Literature DB >> 29417042

Sample size for cluster sampling.

Bárbara Olenka Sánchez-Palomino1, Andrea Celi-Villacorta1, Laura Cecilia Gómez-Arrambide1, German F Alvarado2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29417042      PMCID: PMC5787989          DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.222048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care        ISSN: 2249-4863


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We read with interest the article published by Ganjiwale et al.[1] To study the association of quality of life of caregivers and the degree of functional independence and the quality of life of their patients with a history of stroke, is a very important issue, especially in specific non-Western populations, where there has been little research.[1] It is known that a lot of people with stroke live with certain functional limitations in their activities of daily living,[2] so they need a caretaker, who suffers physical and mental stress.[3] However, we have some concerns regarding the study design. The parameters considered for sample size calculation are incomplete; also, did the researchers calculate the power? was the “design effect” taken into account given the fact that the observations are not independent, but correlated? The patient-caregiver pair could be considered as a cluster; the “design effect” is directly proportional to the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC);[4] thus, if ICC and “design effect” were not taken into account, the study may not have adequate power.[5] Furthermore, power calculation has been made for a difference in proportions, however, the analysis was based on the correlation. In the methods section, data analysis plan was not shown; was the normality assumption evaluated in order to apply Pearson correlation? also, it is not known if Cronbach's alpha of the scales was computed, and if a factorial analysis was performed. Finally, we found certain discrepancies between the main aim and the conclusions mentioned in the abstract. Definitely, this issue deserves further discussion and studies with more explicit designs.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers.

Authors:  Shersten Killip; Ziyad Mahfoud; Kevin Pearce
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Functional recovery after ischemic stroke--a matter of age: data from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.

Authors:  M Knoflach; B Matosevic; M Rücker; M Furtner; A Mair; G Wille; A Zangerle; P Werner; J Ferrari; C Schmidauer; L Seyfang; S Kiechl; J Willeit
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Observed intra-cluster correlation coefficients in a cluster survey sample of patient encounters in general practice in Australia.

Authors:  Stephanie A Knox; Patty Chondros
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  The mediating effect of caregiver burden on the caregivers' quality of life.

Authors:  Yeon-Gyu Jeong; Yeon-Jae Jeong; Won-Cheol Kim; Jeong-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

5.  Association of quality of life of carers with quality of life and functional independence of stroke survivors.

Authors:  Deepak Ganjiwale; Jaishree Ganjiwale; Shweta Parikh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.