| Literature DB >> 29420740 |
Longhua Zhou1,2, Tao Yan1, Xin Chen1, Zhilan Li1, Dezhi Wu1, Shuijin Hua3, Lixi Jiang1.
Abstract
Global warming causes a faster incrEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29420740 PMCID: PMC5888911 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Design of the temperature treatment experiment in growth chambers. Plants were moved to growth chambers after the opening of the first flower. Different daily temperature cycles were set in two growth chambers, namely growth chamber 1 (GCB1) and GCB2. Curves indicate the daily temperature changes in the low (diamonds) and high (squares) NT chambers. The gray shaded area shows the time zone between 21.00 h and 05.00 h when the light was off in the chambers. Light in the chambers was on during 05.00–21.00 h. The arrows point to the time when developing seeds for RNA extraction were collected.
RNA-seq analysis codes for the eight treatments combining the factors such as NT, genotype, and sample harvesting time
| Codes | Genotype | NT treatment | Harvest time |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | JR | High NT | 14.00 h |
| B | JR | High NT | 05.00 h |
| C | JR | Low NT | 14.00 h |
| D | JR | Low NT | 05.00 h |
| E | ZY | High NT | 14.00 h |
| F | ZY | High NT | 05.00 h |
| G | ZY | Low NT | 14.00 h |
| H | ZY | Low NT | 05.00 h |
Fig. 2.Comparisons of total FAs and FA compositions between low and high NT treatments. (A) Absolute values based on the means of biological repetitions showing total FA contents and various FA species. (B) Relative percentages of FAs in seed samples treated with low and high NTs. Asterisk indicates significant difference at P≤0.05 levels between the low and high NT treatments by t-test.
Fig. 3.Overall number of expressed genes detected and gene expression level. (A) Comparison of the expressed gene numbers between eight treatments (A–H), (B) low and high NT treatments, (C) different time points when samples were harvested, and (D) two cultivars. The letters A, B, E, F represent low NT and C, D, G, H represent high NT on the X-axis in (A) represent high and low NT treatments, respectively. The open and filled circles) in (A) indicate the harvest time at 05.00 h and 14.00 h, respectively. Values are denoted in means of two repetitions in (A) and four treatments with two repetitions each in (B–D).
Fig. 4.K-means cluster analysis for transcriptional changes in the oilseed rape genome against treatments A–H defined in Table 1. Nine groups of genes were classified as subcluster 1 (SBC1) to SBC9. The number of genes in each SBC is indicated in parentheses. The scales on the y-axis should be magnified 1000 times.
Fig. 5.Pairwise comparisons of the number of DEGs and ratios of DEGs between the low and high NT treatments (A) Number of DEGs. (B) Ratios of up- and down-regulated genes. White and dark gray bars indicate lower and higher gene expression in samples treated with high NT relative to those treated with low NT, respectively. A–H represent the eight treatments defined in Table 1. Up-regulation (or down-regulation) is defined as the log2X ≥1 (or log2X ≤1), where X equals the ratio of the transcriptional level of genes in samples treated with high NT divided by those treated with low NT.
DEGs enriched on the pathways involving FA metabolism
| Pathways | A/C | B/D | E/G | F/H | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥1 | ≦ –1 | ≥1 | ≦-1 | ≥1 | ≦ –1 | ≥1 | ≦ –1 | |
| Circadian rhythm | 0 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Carbon fixation | 0 | 4 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 2 |
| Photosynthesis | 0 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
| Cutin biosynthesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| Glycerolipid metabolism | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 2 |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 3 |
| Fatty acid biosynthesis | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 1 |
| Fatty acid elongation | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Fatty acid metabolism | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Unsaturated FA biosynthesis | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
| α-Linolenic acid | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Protein processing in ER | 1 | 17 | 16 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 5 | 4 |
| Glyoxylate metabolism | 0 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis | 1 | 2 | 20 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 1 |
| Starch metabolism | 6 | 12 | 43 | 25 | 23 | 24 | 34 | 21 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 3 |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 0 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| Brassinosteroid biosynthesis | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Indole alkaloid biosynthesis | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
| Plant hormone signal | 4 | 11 | 38 | 28 | 16 | 38 | 35 | 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatments A–H are defined as in Table 1.
DEGs caused by different NTs in pathways involving GA signaling in samples harvested at 05.00 h in the dark
| Gene ID | Detected in genotype | Arabidopsis orthologs | Up- or down-regulation caused by high NT | Annotation of gene function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (1.8/1.36) | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR |
| Up (2.28 | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (2.46 | GA biosynthesis |
|
| ZY |
| Up (1.37) | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (1.62/1.36) | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (1.92/1.28) | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR |
| Up (1.74) | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR |
| Up (4.2 | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (7.52 | GA biosynthesis |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (6.62 | GA biosynthesis |
|
| ZY |
| Down (–82.3 | GA negative regulator |
|
| JR | None | Down (–2.7 | GA negative regulator |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Down (–1.46/–2.06 | GA negative regulator |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Up (1.7/1.75) | GA negative regulator |
|
| JR and ZY |
| Down (–1.06)/Up (1.4) | GA negative regulator |
|
| ZY |
| Down (–1.21) | GA negative regulator |
|
| JR |
| Down (–2.34 | Response to GA |
|
| JR |
| Down (–2.36 | Response to GA |
|
| JR |
| Down (–2.03 | Response to GA |
In the fourth column, the asterisks indicate >4-fold up- or down-regulation caused by high NT, and the slashes separate the data for JR and ZY.
DEGs caused by different NTs in pathways involving β-oxidation and glyoxylate metabolism
| Gene ID | Detected in genotype | Arabidopsis orthologs | Up-regulation caused by high NT | Annotation of gene function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| JR and ZY |
| 1.17/1.15 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 1.12/1.37 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| JR |
| 1.39 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| JR |
| 1.17 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| ZY |
| 1.36 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 2.21 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
| JR |
| 2.26 | Fatty acid β-oxidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JR and ZY |
| 4.13 | Glyoxylate cycle |
| BnaA05g25050D | JR and ZY |
| 1.73/1.86 | Glyoxylate cycle |
| BnaC05g39220D | JR and ZY |
| 1.73/1.05 | Glyoxylate cycle |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 1.06/1.23 | Glyoxylate cycle |
|
| ZY |
| 1.32 | Glyoxylate cycle |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 4.86 | Glyoxylate cycle |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 1.93/1.11 | Glyoxylate cycle |
|
| JR and ZY |
| 1.19/1.05 | Glyoxylate cycle |
In the fourth column, the asterisks indicate>4-fold up-regulation caused by high NT, and the slashes separate the data for JR and ZY.
The rows in bold show the rate-limiting enzymes in glyoxylate metabolism pathways.
CTS, COMATOSE; ACX4, ACYL-COA OXIDASE 4; AIM1, ABNORMAL INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM1; PMDH2, PEROXISOMAL NAD-MALATE DEHYDROGENASE 2; ICL, ISOCITRATE LYASE; MLS, MALATE SYNTHASE; GOX1, GLYCOLATE OXIDASE 1; ACN1, ACETATE NON-UTILIZING 1; CSY, CITRATE SYNTHASE.
Fig. 6.Comparison between RT-qPCR and RNA-seq results for DEGs caused by different NTs. (A and C) Results from RT-qPCR. (B and D) Results from RNA-seq. (A) and (B) are DEGs on the GA synthesis pathway, and (C) and (D) are DEGs on the β-oxidation pathway. The numbers are log2X-normalized ratio values corresponding to the transcriptional level of genes in samples treated with high NT divided by those treated with low NT. Red color represents higher gene expression levels of those treated with high NT than those treated with low NT. Green color corresponds to lower gene expression levels of those treated with high NT than those treated with low NT. The darkness of the red or green color represents the absolute value of up- or down-regulation by high NT. The blocks without a numerical value indicate that the gene expression was not detected by RNA-seq.
Fig. 7.Schematic representation of the influence of high NT on FA anabolism and catabolism biosynthetic pathways. High NT promoted the expression of the genes in the FA biosynthesis pathway (Table 2; Supplementary Table S17), in particular FAD2 and FAD3, but also the genes enhancing GA signal (Fig. 6). The enhanced GA signal resulted in the increased expression of SFAR genes (Supplementary Table S9) (right). The free FAs are subjected to β-oxidation, a process in which FAs are degraded into acetyl-CoA. Subsequently, acetyl-CoA is converted into 4-C compounds via the glyoxylate cycle, which occurs partially in the peroxisome (left). The numbers in parentheses indicate the up-regulated folds of the genes in relevant cycles. FAD, fatty acid desaturase; MLS, malate synthase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; MFP, multifunctional protein; KAT, 3-keto-acyl-CoA thiolase; ACT, anthocyanin 5-aromatic acyltransferase; ICL, isocitrate lyase; and cts, comatose.