Literature DB >> 29420168

Obstetric Outcomes and Delivery-Related Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Pregnant Women With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Lindsay K Admon1,2,3,4,5,6, Tyler N A Winkelman7,8, Michele Heisler1,2,3,9,10, Vanessa K Dalton2,4,5.   

Abstract

Our objective was to measure obstetric outcomes and delivery-related health care utilization and costs among pregnant women with multiple chronic conditions. We used 2013-2014 data from the National Inpatient Sample to measure obstetric outcomes and delivery-related health care utilization and costs among women with no chronic conditions, 1 chronic condition, and multiple chronic conditions. Women with multiple chronic conditions were at significantly higher risk than women with 1 chronic condition or no chronic conditions across all outcomes measured. High-value strategies are needed to improve birth outcomes among vulnerable mothers and their infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420168      PMCID: PMC5814150          DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis        ISSN: 1545-1151            Impact factor:   2.830


Objective

Complications from chronic conditions are a key driver of rising obstetric morbidity and mortality in the United States (1). The prevalence of chronic conditions, including multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), continues to rise among childbearing women (2,3). MCCs, defined as 2 or more chronic conditions, are associated with worse health outcomes, including death, and higher levels of health care utilization and costs among the non-pregnant adult population (4). Understanding these data influenced the development of high-value programs that improved health outcomes and lowered costs in high-risk, high-cost populations (5). Our objective was to measure obstetric outcomes and delivery-related health care utilization and costs among pregnant women with MCCs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 2013–2014 data from the National Inpatient Sample (6), a nationally representative sample of hospital discharges in the United States. Deliveries were identified by using previous methods (7), and data for chronic conditions were abstracted by using relevant codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) (8) (Box). We included 8 chronic conditions that are prevalent in the childbearing population and associated with obstetric morbidity and mortality: chronic respiratory disease, chronic hypertension, substance use disorders, pre-existing diabetes, chronic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and chronic liver disease (3,9). Obstetric outcomes included preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, and severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Preterm delivery was measured by using ICD-9-CM code 644.21, and cesarean delivery was measured by using ICD-9-CM codes 740.x, 741.x, 742.x, 744.x, and 749.9. Severe maternal morbidity was measured by using standardized diagnosis and procedure codes outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (10). Health care utilization measures included need for hospital transfer and length of stay. Delivery-associated hospital charges from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s cost-to-charge ratio files were used to calculate costs. Charge and cost estimates were adjusted for inflation to 2014 dollars. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate obstetric outcomes. We generated estimates for hospital transfer, length of stay, and costs by using multivariable Poisson regression models, because these data were not normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test, P < .001 for each). All estimates were population averages generated with post-regression predictive margins and tabulated per 100 delivery hospitalizations. Models were adjusted for age, rural versus urban residence, primary insurance payer, median household income for the patient’s zip code, and hospital region. In sensitivity analyses of our cost estimates, we controlled for obstetric outcomes to isolate the independent association between MCCs and cost. We used complete case analysis rather than imputation, because less than 3% of observations had missing data. All analyses were conducted using STATA version 14.2 (StataCorp LLC). Our analysis of de-identified data was exempt from review by the study site’s institutional review board.

Results

Our sample consisted of 1,508,413 unweighted delivery hospitalizations, representing 7,542,063 weighted delivery hospitalizations occurring nationally in 2013–2014. We identified MCCs in 12,567 unweighted delivery hospitalizations (weighted percentage, 0.83%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80%–0.86%) and 1 chronic condition in 127,350 unweighted delivery hospitalizations (weighted percentage, 8.4%; 95% CI, 8.3%–8.6%). Women with MCCs were older than women with 1 chronic condition or no chronic conditions (30.2 y, 28.5 y, and 28.2 y, respectively) (Table 1). A higher proportion of women with MCCs (63.8%) had Medicaid as their primary payer compared with the proportion of women with 1 chronic condition (53.2%) or no chronic conditions (42.9%).
Table 1

Characteristics of Patients With No Chronic Conditions, 1 Chronic Condition, and Multiple Chronic Conditions (Unweighted N = 1,508,413), National Inpatient Sample, 2013–2014a

CharacteristicNo Chronic Conditions (n = 1,368,496)1 Chronic Condition (n = 127,350)Multiple (≥2) Chronic Conditions (n = 12,567)
Mean ageb, y 28.2 (28.1–28.3)28.5 (28.5–28.6)30.2 (30.0–30.3)
Payer
Medicaid42.9 (42.1–43.7)53.2 (52.3–54.1)63.8 (62.5–65.1)
Private51.3 (50.5–52.2)42.4 (41.4–43.3)32.2 (30.9–33.5)
Uninsured5.8 (5.5–6.0)4.4 (4.2–4.7)4.0 (3.6–4.4)
Bottom income quartilec 27.1 (26.3–27.9)33.4 (32.4–34.5)40.4 (38.9–41.9)
Rural residence 14.1 (13.6–14.5)14.6 (14.0–15.3)13.7 (12.8–14.6)
Hospital region
Northeast15.9 (15.2–16.7)17.6 (16.6–18.7)17.2 (15.7–18.8)
Midwest21.2 (20.4–22.0)22.1 (21.0–23.1)22.2 (20.7–23.9)
South38.4 (37.4–39.5)38.3 (37.0–39.6)39.9 (38.0–41.9)
West24.5 (23.6–25.4)22.0 (21.0–23.1)20.6 (19.3–22.0)

All data presented as weighted percentage (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise noted.

Weighted mean (95% confidence interval).

Patients living in a zip code with a median household income in the bottom national income quartile.

All data presented as weighted percentage (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise noted. Weighted mean (95% confidence interval). Patients living in a zip code with a median household income in the bottom national income quartile. Among pregnant women hospitalized for obstetric delivery, rates of preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, and severe maternal morbidity and mortality were significantly higher among women with MCCs than among women with no chronic condition or 1 chronic condition (Table 2). The rate of severe maternal morbidity and mortality among women with MCCs (6.4 per 100 delivery hospitalizations) was nearly 4 times higher than among women with no chronic conditions (1.7 per 100 delivery hospitalizations). Similarly, health care utilization and costs were highest among women with MCCs compared with those with no chronic condition or 1 chronic condition, even after controlling for obstetric outcomes and length of stay (Table 3). Women with 1 chronic condition were also at significantly higher risk than women with no chronic conditions across each outcome measured.
Table 2

Weighted National Estimates of Delivery-Related Outcomes Among Patients With No Chronic Conditions, 1 Chronic Condition, and Multiple Chronic Conditions, National Inpatient Sample, 2013–2014a

OutcomeNo Chronic Conditions1 Chronic ConditionMultiple (≥2) Chronic Conditions
Health outcomes
Preterm delivery (<37 weeks)5.7 (5.6–5.7)9.7 (9.5–10.0)15.1 (14.4–15.9)
Cesarean delivery31.9 (31.7–32.2)41.2 (40.8–41.6)53.3 (52.3–54.2)
Severe maternal morbidity and mortality1.7 (1.7–1.7)3.0 (2.8–3.1)6.4 (5.9–6.8)
Health care use
Hospital transfer1.1 (0.9–1.2)2.0 (1.8–2.3)3.5 (3.1–4.0)
Length of stay, in daysb 2.6 (2.6–2.6)3.1 (3.1–3.2)4.3 (4.2–4.3)
Health care expenditures, $c
Mean charges per delivery hospitalization16,000 (16,000–17,000)20,000 (19,000–20,000)28,000 (27,000–29,000)
Mean cost per delivery hospitalization4,500 (4,400–4,500)5,600 (5,500–5,600)7,700 (7,500–8,000)

All data presented as rate per 100 delivery hospitalizations (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise noted. Adjusted for age, rural vs urban residence, payer, national income quartile for zip code of residence, and hospital region.

Weighted mean (95% confidence interval).

Inflation-adjusted to 2014 US dollars.

Table 3

Weighted National Estimates of Mean Cost (95% CI)a per Delivery Hospitalization Among Patients With No Chronic Condition, 1 Chronic Condition, and Multiple Chronic Conditions, National Inpatient Sample, 2013–2014

Model Adjustmentb No Chronic Conditions1 Chronic ConditionMultiple (≥2) Chronic Conditions
Severe maternal morbidity and mortality4,500 (4,400–4,500)5,500 (5,400–5,600)7,300 (7,100–7,500)
Preterm delivery4,500 (4,400–4,500)5,500 (5,400–5,600)7,400 (7,200–7,600)
Cesarean delivery4,500 (4,400–4,600)5,300 (5,200–5,400)6,900 (6,700–7,100)
Length of stay4,500 (4,400–4,500)5,500 (5,400–5,600)7,400 (7,200–7,600)
All outcomes4,500 (4,500–4,600)5,200 (5,100–5,200)6,200 (6,000–6,400)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Inflation-adjusted to 2014 US dollars.

In addition to the following demographic covariates: age, rural vs urban residence, payer, national income quartile for zip code of residence, and hospital region.

All data presented as rate per 100 delivery hospitalizations (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise noted. Adjusted for age, rural vs urban residence, payer, national income quartile for zip code of residence, and hospital region. Weighted mean (95% confidence interval). Inflation-adjusted to 2014 US dollars. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval. Inflation-adjusted to 2014 US dollars. In addition to the following demographic covariates: age, rural vs urban residence, payer, national income quartile for zip code of residence, and hospital region.

Discussion

In this nationally representative sample of delivery hospitalizations from 2013–2014, women with MCCs had worse health outcomes, higher levels of health care utilization, and greater hospital costs associated with obstetric delivery compared with women with no chronic conditions or 1 chronic condition. In particular, the rate of severe maternal morbidity and mortality was 276% higher among women with MCCs than among women with no chronic conditions. Hospital costs were highest among patients with MCCs compared with those with no chronic condition or 1 chronic condition — even after even after controlling for obstetric outcomes and length of stay. It is plausible that higher costs may have resulted from greater use of consultative or social services, data that were not captured by our methods. A limitation of our study design is that clinicians were likely to document ICD-9-CM codes only for conditions that were addressed during a delivery hospitalization. As such, our point estimates of MCC prevalence are likely to be conservative. For example, some women with MCCs may have been misclassified as having 1 chronic condition or no chronic conditions. Total costs associated with MCCs are also likely to be larger than our estimates. For example, women with MCCs had higher rates of preterm delivery, and considerable neonatal costs are associated with preterm birth (11). Our findings show that pregnant women with MCCs are a high-risk, high-cost population. The strong association between MCCs and worse delivery-related health outcomes found in our study suggests that MCCs may contribute to the high levels of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. MCCs also contribute significantly to the cost of delivery hospitalizations. Delineating the highest-risk and highest-cost combinations of conditions may provide crucial data for the development of high-value strategies to improve birth outcomes among these vulnerable mothers and their infants.
ConditionCodes
Chronic respiratory disease491.x–496.x
Chronic hypertension401.x–405.x, 642.0x, 642.1x, 642.2x, 642.7x
Substance use disorders303.01, 303.02, 303.03, 304.x, 305.0x, 305.2x–305.9x, 648.3x
Pre-existing diabetes249.x, 250.x, 648.0x
Chronic heart disease412.x–414.x, 394.x-397.x, 424.x, 428.22, 428.23, 428.32, 428.33, 428.42, 428.43, 745.0x–747.4x, 648.5x
Chronic renal disease581.x-583.x, 585.x, 587.x, 588.x, 646.2x
Chronic liver disease571.x, 572.x
Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome042.x, V08.x
  7 in total

1.  Influence of patient comorbidities on the risk of near-miss maternal morbidity or mortality.

Authors:  Jill M Mhyre; Brian T Bateman; Lisa R Leffert
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Susan F Meikle; Samuel F Posner; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-10

3.  Preterm birth-associated cost of early intervention services: an analysis by gestational age.

Authors:  Karen M Clements; Wanda D Barfield; M Femi Ayadi; Nancy Wilber
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Pooja Bansil; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Jill M Mhyre; William M Callaghan; Elena V Kuklina
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Disparities in Chronic Conditions Among Women Hospitalized for Delivery in the United States, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Lindsay K Admon; Tyler N A Winkelman; Michelle H Moniz; Matthew M Davis; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Models of Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients: An Evidence Synthesis.

Authors:  Douglas McCarthy; Jamie Ryan; Sarah Klein
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2015-10

Review 7.  Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs.

Authors:  Christine Vogeli; Alexandra E Shields; Todd A Lee; Teresa B Gibson; William D Marder; Kevin B Weiss; David Blumenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Differences in outpatient, emergency, and inpatient use among pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis.

Authors:  Natasia S Courchesne-Krak; Wayne Kepner; Amanda Rubano; Carla Marienfeld
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-01-03

2.  Antepartum hospital use and delivery outcomes in California.

Authors:  Denise Monti; Chen Y Wang; Lynn M Yee; Joe Feinglass
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 3.  Association between pre-pregnancy multimorbidity and adverse maternal outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hilary K Brown; Anthony McKnight; Amira Aker
Journal:  J Multimorb Comorb       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Antenatal Admissions Among Women with Opioid-Affected and Non-Opioid-Affected Deliveries.

Authors:  Laura J Faherty; Ashley M Kranz; Joshua Russell-Fritch; Teague Ruder; Stephen W Patrick; Bradley D Stein
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-09

5.  Profile of Chronic Comorbid Conditions and Obstetrical Complications Among Pregnant Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States.

Authors:  Kartik K Venkatesh; Leavitt Morrison; Ruth E Tuomala; Alice Stek; Jennifer S Read; David E Shapiro; Elizabeth G Livingston
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Preconception care and severe maternal morbidity in the United States.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Kellie Schueler; L Philip Schumm; Manoradhan Murugesan; Debra B Stulberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-12-04

7.  Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies of pregnant women with pre-existing multimorbidity.

Authors:  Kelly-Ann Eastwood; Ngawai Moss; Shakila Thangaratinam; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Mairead Black; Siang Ing Lee; Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo; Anuradhaa Subramanian; Astha Anand; Beck Taylor; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Christopher Yau; Colin McCowan; Dermot O'Reilly; Holly Hope; Jonathan Ian Kennedy; Kathryn Mary Abel; Louise Locock; Peter Brocklehurst; Rachel Plachcinski; Sinead Brophy; Utkarsh Agrawal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Epidemiology of pre-existing multimorbidity in pregnant women in the UK in 2018: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo; Utkarsh Agrawal; Jonathan I Kennedy; Dermot O'Reilly; Kathryn M Abel; Sinead Brophy; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Colin McCowan; Siang Ing Lee; Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe; Holly Hope; Anuradhaa Subramanian; Astha Anand; Beck Taylor; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Christine Damase-Michel; Christopher Yau; Francesca Crowe; Gillian Santorelli; Kelly-Ann Eastwood; Zoe Vowles; Maria Loane; Ngawai Moss; Peter Brocklehurst; Rachel Plachcinski; Shakila Thangaratinam; Mairead Black
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Development and Validation of an Obstetric Comorbidity Risk Score for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Halley Ruppel; Vincent X Liu; Patricia Kipnis; Monique M Hedderson; Mara Greenberg; Heather Forquer; Brian Lawson; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-11-02

10.  Trends in maternal body mass index in Northern Ireland: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Authors:  Lisa Kent; Christopher Cardwell; Ian Young; Kelly-Ann Eastwood
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2021-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.