| Literature DB >> 29419782 |
Congzheng Wang1,2,3, Song Hu4, Chunming Gao5, Chang Feng6.
Abstract
In this work, we irradiated a high-definition (HD) industrial camera based on a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) CMOS image sensor (CIS) with Cobalt-60 gamma-rays. All components of the camera under test were fabricated without radiation hardening, except for the lens. The irradiation experiments of the HD camera under biased conditions were carried out at 1.0, 10.0, 20.0, 50.0 and 100.0 Gy/h. During the experiment, we found that the tested camera showed a remarkable degradation after irradiation and differed in the dose rates. With the increase of dose rate, the same target images become brighter. Under the same dose rate, the radiation effect in bright area is lower than that in dark area. Under different dose rates, the higher the dose rate is, the worse the radiation effect will be in both bright and dark areas. And the standard deviations of bright and dark areas become greater. Furthermore, through the progressive degradation analysis of the captured image, experimental results demonstrate that the attenuation of signal to noise ratio (SNR) versus radiation time is not obvious at the same dose rate, and the degradation is more and more serious with increasing dose rate. Additionally, the decrease rate of SNR at 20.0, 50.0 and 100.0 Gy/h is far greater than that at 1.0 and 10.0 Gy/h. Even so, we confirm that the HD industrial camera is still working at 10.0 Gy/h during the 8 h of measurements, with a moderate decrease of the SNR (5 dB). The work is valuable and can provide suggestion for camera users in the radiation field.Entities:
Keywords: CMOS image sensor; HD camera; dose rate; radiation damage
Year: 2018 PMID: 29419782 PMCID: PMC5855046 DOI: 10.3390/s18020514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Lens for the test.
Figure 2HD camera module under test.
Irradiation experiment conditions and the serial numbers of the tested cameras.
| Camera Number | Bias Condition | Dose Rate (Gy/h) | Total Dose (Gy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | Biased | 1.0 | 8.0 |
| A02 | Biased | 10.0 | 80.0 |
| A03 | Biased | 20.0 | 160.0 |
| A04 | Biased | 50.0 | 400.0 |
| A05 | Biased | 100.0 | 800.0 |
Figure 3Images acquired without light source under the condition of five dose rates, respectively. (a) Image acquired at 1.0 Gy/h. (b) Image acquired at 10.0 Gy/h. (c) Image acquired at 20.0 Gy/h. (d) Image acquired at 50.0 Gy/h. (e) Image acquired at 100.0 Gy/h.
Figure 4Images acquired with light source under the condition of five dose rates, respectively. (a) Image acquired at 1.0 Gy/h. (b) Image acquired at 10.0 Gy/h. (c) Image acquired at 20.0 Gy/h. (d) Image acquired at 50.0 Gy/h. (e) Image acquired at 100.0 Gy/h.
Figure 5(a) The comparison of horizontal cross-section in Figure 4a (red solid line) and Figure 4b (green solid line). (b) The comparison of horizontal cross-section in Figure 4a (red solid line) and Figure 4c (blue solid line). (c) The comparison of horizontal cross section in Figure 4a (red solid line) and Figure 4d (pink solid line). (d) The comparison of horizontal cross-section in Figure 4a (red solid line) and Figure 4e (black solid line).
Figure 6(a) The histogram comparison of the dark and bright rectangle areas in Figure 4a. (b) The histogram comparison of the dark and bright rectangle areas in Figure 4b. (c) The histogram comparison of the dark and bright rectangle areas in Figure 4c. (d) The histogram comparison of the dark and bright rectangle areas in Figure 4d. (e) The histogram comparison of the dark and bright rectangle areas in Figure 4e.
Figure 7(a) versus Radiation time at various dose rates. (b) versus Radiation time at various dose rates.