Literature DB >> 29420960

Long-Term Sirolimus for Primary Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Rabea Asleh1, Alexandros Briasoulis1, Walter K Kremers1, Rosalyn Adigun1, Barry A Boilson1, Naveen L Pereira1, Brooks S Edwards1, Alfredo L Clavell1, John A Schirger1, Richard J Rodeheffer1, Robert P Frantz1, Lyle D Joyce1, Simon Maltais1, John M Stulak1, Richard C Daly1, Jonella Tilford1, Woong-Gil Choi1, Amir Lerman1, Sudhir S Kushwaha2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small studies have reported superiority of sirolimus (SRL) over calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) in mitigating cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation (HT). However, data on the long-term effect on CAV progression and clinical outcomes are lacking.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the long-term safety and efficacy of conversion from CNI to SRL as maintenance therapy on CAV progression and outcomes after HT.
METHODS: A cohort of 402 patients who underwent HT and were either treated with CNI alone (n = 134) or converted from CNI to SRL (n = 268) as primary immunosuppression was analyzed. CAV progression was assessed using serial coronary intravascular ultrasound during treatment with CNI (n = 99) and after conversion to SRL (n = 235) in patients who underwent at least 2 intravascular ultrasound studies.
RESULTS: The progression in plaque volume (2.8 ± 2.3 mm3/mm vs. 0.46 ± 1.8 mm3/mm; p < 0.0001) and plaque index (plaque volume-to-vessel volume ratio) (12.2 ± 9.6% vs. 1.1 ± 7.9%; p < 0.0001) were significantly attenuated when treated with SRL compared with CNI. Over a mean follow-up period of 8.9 years from time of HT, all-cause mortality occurred in 25.6% of the patients and was lower during treatment with SRL compared with CNI (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 0.70; p = 0.0002), and CAV-related events were also less frequent during treatment with SRL (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.59; p < 0.0001). Further analyses suggested more attenuation of CAV and more favorable clinical outcomes with earlier conversion to SRL (≤2 years) compared with late conversion (>2 years) after HT.
CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion to SRL is associated with attenuated CAV progression and with lower long-term mortality and fewer CAV-related events compared with continued CNI use.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac allograft vasculopathy; coronary intravascular ultrasound; heart transplantation; immunosuppression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420960     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Transplantation: Sirolimus after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Gregory B Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Quantification of myocardial interstitial fibrosis and extracellular volume for the detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Ruud B van Heeswijk; Jessica A M Bastiaansen; Juan F Iglesias; Sophie Degrauwe; Samuel Rotman; Jean-Luc Barras; Julien Regamey; Nathalie Lauriers; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Jérôme Yerly; Giulia Ginami; Matthias Stuber; Roger Hullin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Immunosuppression and Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Nilay Sutaria; Lynne Sylvia; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors: successes and challenges as cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Muireann Ní Bhaoighill; Elaine A Dunlop
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2019-12-19

5.  Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia with PCSK9 inhibitors in patients after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Kühl; Christian Binner; Joanna Jozwiak; Julia Fischer; Jochen Hahn; Alaeldin Addas; Boris Dinov; Jens Garbade; Gerhard Hindricks; Michael Borger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of Sirolimus as a Primary Immunosuppressant on Myocardial Fibrosis and Diastolic Function Following Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Hilmi Alnsasra; Rabea Asleh; Jae K Oh; Joseph J Maleszewski; Amir Lerman; Takumi Toya; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Melanie C Bois; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 7.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions.

Authors:  Jordan S Pober; Sharon Chih; Jon Kobashigawa; Joren C Madsen; George Tellides
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Initial dose recommendation for sirolimus in paediatric kaposiform haemangioendothelioma patients based on population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Dong-Dong Wang; Hong Xu; Zhi-Ping Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Timing of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor initiation and allograft vasculopathy progression and outcomes in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Alexandros Briasoulis; Naveen L Pereira; Barry A Boilson; Brooks S Edwards; Rosalyn Adigun; Simon Maltais; Richard C Daly; Amir Lerman; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-07-17

10.  Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression Is Associated with Decreased Incidence of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Heart Transplantation: A Double-Center Study.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Darko Vucicevic; Tanya M Petterson; Walter K Kremers; Naveen L Pereira; Richard C Daly; Brooks S Edwards; D Eric Steidley; Robert L Scott; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.