Literature DB >> 29419943

The role of social context in symptom appraisal and help-seeking among people with lung or colorectal symptoms: A qualitative interview study.

C Dobson1, A Russell2, S Brown3, G Rubin1.   

Abstract

Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, and the patient interval appears to be a substantial contributor to the overall length of the diagnostic interval. This study sought to understand how the broader context of people's lives influenced symptom appraisal and help-seeking, comparing experiences by length of the patient interval. Patients referred with a suspicion of lung or colorectal cancer were invited to complete a questionnaire about their symptoms, with 26 respondents purposively sampled to take part in a semi-structured interview about their patient intervals. Embodied experience, appraisal, help-seeking decision-making and consultation were identified as component stages of the patient interval, with the factors affecting movement between these stages located in one of four contextual domains: individual experience, interpersonal relationships, healthcare system interactions and social and temporal context. The length of the patient interval was related to the type of symptom(s) experienced, discussion of symptoms with others and the social responsibilities people held during symptomatic periods. A contextual model of the patient interval illustrates the stages and domains of this interval, as grounded in the data from this study. The model has potential application to future studies examining the patient interval for a range of symptoms.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; diagnostic interval; help-seeking; patient interval; symptom appraisal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29419943     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  6 in total

Review 1.  Defining timeliness in care for patients with lung cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Adnan Ansar; Virginia Lewis; Christine Faye McDonald; Chaojie Liu; Muhammad Aziz Rahman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Patient symptom experience prior to a diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric cancer: a multi-methods study.

Authors:  Elka Humphrys; Fiona M Walter; Greg Rubin; Jon D Emery; Margaret Johnson; Anthony Richards; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Yirupaiahgari Ks Viswanath; Jenni Burt
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Is healthcare-seeking with gynaecological alarm symptoms influenced by personal and professional relations? A Danish population-based, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anja Schmidt Vejlgaard; Sanne Rasmussen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluation of a web-based, tailored intervention to encourage help-seeking for lung cancer symptoms: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Mueller; Alan Davies; Caroline Jay; Simon Harper; Chris Todd
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-05-04

5.  Engaging high-risk groups in early lung cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of symptom presentation and intervention preferences among the UK's most deprived communities.

Authors:  Grace McCutchan; Julia Hiscock; Kerenza Hood; Peter Murchie; Richard D Neal; Gareth Newton; Sara Thomas; Ann Maria Thomas; Kate Brain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Experiences along the diagnostic pathway for patients with advanced lung cancer in the USA: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Morhaf Al Achkar; Monica Zigman Suchsland; Fiona M Walter; Richard D Neal; Bernardo H L Goulart; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.