Literature DB >> 29417179

The DNA double-strand "breakome" of mouse spermatids.

Marie-Chantal Grégoire1, Frédéric Leduc1, Martin H Morin2, Tiphanie Cavé1, Mélina Arguin1, Martin Richter3, Pierre-Étienne Jacques2, Guylain Boissonneault4.   

Abstract

De novo germline mutations arise preferentially in male owing to fundamental differences between spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Post-meiotic chromatin remodeling in spermatids results in the elimination of most of the nucleosomal supercoiling and is characterized by transient DNA fragmentation. Using three alternative methods, DNA from sorted populations of mouse spermatids was used to confirm that double-strand breaks (DSB) are created in elongating spermatids and repaired at later steps. Specific capture of DSB was used for whole-genome mapping of DSB hotspots (breakome) for each population of differentiating spermatids. Hotspots are observed preferentially within introns and repeated sequences hence are more prevalent in the Y chromosome. When hotspots arise within genes, those involved in neurodevelopmental pathways become preferentially targeted reaching a high level of significance. Given the non-templated DNA repair in haploid spermatids, transient DSBs formation may, therefore, represent an important component of the male mutation bias and the etiology of neurological disorders, adding to the genetic variation provided by meiosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromatin remodeling; Double-strand break; Male mutation bias; Next-generation sequencing; Sperm DNA fragmentation; Spermatid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29417179     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2769-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  68 in total

1.  Transition from a nucleosome-based to a protamine-based chromatin configuration during spermiogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christina Rathke; Willy M Baarends; Sunil Jayaramaiah-Raja; Marek Bartkuhn; Rainer Renkawitz; Renate Renkawitz-Pohl
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Recognition and repair of chemically heterogeneous structures at DNA ends.

Authors:  Sara N Andres; Matthew J Schellenberg; Bret D Wallace; Percy Tumbale; R Scott Williams
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Topoisomerase IIB and an extracellular nuclease interact to digest sperm DNA in an apoptotic-like manner.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Shaman; Renata Prisztoka; W Steven Ward
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Frequency and Complexity of De Novo Structural Mutation in Autism.

Authors:  William M Brandler; Danny Antaki; Madhusudan Gujral; Amina Noor; Gabriel Rosanio; Timothy R Chapman; Daniel J Barrera; Guan Ning Lin; Dheeraj Malhotra; Amanda C Watts; Lawrence C Wong; Jasper A Estabillo; Therese E Gadomski; Oanh Hong; Karin V Fuentes Fajardo; Abhishek Bhandari; Renius Owen; Michael Baughn; Jeffrey Yuan; Terry Solomon; Alexandra G Moyzis; Michelle S Maile; Stephan J Sanders; Gail E Reiner; Keith K Vaux; Charles M Strom; Kang Zhang; Alysson R Muotri; Natacha Akshoomoff; Suzanne M Leal; Karen Pierce; Eric Courchesne; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Christina Corsello; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Murine and Human Spermatids Are Characterized by Numerous, Newly Synthesized and Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors and Bromodomain-Containing Proteins.

Authors:  Elisabeth Sabine Klaus; Nicola Helena Gonzalez; Martin Bergmann; Marek Bartkuhn; Wolfgang Weidner; Sabine Kliesch; Christina Rathke
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 6.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism.

Authors:  Stephan J Sanders; Michael T Murtha; Abha R Gupta; John D Murdoch; Melanie J Raubeson; A Jeremy Willsey; A Gulhan Ercan-Sencicek; Nicholas M DiLullo; Neelroop N Parikshak; Jason L Stein; Michael F Walker; Gordon T Ober; Nicole A Teran; Youeun Song; Paul El-Fishawy; Ryan C Murtha; Murim Choi; John D Overton; Robert D Bjornson; Nicholas J Carriero; Kyle A Meyer; Kaya Bilguvar; Shrikant M Mane; Nenad Sestan; Richard P Lifton; Murat Günel; Kathryn Roeder; Daniel H Geschwind; Bernie Devlin; Matthew W State
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Transient DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  Ludovic Marcon; Guylain Boissonneault
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Cell survival, DNA damage, and oncogenic transformation after a transient and reversible apoptotic response.

Authors:  Ho Lam Tang; Ho Man Tang; Keng Hou Mak; Shaomin Hu; Shan Shan Wang; Kit Man Wong; Chung Sing Timothy Wong; Hoi Yan Wu; Hiu Tung Law; Kan Liu; C Conover Talbot; Wan Keung Lau; Denise J Montell; Ming Chiu Fung
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Michael L Frigge; Gisli Masson; Soren Besenbacher; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Magnusson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Wendy S W Wong; Gunnar Sigurdsson; G Bragi Walters; Stacy Steinberg; Hannes Helgason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Olafur Th Magnusson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Non-canonical DNA/RNA structures during Transcription-Coupled Double-Strand Break Repair: Roadblocks or Bona fide repair intermediates?

Authors:  Nadine Puget; Kyle M Miller; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

2.  3D chromatin remodelling in the germ line modulates genome evolutionary plasticity.

Authors:  Lucía Álvarez-González; Frances Burden; Dadakhalandar Doddamani; Roberto Malinverni; Emma Leach; Cristina Marín-García; Laia Marín-Gual; Albert Gubern; Covadonga Vara; Andreu Paytuví-Gallart; Marcus Buschbeck; Peter J I Ellis; Marta Farré; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  BRCA1 and RNAi factors promote repair mediated by small RNAs and PALB2-RAD52.

Authors:  Liana Goehring; Serena Landini; Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki; Elodie Hatchi; Derrick K DeConti; Fieda O Abderazzaq; Priyankana Banerjee; Timothy M Demers; Yaoyu E Wang; John Quackenbush; David M Livingston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Meiosis and beyond - understanding the mechanistic and evolutionary processes shaping the germline genome.

Authors:  Roberta Bergero; Peter Ellis; Wilfried Haerty; Lee Larcombe; Iain Macaulay; Tarang Mehta; Mette Mogensen; David Murray; Will Nash; Matthew J Neale; Rebecca O'Connor; Christian Ottolini; Ned Peel; Luke Ramsey; Ben Skinner; Alexander Suh; Michael Summers; Yu Sun; Alison Tidy; Raheleh Rahbari; Claudia Rathje; Simone Immler
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 5.  Genetic Instability and Chromatin Remodeling in Spermatids.

Authors:  Tiphanie Cavé; Rebecka Desmarais; Chloé Lacombe-Burgoyne; Guylain Boissonneault
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.