Literature DB >> 29420869

Vulnerability of the Great Barrier Reef to climate change and local pressures.

Nicholas H Wolff1,2, Peter J Mumby1,3, Michelle Devlin4,5, Kenneth R N Anthony6.   

Abstract

Australia's Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under pressure from a suite of stressors including cyclones, crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), nutrients from river run-off and warming events that drive mass coral bleaching. Two key questions are: how vulnerable will the GBR be to future environmental scenarios, and to what extent can local management actions lower vulnerability in the face of climate change? To address these questions, we use a simple empirical and mechanistic coral model to explore six scenarios that represent plausible combinations of climate change projections (from four Representative Concentration Pathways, RCPs), cyclones and local stressors. Projections (2017-2050) indicate significant potential for coral recovery in the near-term, relative to current state, followed by climate-driven decline. Under a scenario of unmitigated emissions (RCP8.5) and business-as-usual management of local stressors, mean coral cover on the GBR is predicted to recover over the next decade and then rapidly decline to only 3% by year 2050. In contrast, a scenario of strong carbon mitigation (RCP2.6) and improved water quality, predicts significant coral recovery over the next two decades, followed by a relatively modest climate-driven decline that sustained coral cover above 26% by 2050. In an analysis of the impacts of cumulative stressors on coral cover relative to potential coral cover in the absence of such impacts, we found that GBR-wide reef performance will decline 27%-74% depending on the scenario. Up to 66% of performance loss is attributable to local stressors. The potential for management to reduce vulnerability, measured here as the mean number of years coral cover can be kept above 30%, is spatially variable. Management strategies that alleviate cumulative impacts have the potential to reduce the vulnerability of some midshelf reefs in the central GBR by 83%, but only if combined with strong mitigation of carbon emissions.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Acroporazzm321990; Paris climate accord; bleaching; coral reefs; cumulative stressors; vulnerability; water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420869     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  10 in total

1.  Decision analysis to support wastewater management in coral reef priority area.

Authors:  Megan D Barnes; Whitney Goodell; Robert Whittier; Kim A Falinski; Tova Callender; Hla Htun; Cecilia LeViol; Hudson Slay; Kirsten L L Oleson
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Culling corallivores improves short-term coral recovery under bleaching scenarios.

Authors:  Jacob G D Rogers; Éva E Plagányi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  High flow conditions mediate damaging impacts of sub-lethal thermal stress on corals' endosymbiotic algae.

Authors:  C E Page; W Leggat; S F Heron; A J Fordyce; T D Ainsworth
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Three decades of heat stress exposure in Caribbean coral reefs: a new regional delineation to enhance conservation.

Authors:  Aarón Israel Muñiz-Castillo; Andrea Rivera-Sosa; Iliana Chollett; C Mark Eakin; Luisa Andrade-Gómez; Melanie McField; Jesús Ernesto Arias-González
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cold-water coral (Lophelia pertusa) response to multiple stressors: High temperature affects recovery from short-term pollution exposure.

Authors:  Alexis M Weinnig; Carlos E Gómez; Adam Hallaj; Erik E Cordes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Large-scale interventions may delay decline of the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Scott A Condie; Kenneth R N Anthony; Russ C Babcock; Mark E Baird; Roger Beeden; Cameron S Fletcher; Rebecca Gorton; Daniel Harrison; Alistair J Hobday; Éva E Plagányi; David A Westcott
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Coral reefs: The good and not so good news with future bright and dark spots for coral reefs through climate change.

Authors:  Michelle J Devlin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Co-occurring anthropogenic stressors reduce the timeframe of environmental viability for the world's coral reefs.

Authors:  Renee O Setter; Erik C Franklin; Camilo Mora
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 9.593

9.  Split spawning increases robustness of coral larval supply and inter-reef connectivity.

Authors:  Karlo Hock; Christopher Doropoulos; Rebecca Gorton; Scott A Condie; Peter J Mumby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Mangroves reduce the vulnerability of coral reef fisheries to habitat degradation.

Authors:  Alice Rogers; Peter J Mumby
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.