Literature DB >> 29421107

Micro-plastic ingestion by waterbirds from contaminated wetlands in South Africa.

Chevonne Reynolds1, Peter G Ryan2.   

Abstract

Despite a large literature on the impacts of micro-plastic pollution in marine ecosystems, very little research has focused on these pollutants in freshwater ecosystems. Recently, however, a few studies have demonstrated that micro-plastic pollutants are ingested by freshwater taxa, including birds. To explore this potential environmental threat in African freshwater systems we quantified micro-plastic pollutants in the faeces and feather brushings of seven southern African duck species. We analysed 283 faecal samples and 408 feather brushings, and found that 5% of faecal samples and 10% of feather samples contained micro-plastic fibres. The presence and abundance of micro-fibres differed between sampling sites, with significantly higher amounts recorded for the site that received effluent from a sewage treatment facility. Additionally, micro-fibre presence differed across duck species, indicating that foraging behaviour affects plastic ingestion. Our study confirms that African freshwater ecosystems and the biodiversity they support are under threat from micro-plastic contamination.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Faeces; Freshwater; Micro-plastic fibre; Pollution; Waterfowl; Wetland bird

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29421107     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  8 in total

1.  Microplastics integrating the zooplanktonic fraction in a saline lake of Argentina: influence of water management.

Authors:  María Belén Alfonso; Andrés Hugo Arias; María Cintia Piccolo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Plastics in municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment plant effluents: challenges and opportunities for South Africa-a review.

Authors:  Austine O C Iroegbu; Rotimi E Sadiku; Suprakas S Ray; Yskandar Hamam
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: a review.

Authors:  Nastaran Razeghi; Amir Hossein Hamidian; Chenxi Wu; Yu Zhang; Min Yang
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.027

Review 4.  Plastic pollution: A focus on freshwater biodiversity.

Authors:  Valter M Azevedo-Santos; Marcelo F G Brito; Pedro S Manoel; Júlia F Perroca; Jorge Luiz Rodrigues-Filho; Lucas R P Paschoal; Geslaine R L Gonçalves; Milena R Wolf; Martín C M Blettler; Marcelo C Andrade; André B Nobile; Felipe P Lima; Ana M C Ruocco; Carolina V Silva; Gilmar Perbiche-Neves; Jorge L Portinho; Tommaso Giarrizzo; Marlene S Arcifa; Fernando M Pelicice
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.943

Review 5.  A Meta-Analysis of the Characterisations of Plastic Ingested by Fish Globally.

Authors:  Kok Ping Lim; Phaik Eem Lim; Sumiani Yusoff; Chengjun Sun; Jinfeng Ding; Kar Hoe Loh
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-11

6.  Atmospheric transport is a major pathway of microplastics to remote regions.

Authors:  N Evangeliou; H Grythe; Z Klimont; C Heyes; S Eckhardt; S Lopez-Aparicio; A Stohl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Anthropogenic particles in coypu (Myocastor coypus; Mammalia, Rodentia)' faeces: first evidence and considerations about their use as track for detecting microplastic pollution.

Authors:  Luca Gallitelli; Corrado Battisti; Loris Pietrelli; Massimiliano Scalici
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  The influence of seabirds on their breeding, roosting and nesting grounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan L Grant; Alexander L Bond; Jennifer L Lavers
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.