Literature DB >> 29422203

Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits.

Jason Gardosi1, Andre Francis2, Sue Turner2, Mandy Williams2.   

Abstract

Appropriate standards for the assessment of fetal growth and birthweight are central to good clinical care, and have become even more important with increasing evidence that growth-related adverse outcomes are potentially avoidable. Standards need to be evidence based and validated against pregnancy outcome and able to demonstrate utility and effectiveness. A review of proposals by the Intergrowth consortium to adopt their single international standard finds little support for the claim that the cases that it identifies as small are due to malnutrition or stunting, and substantial evidence that there is normal physiologic variation between different countries and ethnic groups. It is possible that the one-size-fits-all standard ends up fitting no one and could be harmful if implemented. An alternative is the concept of country-specific charts that can improve the association between abnormal growth and adverse outcome. However, such standards ignore individual physiologic variation that affects fetal growth, which exists in any heterogeneous population and exceeds intercountry differences. It is therefore more logical to adjust for the characteristics of each mother, taking her ethnic origin and her height, weight, and parity into account, and to set a growth and birthweight standard for each pregnancy against which actual growth can be assessed. A customized standard better reflects adverse pregnancy outcome at both ends of the fetal size spectrum and has increased clinicians' confidence in growth assessment, while providing reassurance when abnormal size merely represents physiologic variation. Rollout in the United Kingdom has proceeded as part of the comprehensive Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP), and has resulted in a steady increase in antenatal detection of babies who are at risk because of fetal growth restriction. This in turn has been accompanied by a year-on-year drop in stillbirth rates to their lowest ever levels in England. A global version of customized growth charts with over 100 ethnic origin categories is being launched in 2018, and will provide an individualized, yet universally applicable, standard for fetal growth.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GROW; LGA; SGA; birthweight; customized chart; fetal growth; maternal size; perinatal; stillbirth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29422203     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  49 in total

Review 1.  Fetal growth surveillance - Current guidelines, practices and challenges.

Authors:  Mandy Williams; Sue Turner; Emily Butler; Jason Gardosi
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-22

2.  Fetal size standards to diagnose a small- or a large-for-gestational-age fetus.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Foetal lung volumes in pregnant women who deliver very preterm: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lisa Story; Tong Zhang; Johannes K Steinweg; Jana Hutter; Jacqueline Matthew; Theodore Dassios; Paul T Seed; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Joanna Allsop; Joseph V Hajnal; Anne Greenough; Andrew H Shennan; Mary Rutherford
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Placental Inositol Reduced in Gestational Diabetes as Glucose Alters Inositol Transporters and IMPA1 Enzyme Expression.

Authors:  Reshma A Pillai; Mohammed O Islam; Preben Selvam; Neha Sharma; Anne H Y Chu; Oliver C Watkins; Keith M Godfrey; Rohan M Lewis; Shiao Y Chan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Caveats in the monitoring of fetal growth using ultrasound estimated fetal weight.

Authors:  Nicholas John Dudley; Helen Varley
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-09-11

8.  Fetal growth standards for Somali population.

Authors:  Hiba J Mustafa; Katelyn M Tessier; Lauren A Reagan; Xianghua Luo; Stephen A Contag
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-09-23

9.  Personalized assessment of cervical length improves prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: a standard and a percentile calculator.

Authors:  Dereje W Gudicha; Roberto Romero; Doron Kabiri; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Percy Pacora; Offer Erez; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Eunjung Jung; Carmen Paredes; Stanley M Berry; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth Among Arab-American Women in Ohio.

Authors:  Ayaz Hyder; Kierra S Barnett
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.