Gee Young Yun1, Hee Seok Moon2, In Sun Kwon3, Ju Seok Kim1, Sun Hyung Kang1, Eaum Seok Lee1, Seok Hyun Kim1, Jae Kyu Sung1, Byung Seok Lee1, Hyun Yong Jeong1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 35015, South Korea. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 35015, South Korea. mhs1357@cnuh.co.kr. 3. Clinical Trials Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, 266, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 35015, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of colonic resection for cancer have an increased risk for the development of metachronous malignant lesions. However, there is a lack of data on the detection rates of premalignant lesions during colonoscopy surveillance in these patients, and the few existing studies have shown conflicting results. AIMS: To identify the risk factor of metachronous premalignant lesions after colon cancer surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively screened consecutive patients who had undergone colonic surgery to treat colon cancer at the Chungnam National University Hospital between September 2009 and April 2014. We measured polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR, AADR) from the second surveillance colonoscopy in patients with left-sided colectomy (LCR) or right-sided colectomy (RCR). Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for other confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients were enrolled (220 LCR patients and 128 RCR patients). The PDR, ADR, and AADR in patients in the LCR and RCR groups were 56.4, 43.6, and 11.8% and 35.9, 26.6, and 9.4%, respectively. PDR and ADR in the LCR group were significantly higher than those in the RCR group. A multivariate analysis showed that male sex, hypertension, body mass index higher than 25, and LCR (odds ratio 2.090; 95% confidence interval 1.011-4.317) were associated with adenoma recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The LCR group had a higher adenoma recurrence rate than the RCR group. Further studies are required to determine the optimal surveillance intervals according to the type of colonic resection.
BACKGROUND:Patients with a history of colonic resection for cancer have an increased risk for the development of metachronous malignant lesions. However, there is a lack of data on the detection rates of premalignant lesions during colonoscopy surveillance in these patients, and the few existing studies have shown conflicting results. AIMS: To identify the risk factor of metachronous premalignant lesions after colon cancer surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively screened consecutive patients who had undergone colonic surgery to treat colon cancer at the Chungnam National University Hospital between September 2009 and April 2014. We measured polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR, AADR) from the second surveillance colonoscopy in patients with left-sided colectomy (LCR) or right-sided colectomy (RCR). Multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for other confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients were enrolled (220 LCR patients and 128 RCR patients). The PDR, ADR, and AADR in patients in the LCR and RCR groups were 56.4, 43.6, and 11.8% and 35.9, 26.6, and 9.4%, respectively. PDR and ADR in the LCR group were significantly higher than those in the RCR group. A multivariate analysis showed that male sex, hypertension, body mass index higher than 25, and LCR (odds ratio 2.090; 95% confidence interval 1.011-4.317) were associated with adenoma recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The LCR group had a higher adenoma recurrence rate than the RCR group. Further studies are required to determine the optimal surveillance intervals according to the type of colonic resection.
Authors: Harindra Jayasekara; Jeanette C Reece; Daniel D Buchanan; Dennis J Ahnen; Susan Parry; Mark A Jenkins; Aung Ko Win Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Chang Mo Moon; Jae Hee Cheon; Eun Hee Choi; Eun Soo Kim; Jae Jun Park; Song Yi Han; Duk Hwan Kim; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Ana Borda; José María Martínez-Peñuela; Fernando Borda; Miguel Muñoz-Navas; Francisco Javier Jiménez; Cristina Carretero Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.086
Authors: Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: S Pita-Fernández; M Alhayek-Aí; C González-Martín; B López-Calviño; T Seoane-Pillado; S Pértega-Díaz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 32.976