Literature DB >> 29420389

Variability and Reliability of Punching Impact Kinetics in Untrained Participants and Experienced Boxers.

Seth Lenetsky1,2, Matt Brughelli1, Roy J Nates3, Matt R Cross1, Anna V Lormier1,4.   

Abstract

Lenetsky, S, Brughelli, M, Nates, RJ, Cross, MR, and Lormier, AV. Variability and reliability of punching impact kinetics in untrained participants and experienced boxers. J Strength Cond Res 32(7): 1838-1842, 2017-Striking impact kinetics are central to performance in combat sports. Despite a multitude of assessment, few in the literature have explored the variability and reliability of punching force assessment. Consequently, this study assessed the variability and reliability of measured punching impact kinetics in untrained and experienced boxers using a recently developed and validated method of striking dynamometry. Intrasession (both cohorts) and intersession (untrained only) measures of impulse, peak, and mean force were determined across 4 punch types (jabs, crosses, lead, and rear hand hooks) using coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and typical error of measurement (TEM). Moderate (ICC <0.67 or CV >10%) to small (ICC >0.67 and CV <10%) variability was found for intrasession results of both groups, the majority having small variability. Intersession findings of the untrained cohort had a similar spread of variability, but with the majority exhibiting moderate variability. All variables except for mean force of the cross in the experienced boxer cohort were found to exhibit a "moderated" magnitude of reliability determined by standardized TEM scores (TEM = 0.60-1.19) during intrasession testing. All variables had moderate reliability during intersession. This method was found to have acceptable variability and reliability when monitoring punching impact kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420389     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Three Ultra-Portable Vertical Jump Assessment Technologies.

Authors:  Casey M Watkins; Ed Maunder; Roland van den Tillaar; Dustin J Oranchuk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Validation of a Novel Boxing Monitoring System to Detect and Analyse the Centre of Pressure Movement on the Boxer's Fist.

Authors:  Tobias Menzel; Wolfgang Potthast
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Application of a Validated Innovative Smart Wearable for Performance Analysis by Experienced and Non-Experienced Athletes in Boxing.

Authors:  Tobias Menzel; Wolfgang Potthast
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Functional performance of the upper limb and the most common boxing-related injuries in male boxers: a retrospective, observational, comparative study with non-boxing population.

Authors:  Vasileios Giannatos; Andreas Panagopoulos; Panagiotis Antzoulas; Savvas I Giakoumakis; John Lakoumentas; Antonis Kouzelis
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Acute effects of ballistic versus heavy-resistance exercises on countermovement jump and rear-hand straight punch performance in amateur boxers.

Authors:  Wenjuan Yi; Chao Chen; Zixiang Zhou; Weijia Cui; Dexin Wang
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-28

6.  Biomechanical assessment of various punching techniques.

Authors:  Jiri Adamec; Peter Hofer; Stefan Pittner; Fabio Monticelli; Matthias Graw; Jutta Schöpfer
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.