| Literature DB >> 29416210 |
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP) is the most common cardiac valve pathology of to day. Aim of article was to identify the types and frequency of potentially malignant arrhythmia and atrial brillation in patients with MVP, to determine the differences in these arrhythmias between classical and non-classical MVP, to evaluate the correlation of potentially malignant arrhythmia and atrial fibrillation with MVP with possible clinical complications of arrhythmogenic sudden cardiac death and potential risk of thromboembolic vascular incident. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Article has retrospective-prospective analytical character and present observational study on 239 patients (120 with MVP (66 with classical and 54 with non-classical MVP), who had a subjective feeling of palpitations and/or pain in the chest, and/or episode of syncope, and did not have ischemic heart disease or another valve pathology) and 119 healthy patients in the control group. All patients were analyzed by 24-hour ECG Holter.Entities:
Keywords: ECG Holter monitoring; arrhythmia; mitral valve prolapse
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29416210 PMCID: PMC5789557 DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.9-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Arch ISSN: 0350-199X
Basic demographic data of respondents with MVP
| Classic MVP (A1) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||
| Interval years | 17-69 | 9-70 | 9-70 |
| n | 36 | 30 | 66 |
| X | 33.333 | 36.000 | 34.545 |
| S | 15.941 | 15.308 | 15.594 |
| SX | 2.657 | 2.795 | 1.919 |
| Median | 26 | 33 | 29.5 |
| Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test | p = 0.207 | ||
| Non-classic MVP | Total | ||
| Male | Female | ||
| Interval years | 17-54 | 26-51 | 17-54 |
| n | 30 | 24 | 54 |
| X | 30.633 | 35.708 | 32.889 |
| S | 10.529 | 7.799 | 9.671 |
| SX | 1.922 | 1.592 | 1.316 |
| Median | 29.5 | 36 | 34 |
| Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test | p = 0.034 | ||
Rhythm disorders by groups
| Classic MVP (A1) n = 66 | Non-classic MVP (A2) n = 54 | Control group (B) n = 119 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ventricular disorders of the rhythm of 3., 4. and 5. degree by Lown scale | 17 (25.7%) | 2 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | A1 Vs B |
| Preexcitation signs (WPW and LGL syndrome) | 12 (18.1%) | 6 (11.1%) | 3 | A1 Vs B |
| QT Prolongation | 8 (12.1%) | 0 | 0 | A1 Vs B |
| AV block of II (Mobitz II) and III degree | 8 (12,1%) | 0 | 0 | A1VsB |
| Atrial fibrillation | 10 (15,2%) | 1 (0,8%) | 0 | A1 Vs B |
| Rhythm disorders by subgroups A1 and A2 with classical and non-classical MVP | ||||
| Classical MVP (A1) n = 66 | Non-classical MVP (A2) n = 54 | |||
| Ventricular disorders of the rhythm of 3., 4. and 5. degree by Lown scale | 17 (25.7%) | 2 (3.7%) | X2 = 9.248; | |
| Preexcitation signs (WPW and LGL syndrome) | 12 (18.1%) | 6 (11.1%) | X2 = 0.676; | |
| QT Prolongation | 8 (12.1%) | 0 | X2 = 5.200; | |
| AV block of II (Mobitz II) and III degree | 8 (12.1%) | 0 | X2 = 5.200; | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 6 (9.1%) | 1 (0.9%) | X2 = 5.834 | |
| Intermittent atrial fibrillation | 4 (6.1%) | 0 | X2= 4.785 | |
Potential risk of arrhythmogenic sudden cardiac death (“SCD”)
| Classical MVP (A1) n = 66 | Non-classical MVP (A2) n = 54 | Control group (B) n = 119 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| n | 49 | 17 | 7 | 47 | 9 | 110 |
| 74.2% | 25.8% | 12.9% | 87.1% | 7.5% | 92.5% | |
| (A1) Vs (A2) | X2 = 42.382; | |||||
| (A2) Vs (B) | X2 = 10.816; | |||||
| (A1) Vs (B) | X2 = 84.632; | |||||
Potential risk of vascular incident
| Classical MVP (A1) n = 66 | Non-classical MVP (A2) n = 54 | Control group (B) n = 119 | ||||
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| N | 10 | 56 | 1 | 53 | 0 | 119 |
| 15.15% | 84.85% | 0.02% | 98.98% | 0.00% | 100.0% | |
| (1) Vs (2) | X2 = 6.3265; | |||||
| (2) Vs (3) | X2 = 2.2449; | |||||
| (1) Vs (3) | X2 = 14.0426; | |||||