related behavior | |||
| Smoking | No | No | |
| Alcohol consumption | No | Yes | |
| Regular exercise | No | No | |
| Employed | No | Yes | |
BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.
Clinical characteristics of the subject in case 1 after nutrition counseling
| Case 1 | Baseline (0 wk) | 4 wk | 12 wk | 24 wk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight, kg | 63.5 | 59.5 | 57.7 | 57 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.7 | 22.2 | 21.5 | 21.3 | |
| HbA1c, % | 6.1 | - | - | 6.2 | |
| Nutrients intake | |||||
| Energy, kcal | 1,470 | 1,132 | 1,348 | 1,724 | |
| Carbohydrate, g | 221 | 196 | 191 | 231 | |
| Protein, g | 61 | 53 | 55 | 69 | |
| Fat, g | 38 | 19 | 46 | 64 | |
| Cholesterol, mg | 249 | 24 | 266 | 443 | |
| Fiber, g | 28 | 29 | 46 | 24 | |
| C:P:F, % | 60:17:23 | 69:12:19 | 57:27:16 | 54:30:16 | |
BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; C:P:F, carbohydrate:protein:fat ratio.
Clinical characteristics of the subject in case 2 after nutrition counseling
| Case 2 | Baseline (0 wk) | 4 wk | 12 wk | 24 wk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight, kg | 87.1 | 85 | 82.9 | 84.9 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.4 | 25.7 | 25.1 | 25.7 | |
| HbA1c, % | 5.6 | - | - | 5.8 | |
| Nutrients intake | |||||
| Energy, kcal | 1,427 | 1,407 | 1,694 | 2,107 | |
| Carbohydrate, g | 218 | 182 | 229 | 214 | |
| Protein, g | 47 | 57 | 50 | 86 | |
| Fat, g | 37 | 41 | 62 | 98 | |
| Cholesterol, mg | 384 | 183 | 192 | 233 | |
| Fiber, g | 13 | 16 | 16 | 17 | |
| C:P:F, % | 61:13:26 | 52:16:32 | 54:12:34 | 41:16:43 | |
BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; C:P:F, carbohydrate:protein:fat ratio.