Literature DB >> 29415608

Functional Status Examination in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Joan Machamer1, Nancy R Temkin1,2,3, Geoffrey T Manley4, Sureyya Dikmen1,2,5.   

Abstract

The assessment of functional status after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and its revised version, the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE), have been used most frequently in TBI research, but there are concerns about the sensitivity of these measures. The current study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Functional Status Examination (FSE) using a sample of 448 moderately to severely injured subjects with TBI. It was shown that the FSE is significantly related to other measures of functional status including the GOSE, Short Form Health Survey, and European Quality of Life Checklist (p < 0.001), is sensitive to TBI severity (p < 0.001), and is responsive to recovery from 3 to 6 months post-injury (p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant agreement (r = 0.817, p < 0.001) between the patient and significant other's assessment of functional status on the FSE at 6 months post-injury. The FSE may be a valuable measure of functional status after TBI given its strong psychometric properties, including validity, sensitivity to brain injury severity, and recovery over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional status; patient outcome assessment; psychometric properties; traumatic brain injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29415608      PMCID: PMC5953217          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  22 in total

Review 1.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  G G Whiteneck; S W Charlifue; K A Gerhart; J D Overholser; G N Richardson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group.

Authors:  S C Choi; A Marmarou; R Bullock; J S Nichols; X Wei; L H Pitts
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis.

Authors:  C V Granger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  S Dikmen; J Machamer; B Miller; J Doctor; N Temkin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists.

Authors:  A D Nichol; A M Higgins; B J Gabbe; L J Murray; D J Cooper; P A Cameron
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Longitudinal Study of Cognition, Functional Status, and Post-Traumatic Symptoms.

Authors:  Sureyya Dikmen; Joan Machamer; Nancy Temkin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nancy R Temkin; Gail D Anderson; H Richard Winn; Richard G Ellenbogen; Gavin W Britz; James Schuster; Timothy Lucas; David W Newell; Pamela Nelson Mansfield; Joan E Machamer; Jason Barber; Sureyya S Dikmen
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Quality of life following intensive care.

Authors:  D L Patrick; M Danis; L I Southerland; G Hong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Neurobehavioral effects of phenytoin prophylaxis of posttraumatic seizures.

Authors:  S S Dikmen; N R Temkin; B Miller; J Machamer; H R Winn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Functional Status Examination versus Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended as Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injuries: How Do They Compare?

Authors:  Sureyya Dikmen; Joan Machamer; Geoffrey T Manley; Esther L Yuh; Lindsay D Nelson; Nancy R Temkin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Moving toward Appropriate Motor Assessment Tools in People Affected by Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review with Clinical Advices.

Authors:  Mirjam Bonanno; Rosaria De Luca; William Torregrossa; Paolo Tonin; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  How Do Scores on the Functional Status Examination (FSE) Correspond to Scores on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)?

Authors:  Lindsay D Nelson; Brooke E Magnus; Nancy R Temkin; Sureyya Dikmen; Geoffrey T Manley; Steve Balsis
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Functional Status Examination Yields Higher Measurement Precision than the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Lindsay D Nelson; Brooke E Magnus; Nancy R Temkin; Sureyya Dikmen; Steve Balsis
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.