Literature DB >> 29415904

The Efficacy of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Pilot Study.

Yuka Ota1, Naoki Ozeki1, Kenya Yuki1, Daisuke Shiba1, Itaru Kimura1,2,3, Kazushige Tsunoda3, Kei Shinoda1,2,4, Hisao Ohde1, Kazuo Tsubota1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of transcorneal electrical stimulation in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. Five eyes of four male subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (average age: 52.25 ± 14.68 years) were enrolled. The subjects underwent transcorneal electrical stimulation every 3 months according to the following procedure. A Dawson-Trick-Litzkow electrode was placed on the cornea, and biphasic electric current pulses (10 ms, 20 Hz) were delivered using a stimulator (BPG-1,BAK Electronics) and a stimulus isolation unit (BSI-2). A current that evoked a phosphene that the subject perceived in the whole visual area was delivered continuously for 30 min. Humphrey visual field testing was performed after every third transcorneal electrical stimulation treatment. Changes in mean deviation (MD) values were evaluated with a linear regression model. Transcorneal electrical stimulation was performed 18.2 ± 9.4 times over a period of 49.8 ± 23.0 months. The average pretranscorneal electrical stimulation intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, and MD values were 11.8 ± 1.79 mmHg, 0.14 ± 0.19 (logMAR) and -17.28 ± 6.24 dB, respectively. No significant differences were observed in intraocular pressure before and after transcorneal electrical stimulation. However, there was a significant positive linear relationship between changes in MD values and the number of transcorneal electrical stimulation treatments (R2 = 0.176, P = 0.005, Spearman correlation R =0.294, P = 0.008). Transcorneal electrical stimulation treatment may improve glaucomatous visual field defects in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. Large-scale studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neuroprotection; primary open-angle glaucoma; transcorneal electrical stimulation; visual field

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29415904     DOI: 10.2302/kjm.2017-0015-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Keio J Med        ISSN: 0022-9717


  9 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Ocular Cells: A Means for Improving Ocular Tissue Engineering and Treatments of Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi; Ali Azizi; Sahar Shariat; Mohammadkarim Johari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Glaucomatous optic neuropathy treatment options: the promise of novel therapeutics, techniques and tools to help preserve vision.

Authors:  Najam A Sharif
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.135

3.  A Single-Arm, Prospective, Exploratory Study to Preliminarily Test Effectiveness and Safety of Skin Electrical Stimulation for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Takuji Kurimoto; Kaori Ueda; Sotaro Mori; Seiko Kamada; Mari Sakamoto; Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi; Wataru Matsumiya; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss.

Authors:  Carl Erb; Sophie Eckert; Pia Gindorf; Martin Köhler; Thomas Köhler; Lukas Neuhann; Thomas Neuhann; Nadja Salzmann; Stefanie Schmickler; Jens Ellrich
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Evaluating the efficacy and safety of transdermal electrical stimulation on the visual functions of patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a clinical trial protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-masked and sham-controlled design (ePICO trial).

Authors:  Gen Miura; Yoshihito Ozawa; Yuki Shiko; Yohei Kawasaki; Takayuki Iwase; Tadami Fujiwara; Takayuki Baba; Hideki Hanaoka; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Can neuroprotection effectively manage primary open-angle glaucoma? a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Xiu Qi; Jian Zhang; Xing-Jie Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Electrical stimulation inhibits Val-boroPro-induced pyroptosis in THP-1 macrophages via sirtuin3 activation to promote autophagy and inhibit ROS generation.

Authors:  Lin Cong; Ziyu Gao; Yinghong Zheng; Ting Ye; Zitong Wang; Pengyu Wang; Manman Li; Bowen Dong; Wei Yang; Quanfeng Li; Shupei Qiao; Cao Wang; Yijun Shen; Hong Li; Weiming Tian; Liming Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Non-invasive current stimulation in vision recovery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Cecilia Perin; Barbara Viganò; Daniele Piscitelli; Barbara Maria Matteo; Roberto Meroni; Cesare Giuseppe Cerri
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Ocular direct current stimulation affects retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Maren-Christina Blum; Alexander Hunold; Benjamin Solf; Sascha Klee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.