| Literature DB >> 29416499 |
Leila Bond1, Kamren Bernhardt1, Priyank Madria1, Katherine Sorrentino1, Hailee Scelsi1,2, Cassie S Mitchell1.
Abstract
Oxidative stress, induced by an imbalance of free radicals, incites neurodegeneration in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). In fact, a mutation in antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) accounts for 20% of familial ALS cases. However, the variance among individual studies examining ALS oxidative stress clouds corresponding conclusions. Therefore, we construct a comprehensive, temporal view of oxidative stress and corresponding antioxidant therapy in preclinical ALS by mining published quantitative experimental data and performing metadata analysis of 41 studies. In vitro aggregate analysis of innate oxidative stress inducers, glutamate and hydrogen peroxide, revealed 70-90% of cell death coincides to inducer exposure equivalent to 30-50% peak concentration (p < 0.05). A correlative plateau in cell death suggests oxidative stress impact is greatest in early-stage neurodegeneration. In vivo SOD1-G93A transgenic ALS mouse aggregate analysis of heat shock proteins (HSPs) revealed HSP levels are 30% lower in muscle than spine (p < 0.1). Overall spine HSP levels, including HSP70, are mildly upregulated in SOD1-G93A mice compared to wild type, but not significantly (p > 0.05). Thus, innate HSP compensatory responses to oxidative stress are simply insufficient, a result supportive of homeostatic system instability as central to ALS etiology. In vivo aggregate analysis of antioxidant therapy finds SOD1-G93A ALS mouse survival duration significantly increases by 11.2% (p << 0.001) but insignificantly decreases onset age by 2%. Thus, the aggregate antioxidant treatment effect on survival in preclinical ALS is not sufficient to overcome clinical heterogeneity, which explains the literature disparity between preclinical and clinical antioxidant survival benefit. The aggregate effect sizes on preclinical ALS survival and onset illustrate that present antioxidants, alone, are not sufficient to halt ALS, which underscores its multi-factorial nature. Nonetheless, antioxidant-treated SOD1-G93A ALS mice have significantly increased motor performance (p < 0.05) measured via rotarod. With a colossal aggregate preclinical effect size average of 59.6%, antioxidants are promising for increasing function/quality of life in clinical ALS patients, a premise worth exploration via low-risk nutritional supplements. Finally, more direct, quantitative measures of oxidative stress, antioxidant levels and bioavailability are key to developing powerful antioxidant therapeutics that can assert measurable impacts on redox homeostasis in the brain and spinal cord.Entities:
Keywords: HSP70; antioxidants; glutamate; motoneuron disease; oxidants; rotarod; vitamins
Year: 2018 PMID: 29416499 PMCID: PMC5787557 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Data categorization, samples sizes, and sources.
| All | 8 | 47 | Kriscenski-Perry et al., | |
| Glutamate | 4 | 18 | Kriscenski-Perry et al., | |
| H2O2 | 3 | 15 | Kriscenski-Perry et al., | |
| Paraquat | 3 | 14 | Petri et al., | |
| All | 11 | 57 | Kiaei et al., | |
| Spine | 5 | 41 | Kiaei et al., | |
| Muscle | 6 | 16 | Kiaei et al., | |
| HSP70 | 8 | 25 | Kiaei et al., | |
| All | 22 | 187 | Barneoud and Curet, | |
| Onset | 8 | 16 | Kriscenski-Perry et al., | |
| Survival | 16 | 32 | Andreassen et al., | |
| Rotarod | 15 | 139 | Barneoud and Curet, |
The category states the type of data analyzed based on the sub-study definitions (see Methods), sub-category lists the individual metric(s) assessed, articles represents the number of included data source studies, sample size represents the number of included data points (cell cultures or mice), and references list the article citations for the included original data sources.
Figure 1Cell death as a function of oxidant concentration In vitro. (A) In vitro cell death following exposure to paraquat, glutamate, or hydrogen peroxide concentrations (uM) (p < 0.05). (B) In vitro cell death trend plateaus following exposure to physiologically relevant glutamate concentrations (p < 0.05). (C) In vitro cell death trend following exposure of glutamate in excess of physiologically relevant concentrations (p < 0.05). (D) A scatter plot of concentration vs. cell death of 250, 500, and 1,000 uM of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (p < 0.05). Incubation times 2, 4, 6, and 10 h represented from bottom to top (p < 0.05). (E) In vitro cell death trend following exposure to paraquat, an extrinsic oxidative stress inducer (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Heat-Shock Protein (HSP) concentration during disease progression in spine and muscle tissue samples from SOD1-G93A mice. Mann-Whitney U-Tests were used to determine any significance in all figure parts. (A) The G93A/WT ratio of HSP70 in the spine and muscle for three age groups. (B) The aggregate G93A/WT ratio of HSP70 concentration in the spine and muscle. (C) The G93A/WT ratio of overall HSP levels in the spine and muscle for three age groups. (D) The aggregate G93A/WT ratio of overall HSP concentration in the spine and muscle. (E) The G93A/WT ratio of overall HSP concentration for all locations combined and aggregated by age group. **p < 0.05, *p < 0.10.
Figure 3Effect of antioxidant treatment on in vivo outcome measures. Treatment group included SOD1-G93A mice given treatments to protect against oxidative stress. Control group included untreated SOD1-G93A mice. *p < 0.05. (A) A Mann-Whitney U-test found no statistically significant difference between the mean onset dates of the control compared to the treatment (p > 0.05; n = number of mice). (B) A Mann Whitney U-test showed significant difference between survival dates of the treatment group vs. the control (p < 0.05). (C) Aggregated rotarod performance for SOD1-G93A mice treated with antioxidants and untreated SOD1-G93A mice (n = 139 total data points for each). ANOVA for overall treatment vs. control data (p < 0.05), t-tests for overall treatment vs. control (p < 0.05), and t-tests for treatment vs. control in each time range (in days), (p < 0.05). There is a consistent, significant difference between treatment and control rotarod performance.
Figure 4Comparison of early vs. late pre-onset treatment on animal survival. (A) Distribution of data points for time bin determination. The “early” pre-onset treatment group included mice that started treatments before day 42, and the “late” pre-onset treatment group consisted of mice that started treatments after day 42 (see Methods section Statistical Analysis). (B) Mean survival day for the early treatment group compared to late treatment group. A Mann Whitney U-test showed no statistically significant difference between the early and late pre-onset treatment groups.