Literature DB >> 29420407

Maternal Malignancy Evaluation After Discordant Cell-Free DNA Results.

Laura M Carlson1, Emily Hardisty, Catherine C Coombs, Neeta L Vora.   

Abstract

Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy is a commonly used testing strategy in pregnancies at high risk for fetal aneuploidy. The use of cell-free DNA screening is expanding to the low-risk population, because the detection rate for trisomy 21 surpasses that of traditional screening modalities. Although the sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA are superior to traditional screening, false-positive results do occur and may indicate an adverse maternal health condition, including maternal mosaicism or, rarely, malignancy. The risk of maternal cancer is significantly elevated when more than one aneuploidy is detected that is discordant from fetal karyotype. Given this risk as well as the rising incidence of cancer in pregnancy, patient counseling and malignancy evaluation should be considered in women when more than one aneuploidy is detected. We reviewed the published literature and developed an algorithm to evaluate women when these results are identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420407      PMCID: PMC5823781          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis 2: NIPT results suggesting maternal cancer should always be disclosed.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Sharon E Plon; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of routine non-invasive test data allows cancer prediction: A single-center retrospective analysis of over 85,000 pregnancies.

Authors:  Liesbeth Lenaerts; Nathalie Brison; Charlotte Maggen; Leen Vancoillie; Huiwen Che; Peter Vandenberghe; Daan Dierickx; Lucienne Michaux; Barbara Dewaele; Patrick Neven; Giuseppe Floris; Thomas Tousseyn; Lore Lannoo; Tatjana Jatsenko; Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Kristel Van Calsteren; Vincent Vandecaveye; Luc Dehaspe; Koenraad Devriendt; Eric Legius; Kris Van Den Bogaert; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  More than an Incidentaloma: The Nonreportable NIPT.

Authors:  Allison M Jay; Brian Mason; Daniel Lebovic; Paul Chuba
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Incidental finding of maternal malignancy in an unusual non-invasive prenatal test and a review of similar cases.

Authors:  Maria Hammer Moellgaard; Ida Charlotte Bay Lund; Naja Becher; Anne-Bine Skytte; Lotte Andreasen; Malgorzata Ilona Srebniak; Ida Vogel
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-10-11

5.  First Case Report of Maternal Mosaic Tetrasomy 9p Incidentally Detected on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Wendy Shu; Shirley S W Cheng; Shuwen Xue; Lin Wai Chan; Sung Inda Soong; Anita Sik Yau Kan; Sunny Wai Hung Cheung; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.