| Literature DB >> 29416973 |
Sam K Yasen1, Zakk M Borton1,2, Edward M Britton1,3, Harry C Palmer1, Adrian J Wilson1.
Abstract
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries usually constitute part of a multiligament injury. Isolated PCL injuries account for only approximately 3% of all ligament injuries. No consensus on optimal surgical reconstruction exists. The PCL is a double-bundle structure that functions in an anisometric manner. Biomechanical studies have shown that re-creating the PCL femoral double-bundle configuration provides greater stability. We present a 3-socket approach for an anatomic "all-inside" double-bundle PCL reconstruction using our preferred option of a FiberTape (Arthrex, Naples, FL)-reinforced peroneus longus allograft fashioned to create a trifurcate graft: the TriLink technique. Cortical suspensory fixation devices are used, allowing differential tensioning of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. This enables more accurate replication of the native PCL and its biomechanical properties.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29416973 PMCID: PMC5797281 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Equipment Required for Transmedial All-inside TriLink PCL Reconstruction
| Instrument or Implant | Reason |
|---|---|
| Standard 30° arthroscope | Used throughout except for tibial tunnel preparation |
| 70° arthroscope | Used to visualize posterior aspect of tibia and allow tibial tunnel preparation |
| Curved calibrated radiofrequency device (CoolCut CaliBlator) | Allows better preservation of bony landmarks compared with shaver Contoured so that while the probe tip is debriding the tibial footprint, the arm is in an optimal position to retract the posterior capsule, thus protecting the neurovascular bundle The arm is calibrated, enabling direct measurement of the medial wall of the intercondylar notch to facilitate accurate femoral tunnel placement |
| PCL RetroConstruction Drill Guide Set (Arthrex), tibial PCL aiming guide with marking hook, and femoral PCL aiming guide with marking hook | Specifically contoured instruments enabling accurate placement without impingement on bony landmarks Enables protection of posterior capsule while tibial tunnel is drilled |
| Combined guide pin and retrograde drill (second-generation FlipCutter) | Popularized by all-inside ACL reconstruction Creates bone-preserving tibial and femoral sockets |
| Arthroscopic shoulder cannula | Used to maintain patency of posteromedial portal |
| Arthroscopic portal cannula | Used for anteromedial portal Enables clear passage of snare sutures without soft-tissue bridges Allows easier passage of graft into knee without skin contact |
| Image intensifier | Required during tibial tunnel placement |
| FiberTape | High-strength composite polymer tape used to reinforce peroneus tendon autograft |
| Fixation devices | For femoral fixation of anterolateral and posteromedial limbs of TriLink construct For primary tibial fixation For backup fixation of FiberTape in proximal tibia |
ABS, attachable button system; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament.
Summary of Key Steps in TriLink Transmedial PCL Reconstruction
| 1. Preparation of TriLink trifurcate graft with or without FiberTape reinforcement using peroneus longus allograft or semitendinosus autograft |
| Graft sutured into loop with TightRope at either end |
| Knot inverted |
| Third TightRope positioned close to midpoint |
| Four-strand tibial limb sutured to retain shape of construct |
| 2. Tibial footprint preparation with neurovascular protection. Single retrograde socket drilled to 30-mm depth under fluoroscopic guidance, using the following aids: |
| RF device |
| PM portal with 70° arthroscope |
| PCL aiming guide |
| FlipCutter |
| 3. Direct measurement and marking of AL and PM femoral socket positions |
| 4. Retrograde drilling of 20-mm femoral sockets with PCL aiming guide |
| 5. Graft deployment through AM portal |
| Tibial limb docked to 20 mm |
| AL bundle docked next, followed by PM bundle |
| 6. Graft fixation and tensioning |
| AL bundle tensioned first; tensioned at 90° of flexion |
| PM bundle tensioned at 30° of flexion |
| SwiveLock backup fixation in tibia if required |
NOTE. The operative procedure is further shown in Video 1.
AL, anterolateral; AM, anteromedial; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; PM, posteromedial; RF, radiofrequency.
Fig 1Key steps in formation of TriLink construct for use in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. (A) The ends of the graft are sutured together with a TightRope positioned at either end. (B) A third TightRope is passed to the center of the loop, and the 2 resultant limbs are adjusted in size. (AL, anterolateral.) (C) The position of the TriLink graft is fixed with nonabsorbable sutures. Our preferred graft is quadrupled semitendinosus or FiberTape-reinforced peroneus longus allograft. (AL, anterolateral; PM, posteromedial.)
Fig 2SwiveLock fixation device used if backup fixation at tibia is required. (A) The Application and tensioning of SwiveLock. (PM, posteromedial.) (B) In situ SwiveLock with components labeled. (ABS, attachable button system.)
Fig 3Key steps in transmedial all-inside posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (depicted in a right knee): (1) Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is used to clear the tibial footprint. (2) The FlipCutter guide is placed and a guidewire drilled into the knee under fluoroscopic guidance. (3) A TigerStick is used to pass a shuttling suture through the resultant retrosocket. (4) The FlipCutter is centered over the sites for the 2 femoral bundles, and 2 further retrosockets are created. (5) Shuttling sutures are passed and retrieved simultaneously. (AL, anterolateral; PM, posteromedial.) (6) The tibial limb is docked to the premarked 2-cm mark. (7, 8) The 2 femoral bundles are docked and tensioned individually.
Principal Advantages and Disadvantages, Along With Pertinent Pearls and Pitfalls, of Transmedial TriLink PCL Reconstruction
| Explanation | |
|---|---|
| Advantages | |
| Double bundle on femur | Replicates femoral anatomy Improved femoral footprint fill Improved biomechanical stability |
| Anatomic positioning of femoral bundles | No need for intraoperative hyperflexion Matches functional PCL anisometry Better replicates PCL biomechanics |
| Single tibial bundle | Matches compact tibial PCL footprint Avoids technical difficulty with 2 tibial sockets No risk of socket confluence |
| Bone preserving | Sockets created, not tunnels |
| Cortical suspensory fixation | Robust and reliable fixation method Allows in situ adjustment of tension |
| Easy graft passage | Graft introduced into knee and drawn into sockets; therefore, no requirement for graft to be dragged around “killer turn” of tibia |
| Disadvantages | |
| Technically challenging | More challenging than single-bundle reconstruction but easier than traditional double-bundle techniques |
| Pearls | |
| Use of arthroscopic cannulas | This not only is advantageous by maintaining the patency of the port during instrument changes but also facilitates withdrawal of the sutures without entrapment of the soft tissues. |
| Tensioning second limb by femoral TR alone | The AL bundle is tensioned first, and having done so, the tibial TR cannot be adjusted (when tensioning the PM bundle) without compromising the AL tension. |
| Use of a 70° arthroscope | Direct visualization of the tibial footprint is allowed. |
| Pitfalls | |
| Graft and suture entanglement | Meticulous suture management is required, which can be facilitated by use of a PassPort cannula (Arthrex) through the AM portal. |
| Potential graft bottoming out | Retrosockets must have sufficient depth to accommodate any slack in the graft. Insufficient socket depth will result in bottoming out of the graft and graft laxity. |
| Overconstrained knee | Pulling too much graft into the sockets by over-tensioning will reduce intra-articular graft length and overconstrain the knee. |
AL, anterolateral; AM, anteromedial; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; PM, posteromedial; TR, TightRope.