Literature DB >> 29421333

The urinary metabolites of DINCH® have an impact on the activities of the human nuclear receptors ERα, ERβ, AR, PPARα and PPARγ.

Anika Engel1, Thorsten Buhrke2, Stefanie Kasper1, Anne-Cathrin Behr1, Albert Braeuning1, Sönke Jessel3, Albrecht Seidel3, Wolfgang Völkel4, Alfonso Lampen1.   

Abstract

DINCH® (di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate) is a non-phthalate plasticizer that has been developed to replace phthalate plasticizers such as DEHP (di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate) or DINP (di-isononyl phthalate). DINCH® is metabolized to its corresponding monoester and subsequently to oxidized monoester derivatives. These are conjugated to glucuronic acid and subject to urinary excretion. In contrast to DINCH®, there are almost no toxicological data available regarding its primary and secondary metabolites. The present study aimed at the characterization of potential endocrine properties of DINCH® and five DINCH® metabolites by using reporter gene assays to monitor the activity of the human nuclear receptors ERα, ERβ, AR, PPARα and PPARγ in vitro. DINCH® itself did not have any effect on the activity of these receptors whereas DINCH® metabolites were shown to activate all these receptors. In the case of AR, DINCH® metabolites predominantly enhanced dihydrotestosterone-stimulated AR activity. In the H295R steroidogenesis assay, neither DINCH® nor any of its metabolites affected estradiol or testosterone synthesis. In conclusion, primary and secondary DINCH® metabolites exert different effects at the molecular level compared to DINCH® itself. All these in vitro effects of DINCH® metabolites, however, were only observed at high concentrations such as 10 μM or above which is about three orders of magnitude above reported DINCH® metabolite concentrations in human urine. Thus, the in vitro data do not support the notion that DINCH® or any of the investigated metabolites may exert considerable endocrine effects in vivo at relevant human exposure levels.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; DINCH(®); Estrogen receptor; PPAR activation; Steroidogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29421333     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  11 in total

1.  Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives Have Diverse Associations with Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Thomas J van T Erve; Emma M Rosen; Emily S Barrett; Ruby H N Nguyen; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Ginger L Milne; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan; Kelly K Ferguson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Insights into the Endocrine Disrupting Activity of Emerging Non-Phthalate Alternate Plasticizers against Thyroid Hormone Receptor: A Structural Perspective.

Authors:  Torki A Zughaibi; Ishfaq Ahmad Sheikh; Mohd Amin Beg
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Urinary phthalate metabolites and alternatives and serum sex steroid hormones among pre- and postmenopausal women from NHANES, 2013-16.

Authors:  Sara E Long; Linda G Kahn; Leonardo Trasande; Melanie H Jacobson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Biomonitoring of emerging DINCH metabolites in pregnant women in charleston, SC: 2011-2014.

Authors:  Abby G Wenzel; Jessica L Reiner; Satomi Kohno; Bethany J Wolf; John W Brock; Lori Cruze; Roger B Newman; John R Kucklick
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 8.943

5.  Association of Parental Preconception Exposure to Phthalates and Phthalate Substitutes With Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Vicente Mustieles; Jennifer Yland; Joseph M Braun; Paige L Williams; Jill A Attaman; Jennifer B Ford; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

6.  Determinants and characterization of exposure to phthalates, DEHTP and DINCH among pregnant women in the PROTECT birth cohort in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Yanelli Rodríguez-Carmona; Pahriya Ashrap; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Zaira Rosario; Leah D Bedrosian; Gredia Huerta-Montanez; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker; Deborah Watkins
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Phasing out DEHP from plastic indwelling medical devices used for intensive care: Does it reduce the long-term attention deficit of critically ill children?

Authors:  Ilse Vanhorebeek; Govindan Malarvannan; Fabian Güiza; Giulia Poma; Inge Derese; Pieter J Wouters; Koen Joosten; Sascha Verbruggen; Philippe G Jorens; Adrian Covaci; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Maternal phthalate and phthalate alternative metabolites and urinary biomarkers of estrogens and testosterones across pregnancy.

Authors:  Diana C Pacyga; Joseph C Gardiner; Jodi A Flaws; Zhong Li; Antonia M Calafat; Susan A Korrick; Susan L Schantz; Rita S Strakovsky
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 13.352

Review 9.  The Endocrine Disruption of Prenatal Phthalate Exposure in Mother and Offspring.

Authors:  Yiyu Qian; Hailing Shao; Xinxin Ying; Wenle Huang; Ying Hua
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Comparison of In Vitro Endocrine Activity of Phthalates and Alternative Plasticizers.

Authors:  Hélène Moche; Aouatif Chentouf; Sergio Neves; Jean-Marc Corpart; Fabrice Nesslany
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.