Gary Fruhman1,2, Collin Miller3, Erol Amon1, Darbey Raible4, Rachael Bradshaw4, Kimberly Martin1,5. 1. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 2. Northwell Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY, USA. 3. Division of Research, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 5. Natera Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether obstetricians think that cardiac surgery is ethical in babies with common aneuploidies and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for these surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was e-mailed to 2897 OB-GYNs, and 898 (31%) actively practicing obstetricians responded to the survey. Respondents were asked whether it is ethical to offer cardiac surgery for babies with heart defects diagnosed with trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Turner syndrome and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for such surgeries in cases of trisomy 18 or 13. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare responses by using an alpha level of .05. RESULTS: Most obstetricians thought that offering cardiac surgery was ethical if the baby had trisomy 21 or Turner syndrome (94%), but not trisomy 18 or 13 (75%). Most obstetricians (69%) thought that insurance companies should not be legally required to pay for cardiac surgery for the latter group. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians were more likely to think cardiac surgery was ethical if the prognosis or the outcome was good. Most respondents did not think that insurance companies should be required to subsidize the cost of cardiac surgeries for all babies with trisomy 18 or 13.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether obstetricians think that cardiac surgery is ethical in babies with common aneuploidies and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for these surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was e-mailed to 2897 OB-GYNs, and 898 (31%) actively practicing obstetricians responded to the survey. Respondents were asked whether it is ethical to offer cardiac surgery for babies with heart defects diagnosed with trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Turner syndrome and whether insurance companies should be required to pay for such surgeries in cases of trisomy 18 or 13. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare responses by using an alpha level of .05. RESULTS: Most obstetricians thought that offering cardiac surgery was ethical if the baby had trisomy 21 or Turner syndrome (94%), but not trisomy 18 or 13 (75%). Most obstetricians (69%) thought that insurance companies should not be legally required to pay for cardiac surgery for the latter group. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians were more likely to think cardiac surgery was ethical if the prognosis or the outcome was good. Most respondents did not think that insurance companies should be required to subsidize the cost of cardiac surgeries for all babies with trisomy 18 or 13.